Wagtail defaults to serving :class:`~wagtail.wagtailcore.models.Page`-derived models by passing ``self`` to a Django HTML template matching the model's name, but suppose you wanted to serve something other than HTML? You can override the :meth:`~wagtail.wagtailcore.models.Page.serve` method provided by the :class:`~wagtail.wagtailcore.models.Page` class and handle the Django request and response more directly.
Consider this example from the Wagtail demo site's ``models.py``, which serves an ``EventPage`` object as an iCal file if the ``format`` variable is set in the request:
:meth:`~wagtail.wagtailcore.models.Page.serve` takes a Django request object and returns a Django response object. Wagtail returns a ``TemplateResponse`` object with the template and context which it generates, which allows middleware to function as intended, so keep in mind that a simpler response object like a ``HttpResponse`` will not receive these benefits.
Wagtail routes requests by iterating over the path components (separated with a forward slash ``/``), finding matching objects based on their slug, and delegating further routing to that object's model class. The Wagtail source is very instructive in figuring out what's happening. This is the default ``route()`` method of the ``Page`` class:
:meth:`~wagtail.wagtailcore.models.Page.route` takes the current object (``self``), the ``request`` object, and a list of the remaining ``path_components`` from the request URL. It either continues delegating routing by calling :meth:`~wagtail.wagtailcore.models.Page.route` again on one of its children in the Wagtail tree, or ends the routing process by returning a ``RouteResult`` object or raising a 404 error.
The ``RouteResult`` object (defined in wagtail.wagtailcore.url_routing) encapsulates all the information Wagtail needs to call a page's :meth:`~wagtail.wagtailcore.models.Page.serve` method and return a final response: this information consists of the page object, and any additional ``args``/``kwargs`` to be passed to :meth:`~wagtail.wagtailcore.models.Page.serve`.
By overriding the :meth:`~wagtail.wagtailcore.models.Page.route` method, we could create custom endpoints for each object in the Wagtail tree. One use case might be using an alternate template when encountering the ``print/`` endpoint in the path. Another might be a REST API which interacts with the current object. Just to see what's involved, lets make a simple model which prints out all of its child path components.
This model, ``Echoer``, doesn't define any properties, but does subclass ``Page`` so objects will be able to have a custom title and slug. The template just has to display our ``{{ echo }}`` property.
Be careful if you're introducing new required arguments to the ``serve()`` method - Wagtail still needs to be able to display a default view of the page for previewing and moderation, and by default will attempt to do this by calling ``serve()`` with a request object and no further arguments. If your ``serve()`` method does not accept that as a method signature, you will need to override the page's ``serve_preview()`` method to call ``serve()`` with suitable arguments:
Wagtail provides tagging capability through the combination of two django modules, ``taggit`` and ``modelcluster``. ``taggit`` provides a model for tags which is extended by ``modelcluster``, which in turn provides some magical database abstraction which makes drafts and revisions possible in Wagtail. It's a tricky recipe, but the net effect is a many-to-many relationship between your model and a tag class reserved for your model.
Using an example from the Wagtail demo site, here's what the tag model and the relationship field looks like in ``models.py``:
Wagtail's admin provides a nice interface for inputting tags into your content, with typeahead tag completion and friendly tag icons.
Now that we have the many-to-many tag relationship in place, we can fit in a way to render both sides of the relation. Here's more of the Wagtail demo site ``models.py``, where the index model for ``BlogPage`` is extended with logic for filtering the index by tag:
Here, ``blogs.filter(tags__name=tag)`` invokes a reverse Django queryset filter on the ``BlogPageTag`` model to optionally limit the ``BlogPage`` objects sent to the template for rendering. Now, lets render both sides of the relation by showing the tags associated with an object and a way of showing all of the objects associated with each tag. This could be added to the ``blog_page.html`` template:
<a href="{% pageurl self.blog_index %}?tag={{ tag }}">{{ tag }}</a>
{% endfor %}
Iterating through ``self.tags.all`` will display each tag associated with ``self``, while the link(s) back to the index make use of the filter option added to the ``BlogIndexPage`` model. A Django query could also use the ``tagged_items`` related name field to get ``BlogPage`` objects associated with a tag.
This is just one possible way of creating a taxonomy for Wagtail objects. With all of the components for a taxonomy available through Wagtail, you should be able to fulfill even the most exotic taxonomic schemes.