mirror of
https://github.com/nodejs/node.git
synced 2024-11-21 21:19:50 +01:00
b899140291
As the CTC grows and has representation from more time zones, we need to embrace asynchronous decision making and rely less on the actual meeting. This change is a proposal for that which, ironically, probably has to be approved at a meeting. PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/8945 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Julien Gilli <jgilli@nodejs.org> Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org> Reviewed-By: Shigeki Ohtsu <ohtsu@ohtsu.org>
168 lines
7.1 KiB
Markdown
168 lines
7.1 KiB
Markdown
# Node.js Project Governance
|
|
|
|
## Core Technical Committee
|
|
|
|
The Node.js project is governed by a Core Technical Committee (CTC) which is
|
|
responsible for high-level guidance of the project.
|
|
|
|
The CTC has final authority over this project including:
|
|
|
|
* Technical direction
|
|
* Project governance and process (including this policy)
|
|
* Contribution policy
|
|
* GitHub repository hosting
|
|
* Conduct guidelines
|
|
* Maintaining the list of additional Collaborators
|
|
|
|
For the current list of CTC members, see the project
|
|
[README.md](./README.md#current-project-team-members).
|
|
|
|
## Collaborators
|
|
|
|
The [nodejs/node](https://github.com/nodejs/node) GitHub repository is
|
|
maintained by the CTC and additional Collaborators who are added by the
|
|
CTC on an ongoing basis.
|
|
|
|
Individuals identified by the CTC as making significant and valuable
|
|
contributions are made Collaborators and given commit access to the project.
|
|
|
|
_Note:_ If you make a significant contribution and are not considered
|
|
for commit access, log an issue or contact a CTC member directly.
|
|
|
|
Modifications of the contents of the nodejs/node repository are made on
|
|
a collaborative basis. Anybody with a GitHub account may propose a
|
|
modification via pull request and it will be considered by the project
|
|
Collaborators. All pull requests must be reviewed and accepted by a
|
|
Collaborator with sufficient expertise who is able to take full
|
|
responsibility for the change. In the case of pull requests proposed
|
|
by an existing Collaborator, an additional Collaborator is required
|
|
for sign-off. Consensus should be sought if additional Collaborators
|
|
participate and there is disagreement around a particular
|
|
modification. See [Consensus Seeking Process](#consensus-seeking-process) below
|
|
for further detail on the consensus model used for governance.
|
|
|
|
Collaborators may opt to elevate significant or controversial modifications to
|
|
the CTC by assigning the ***ctc-agenda*** tag to a pull request or issue. The
|
|
CTC should serve as the final arbiter where required.
|
|
|
|
For the current list of Collaborators, see the project
|
|
[README.md](./README.md#current-project-team-members).
|
|
|
|
A guide for Collaborators is maintained in
|
|
[COLLABORATOR_GUIDE.md](./COLLABORATOR_GUIDE.md).
|
|
|
|
### Collaborator Activities
|
|
|
|
Typical activities of a Collaborator include:
|
|
|
|
* helping users and novice contributors
|
|
* contributing code and documentation changes that improve the project
|
|
* reviewing and commenting on issues and pull requests
|
|
* participation in working groups
|
|
* merging pull requests
|
|
|
|
While the above are typical things done by Collaborators, there are no required
|
|
activities to retain Collaborator status. There is currently no process by which
|
|
inactive Collaborators are removed from the project.
|
|
|
|
## CTC Membership
|
|
|
|
CTC seats are not time-limited. There is no fixed size of the CTC. The CTC
|
|
should be of such a size as to ensure adequate coverage of important areas of
|
|
expertise balanced with the ability to make decisions efficiently.
|
|
|
|
There is no specific set of requirements or qualifications for CTC
|
|
membership beyond these rules.
|
|
|
|
The CTC may add additional members to the CTC by a standard CTC motion.
|
|
|
|
When a CTC member's participation in [CTC activities](#ctc-activities) has become
|
|
minimal for a sustained period of time, the CTC will request that the member
|
|
either indicate an intention to increase participation or voluntarily resign.
