0
0
mirror of https://github.com/sqlite/sqlite.git synced 2024-11-25 08:59:33 +01:00
sqlite/test/limit2.test
drh 6ee5a7b481 Fix multiple issues with the ORDER BY LIMIT optimization. This is the
proposed resolution to ticket [9936b2fa443fec03ff25].

FossilOrigin-Name: 206720129ed2fa8875a286266d05b99fb2caf8671e4b74b26a6286a2073fcd8b
2018-09-08 20:09:46 +00:00

218 lines
7.6 KiB
Plaintext

# 2016-05-20
#
# The author disclaims copyright to this source code. In place of
# a legal notice, here is a blessing:
#
# May you do good and not evil.
# May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others.
# May you share freely, never taking more than you give.
#
#***********************************************************************
# This file implements regression tests for SQLite library. The
# focus of this file is testing the LIMIT in combination with ORDER BY
# and in particular, the optimizations in the inner loop that cause an
# early exit of the inner loop when the LIMIT is reached and the inner
# loop is emitting rows in ORDER BY order.
set testdir [file dirname $argv0]
source $testdir/tester.tcl
set testprefix limit2
do_execsql_test limit2-100 {
CREATE TABLE t1(a,b);
WITH RECURSIVE c(x) AS (VALUES(1) UNION ALL SELECT x+1 FROM c WHERE x<1000)
INSERT INTO t1(a,b) SELECT 1, (x*17)%1000 + 1000 FROM c;
INSERT INTO t1(a,b) VALUES(2,2),(3,1006),(4,4),(5,9999);
CREATE INDEX t1ab ON t1(a,b);
}
set sqlite_search_count 0
do_execsql_test limit2-100.1 {
SELECT a, b, '|' FROM t1 WHERE a IN (2,4,5,3,1) ORDER BY b LIMIT 5;
} {2 2 | 4 4 | 1 1000 | 1 1001 | 1 1002 |}
set fast_count $sqlite_search_count
set sqlite_search_count 0
do_execsql_test limit2-100.2 {
SELECT a, b, '|' FROM t1 WHERE a IN (2,4,5,3,1) ORDER BY +b LIMIT 5;
} {2 2 | 4 4 | 1 1000 | 1 1001 | 1 1002 |}
do_test limit2-100.3 {
set slow_count $sqlite_search_count
expr {$fast_count < 0.02*$slow_count}
} {1}
do_execsql_test limit2-110 {
CREATE TABLE t2(x,y);
INSERT INTO t2(x,y) VALUES('a',1),('a',2),('a',3),('a',4);
INSERT INTO t2(x,y) VALUES('b',1),('c',2),('d',3),('e',4);
CREATE INDEX t2xy ON t2(x,y);
}
set sqlite_search_count 0
do_execsql_test limit2-110.1 {
SELECT a, b, '|' FROM t2, t1 WHERE t2.x='a' AND t1.a=t2.y ORDER BY t1.b LIMIT 5;
} {2 2 | 4 4 | 1 1000 | 1 1001 | 1 1002 |}
set fast_count $sqlite_search_count
set sqlite_search_count 0
do_execsql_test limit2-110.2 {
SELECT a, b, '|' FROM t2, t1 WHERE t2.x='a' AND t1.a=t2.y ORDER BY +t1.b LIMIT 5;
} {2 2 | 4 4 | 1 1000 | 1 1001 | 1 1002 |}
set slow_count $sqlite_search_count
do_test limit2-110.3 {
expr {$fast_count < 0.02*$slow_count}
} {1}
do_execsql_test limit2-120 {
DROP INDEX t1ab;
CREATE INDEX t1ab ON t1(a,b DESC);
}
set sqlite_search_count 0
do_execsql_test limit2-120.1 {
SELECT a, b, '|' FROM t1 WHERE a IN (2,4,5,3,1) ORDER BY b DESC LIMIT 5;
} {5 9999 | 1 1999 | 1 1998 | 1 1997 | 1 1996 |}
set fast_count $sqlite_search_count
set sqlite_search_count 0
do_execsql_test limit2-120.2 {
SELECT a, b, '|' FROM t1 WHERE a IN (2,4,5,3,1) ORDER BY +b DESC LIMIT 5;
} {5 9999 | 1 1999 | 1 1998 | 1 1997 | 1 1996 |}
do_test limit2-120.3 {
set slow_count $sqlite_search_count
expr {$fast_count < 0.02*$slow_count}
} {1}
# Bug report against the new ORDER BY LIMIT optimization just prior to
# release. (Unreleased so there is no ticket).
#
# Make sure the optimization is not applied if the inner loop can only
# provide a single row of output.
#
do_execsql_test limit2-200 {
CREATE TABLE t200(a, b);
WITH RECURSIVE c(x) AS (VALUES(1) UNION ALL SELECT x+1 FROM c WHERE x<1000)
INSERT INTO t200(a,b) SELECT x, x FROM c;
CREATE TABLE t201(x INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, y);
INSERT INTO t201(x,y) VALUES(2,12345);
SELECT *, '|' FROM t200, t201 WHERE x=b ORDER BY y LIMIT 3;
} {2 2 2 12345 |}
do_execsql_test limit2-210 {
SELECT *, '|' FROM t200 LEFT JOIN t201 ON x=b ORDER BY y LIMIT 3;
} {1 1 {} {} | 3 3 {} {} | 4 4 {} {} |}
# Bug in the ORDER BY LIMIT optimization reported on 2016-09-06.
# Ticket https://www.sqlite.org/src/info/559733b09e96
#
do_execsql_test limit2-300 {
