mirror of
https://github.com/wagtail/wagtail.git
synced 2024-11-29 17:36:49 +01:00
b131b4813e
- added sub-section to language part of general_guidelines.md - fixes #8860
117 lines
6.1 KiB
Markdown
117 lines
6.1 KiB
Markdown
(boundblocks_and_values)=
|
|
|
|
# About StreamField BoundBlocks and values
|
|
|
|
All StreamField block types accept a `template` parameter to determine how they will be rendered on a page. However, for blocks that handle basic Python data types, such as `CharBlock` and `IntegerBlock`, there are some limitations on where the template will take effect, since those built-in types (`str`, `int` and so on) cannot be 'taught' about their template rendering. As an example of this, consider the following block definition:
|
|
|
|
```python
|
|
class HeadingBlock(blocks.CharBlock):
|
|
class Meta:
|
|
template = 'blocks/heading.html'
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
where `blocks/heading.html` consists of:
|
|
|
|
```html+django
|
|
<h1>{{ value }}</h1>
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
This gives us a block that behaves as an ordinary text field, but wraps its output in `<h1>` tags whenever it is rendered:
|
|
|
|
```python
|
|
class BlogPage(Page):
|
|
body = StreamField([
|
|
# ...
|
|
('heading', HeadingBlock()),
|
|
# ...
|
|
], use_json_field=True)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
```html+django
|
|
{% load wagtailcore_tags %}
|
|
|
|
{% for block in page.body %}
|
|
{% if block.block_type == 'heading' %}
|
|
{% include_block block %} {# This block will output its own <h1>...</h1> tags. #}
|
|
{% endif %}
|
|
{% endfor %}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
This kind of arrangement - a value that supposedly represents a plain text string, but has its own custom HTML representation when output on a template - would normally be a very messy thing to achieve in Python, but it works here because the items you get when iterating over a StreamField are not actually the 'native' values of the blocks. Instead, each item is returned as an instance of `BoundBlock` - an object that represents the pairing of a value and its block definition. By keeping track of the block definition, a `BoundBlock` always knows which template to render. To get to the underlying value - in this case, the text content of the heading - you would need to access `block.value`. Indeed, if you were to output `{% include_block block.value %}` on the page, you would find that it renders as plain text, without the `<h1>` tags.
|
|
|
|
(More precisely, the items returned when iterating over a StreamField are instances of a class `StreamChild`, which provides the `block_type` property as well as `value`.)
|
|
|
|
Experienced Django developers may find it helpful to compare this to the `BoundField` class in Django's forms framework, which represents the pairing of a form field value with its corresponding form field definition, and therefore knows how to render the value as an HTML form field.
|
|
|
|
Most of the time, you won't need to worry about these internal details; Wagtail will use the template rendering wherever you would expect it to. However, there are certain cases where the illusion isn't quite complete - namely, when accessing children of a `ListBlock` or `StructBlock`. In these cases, there is no `BoundBlock` wrapper, and so the item cannot be relied upon to know its own template rendering. For example, consider the following setup, where our `HeadingBlock` is a child of a StructBlock:
|
|
|
|
```python
|
|
class EventBlock(blocks.StructBlock):
|
|
heading = HeadingBlock()
|
|
description = blocks.TextBlock()
|
|
# ...
|
|
|
|
class Meta:
|
|
template = 'blocks/event.html'
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
In `blocks/event.html`:
|
|
|
|
```html+django
|
|
{% load wagtailcore_tags %}
|
|
|
|
<div class="event {% if value.heading == 'Party!' %}lots-of-balloons{% endif %}">
|
|
{% include_block value.heading %}
|
|
- {% include_block value.description %}
|
|
</div>
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
In this case, `value.heading` returns the plain string value rather than a `BoundBlock`; this is necessary because otherwise the comparison in `{% if value.heading == 'Party!' %}` would never succeed. This in turn means that `{% include_block value.heading %}` renders as the plain string, without the `<h1>` tags. To get the HTML rendering, you need to explicitly access the `BoundBlock` instance through `value.bound_blocks.heading`:
|
|
|
|
```html+django
|
|
{% load wagtailcore_tags %}
|
|
|
|
<div class="event {% if value.heading == 'Party!' %}lots-of-balloons{% endif %}">
|
|
{% include_block value.bound_blocks.heading %}
|
|
- {% include_block value.description %}
|
|
</div>
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
In practice, it would probably be more natural and readable to make the `<h1>` tag explicit in the EventBlock's template:
|
|
|
|
```html+django
|
|
{% load wagtailcore_tags %}
|
|
|
|
<div class="event {% if value.heading == 'Party!' %}lots-of-balloons{% endif %}">
|
|
<h1>{{ value.heading }}</h1>
|
|
- {% include_block value.description %}
|
|
</div>
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
This limitation does not apply to StructBlock and StreamBlock values as children of a StructBlock, because Wagtail implements these as complex objects that know their own template rendering, even when not wrapped in a `BoundBlock`. For example, if a StructBlock is nested in another StructBlock, as in:
|
|
|
|
```python
|
|
class EventBlock(blocks.StructBlock):
|
|
heading = HeadingBlock()
|
|
description = blocks.TextBlock()
|
|
guest_speaker = blocks.StructBlock([
|
|
('first_name', blocks.CharBlock()),
|
|
('surname', blocks.CharBlock()),
|
|
('photo', ImageChooserBlock()),
|
|
], template='blocks/speaker.html')
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
then `{% include_block value.guest_speaker %}` within the EventBlock's template will pick up the template rendering from `blocks/speaker.html` as intended.
|
|
|
|
In summary, interactions between BoundBlocks and plain values work according to the following rules:
|
|
|
|
1. When iterating over the value of a StreamField or StreamBlock (as in `{% for block in page.body %}`), you will get back a sequence of BoundBlocks.
|
|
2. If you have a BoundBlock instance, you can access the plain value as `block.value`.
|
|
3. Accessing a child of a StructBlock (as in `value.heading`) will return a plain value; to retrieve the BoundBlock instead, use `value.bound_blocks.heading`.
|
|
4. Likewise, accessing children of a ListBlock (for example `for item in value`) will return plain values; to retrieve BoundBlocks instead, use `value.bound_blocks`.
|
|
5. StructBlock and StreamBlock values always know how to render their own templates, even if you only have the plain value rather than the BoundBlock.
|
|
|
|
```{versionchanged} 2.16
|
|
The value of a ListBlock now provides a `bound_blocks` property; previously it was a plain Python list of child values.
|
|
```
|