|
|
|
|
CTC members may only be removed by voluntary resignation or through a standard
|
|
CTC motion.
|
|
|
|
Changes to CTC membership should be posted in the agenda, and may be
|
|
suggested as any other agenda item (see [CTC Meetings](#ctc-meetings) below).
|
|
|
|
No more than 1/3 of the CTC members may be affiliated with the same
|
|
employer. If removal or resignation of a CTC member, or a change of
|
|
employment by a CTC member, creates a situation where more than 1/3 of
|
|
the CTC membership shares an employer, then the situation must be
|
|
immediately remedied by the resignation or removal of one or more CTC
|
|
members affiliated with the over-represented employer(s).
|
|
|
|
### CTC Activities
|
|
|
|
Typical activities of a CTC member include:
|
|
|
|
* attending the weekly meeting
|
|
* commenting on the weekly CTC meeting issue and issues labeled `ctc-agenda`
|
|
* participating in CTC email threads
|
|
* volunteering for tasks that arise from CTC meetings and related discussions
|
|
* other activities (beyond those typical of Collaborators) that facilitate the
|
|
smooth day-to-day operation of the Node.js project
|
|
|
|
Note that CTC members are also Collaborators and therefore typically perform
|
|
Collaborator activities as well.
|
|
|
|
### CTC Meetings
|
|
|
|
The CTC meets weekly in a voice conference call. The meeting is run by a
|
|
designated moderator approved by the CTC. Each meeting is streamed on YouTube.
|
|
|
|
Items are added to the CTC agenda which are considered contentious or
|
|
are modifications of governance, contribution policy, CTC membership,
|
|
or release process.
|
|
|
|
The intention of the agenda is not to approve or review all patches.
|
|
That should happen continuously on GitHub and be handled by the larger
|
|
group of Collaborators.
|
|
|
|
Any community member or contributor can ask that something be added to
|
|
the next meeting's agenda by logging a GitHub issue. Any Collaborator,
|
|
CTC member, or the moderator can add the item to the agenda by adding
|
|
the ***ctc-agenda*** tag to the issue.
|
|
|
|
Prior to each CTC meeting, the moderator will share the agenda with
|
|
members of the CTC. CTC members can also add items to the agenda at the
|
|
beginning of each meeting. The moderator and the CTC cannot veto or remove
|
|
items.
|
|
|
|
The CTC may invite persons or representatives from certain projects to
|
|
participate in a non-voting capacity.
|
|
|
|
The moderator is responsible for summarizing the discussion of each agenda item
|
|
and sending it as a pull request after the meeting.
|
|
|
|
Due to the challenges of scheduling a global meeting with participants in
|
|
several timezones, the CTC will seek to resolve as many agenda items as possible
|
|
outside of meetings using
|
|
[the CTC issue tracker](https://github.com/nodejs/CTC/issues). The process in
|
|
the issue tracker is:
|
|
|
|
* A CTC member opens an issue explaining the proposal/issue and @-mentions
|
|
@nodejs/ctc.
|
|
* After 72 hours, if there are two or more `LGTM`s from other CTC members and no
|
|
explicit opposition from other CTC members, then the proposal is approved.
|
|
* If there are any CTC members objecting, then a conversation ensues until
|
|
either the proposal is dropped or the objecting members are persuaded. If
|
|
there is an extended impasse, a motion for a vote may be made.
|
|
|
|
## Consensus Seeking Process
|
|
|
|
The CTC follows a
|
|
[Consensus Seeking](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consensus-seeking_decision-making)
|
|
decision making model.
|
|
|
|
When an agenda item has appeared to reach a consensus, the moderator will ask
|
|
"Does anyone object?" as a final call for dissent from the consensus.
|
|
|
|
If an agenda item cannot reach a consensus, a CTC member can call for either a
|
|
closing vote or a vote to table the issue to the next meeting. All votes
|
|
(including votes to close or table) pass if and only if more than 50% of the CTC
|
|
members (excluding individuals who explicitly abstain) vote in favor. For
|
|
example, if there are 20 CTC members, and 5 of those members indicate that they
|
|
abstain, then 8 votes in favor are required for a resolution to pass.
|