0
0
mirror of https://github.com/nodejs/node.git synced 2024-11-29 23:16:30 +01:00
nodejs/doc/onboarding-extras.md
Rich Trott 22884a7d23 doc: move who-to-cc to COLABORATOR_GUIDE.md
Put the "who to cc" information in the COLLABORATOR_GUIDE. The
onboarding-extras doc is a bit of miscellaneous collection. Rather than
stashing things in a junk drawer doc, put them where they are relevant.

PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/19460
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <apapirovski@mac.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
2018-03-21 20:27:36 -07:00

3.4 KiB
Raw Blame History

Additional Onboarding Information

Labels

Subsystems

  • lib/*.js (assert, buffer, etc.)
  • build
  • doc
  • lib / src
  • test
  • tools

There may be more than one subsystem valid for any particular issue or pull request.

General

  • confirmed-bug - Bugs you have verified exist
  • discuss - Things that need larger discussion
  • feature request - Any issue that requests a new feature (usually not PRs)
  • good first issue - Issues suitable for newcomers to process
  • meta - For issues whose topic is governance, policies, procedures, etc.

--

  • semver-{minor,major}
    • be conservative that is, if a change has the remote chance of breaking something, go for semver-major
    • when adding a semver label, add a comment explaining why you're adding it
    • minor vs. patch: roughly: "does it add a new method / does it add a new section to the docs"
    • major vs. everything else: run last versions tests against this version, if they pass, probably minor or patch
    • A breaking change helper (full source):
    SHOW=$(git show-ref -d $(git describe --abbrev=0) | tail -n1 | awk '{print $1}')
    git checkout $(git show -s --pretty='%T' $SHOW) -- test
    make -j4 test
    

LTS/Version labels

We use labels to keep track of which branches a commit should land on:

  • dont-land-on-v?.x
    • For changes that do not apply to a certain release line
    • Also used when the work of backporting a change outweighs the benefits
  • land-on-v?.x
    • Used by releasers to mark a PR as scheduled for inclusion in an LTS release
    • Applied to the original PR for clean cherry-picks, to the backport PR otherwise
  • backport-requested-v?.x
    • Used to indicate that a PR needs a manual backport to a branch in order to land the changes on that branch
    • Typically applied by a releaser when the PR does not apply cleanly or it breaks the tests after applying
    • Will be replaced by either dont-land-on-v?.x or backported-to-v?.x
  • backported-to-v?.x
    • Applied to PRs for which a backport PR has been merged
  • lts-watch-v?.x
    • Applied to PRs which the LTS working group should consider including in a LTS release
    • Does not indicate that any specific action will be taken, but can be effective as messaging to non-collaborators
  • lts-agenda
    • For things that need discussion by the LTS working group
    • (for example semver-minor changes that need or should go into an LTS release)
  • v?.x
    • Automatically applied to changes that do not target master but rather the v?.x-staging branch

Once a release line enters maintenance mode, the corresponding labels do not need to be attached anymore, as only important bugfixes will be included.

Other Labels

  • Operating system labels
    • macos, windows, smartos, aix
    • No linux, linux is the implied default
  • Architecture labels
    • arm, mips, s390, ppc
    • No x86{_64}, since that is the implied default

Updating Node.js from Upstream

  • git remote add upstream git://github.com/nodejs/node.git

to update from nodejs/node:

  • git checkout master
  • git remote update -p OR git fetch --all (I prefer the former)
  • git merge --ff-only upstream/master (or REMOTENAME/BRANCH)

Best practices

  • When making PRs, spend time writing a thorough description.
  • Usually only squash at the end of your work.