CREATE TABLE t300(a,b,c);
CREATE INDEX t300x ON t300(a,b,c);
INSERT INTO t300 VALUES(0,1,99),(0,1,0),(0,0,0);
SELECT *,'.' FROM t300 WHERE a=0 AND (c=0 OR c=99) ORDER BY c DESC;
} {0 1 99 . 0 0 0 . 0 1 0 .}
do_execsql_test limit2-310 {
SELECT *,'.' FROM t300 WHERE a=0 AND (c=0 OR c=99) ORDER BY c DESC LIMIT 1;
} {0 1 99 .}
# Make sure the SELECT loop is ordered correctly for the direction of
# the ORDER BY
#
do_execsql_test limit2-400 {
CREATE TABLE t400(a,b);
CREATE INDEX t400_ab ON t400(a,b);
INSERT INTO t400(a,b) VALUES(1,90),(1,40),(2,80),(2,30),(3,70),(3,20);
SELECT *,'x' FROM t400 WHERE a IN (1,2,3) ORDER BY b DESC LIMIT 3;
SELECT *,'y' FROM t400 WHERE a IN (1,2,3) ORDER BY +b DESC LIMIT 3;
} {1 90 x 2 80 x 3 70 x 1 90 y 2 80 y 3 70 y}
do_execsql_test 500 {
CREATE TABLE t500(i INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, j);
INSERT INTO t500 VALUES(1, 1);
INSERT INTO t500 VALUES(2, 2);
INSERT INTO t500 VALUES(3, 3);
INSERT INTO t500 VALUES(4, 0);
INSERT INTO t500 VALUES(5, 5);
SELECT j FROM t500 WHERE i IN (1,2,3,4,5) ORDER BY j DESC LIMIT 3;
} {5 3 2}
do_execsql_test 501 {
CREATE TABLE t501(i INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, j);
INSERT INTO t501 VALUES(1, 5);
INSERT INTO t501 VALUES(2, 4);
INSERT INTO t501 VALUES(3, 3);
INSERT INTO t501 VALUES(4, 6);
INSERT INTO t501 VALUES(5, 1);
SELECT j FROM t501 WHERE i IN (1,2,3,4,5) ORDER BY j LIMIT 3;
} {1 3 4}
do_execsql_test 502 {
CREATE TABLE t502(i INT PRIMARY KEY, j);
INSERT INTO t502 VALUES(1, 5);
INSERT INTO t502 VALUES(2, 4);
INSERT INTO t502 VALUES(3, 3);
INSERT INTO t502 VALUES(4, 6);
INSERT INTO t502 VALUES(5, 1);
SELECT j FROM t502 WHERE i IN (1,2,3,4,5) ORDER BY j LIMIT 3;
} {1 3 4}
# Ticket https://www.sqlite.org/src/info/123c9ba32130a6c9 2017-12-13
# Incorrect result when an idnex is used for an ordered join.
#
# This test case is in the limit2.test module because the problem was first
# exposed by check-in https://www.sqlite.org/src/info/559733b09e which
# implemented the ORDER BY LIMIT optimization that limit2.test strives to
# test.
#
do_execsql_test 600 {
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS t1;
CREATE TABLE t1(a, b); INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(1,2);
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS t2;
CREATE TABLE t2(x, y); INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(1,3);
CREATE INDEX t1ab ON t1(a,b);
SELECT y FROM t1, t2 WHERE a=x AND b<=y ORDER BY b DESC;
} {3}
# Ticket https://www.sqlite.org/src/info/9936b2fa443fec03 2018-09-08
# Infinite loop due to the ORDER BY LIMIT optimization.
#
do_execsql_test 700 {
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS t1;
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS t2;
CREATE TABLE t1(aa VARCHAR PRIMARY KEY NOT NULL,bb,cc,x VARCHAR(400));
INSERT INTO t1(aa,bb,cc) VALUES('maroon','meal','lecture');
INSERT INTO t1(aa,bb,cc) VALUES('reality','meal','catsear');
CREATE TABLE t2(aa VARCHAR PRIMARY KEY, dd INT DEFAULT 1, ee, x VARCHAR(100));
INSERT INTO t2(aa,dd,ee) VALUES('maroon',0,'travel'),('reality',0,'hour');
CREATE INDEX t2x1 ON t2(dd,ee);
ANALYZE;
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS sqlite_stat4;
DELETE FROM sqlite_stat1;
INSERT INTO sqlite_stat1 VALUES
('t2','t2x1','3 3 3'),
('t2','sqlite_autoindex_t2_1','3 1'),
('t1','sqlite_autoindex_t1_1','2 1');
ANALYZE sqlite_master;
SELECT *
FROM t1 LEFT JOIN t2 ON t1.aa=t2.aa
WHERE t1.bb='meal'
ORDER BY t2.dd DESC
LIMIT 1;
} {maroon meal lecture {} maroon 0 travel {}}
do_execsql_test 710 {
DROP TABLE t1;
DROP TABLE t2;
CREATE TABLE t1(aa, bb);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES('maroon','meal');
CREATE TABLE t2(cc, dd, ee, x VARCHAR(100));
INSERT INTO t2(cc,dd,ee) VALUES('maroon',1,'one');
INSERT INTO t2(cc,dd,ee) VALUES('maroon',2,'two');
INSERT INTO t2(cc,dd,ee) VALUES('maroon',0,'zero');
CREATE INDEX t2ddee ON t2(dd,ee);
CREATE INDEX t2cc ON t2(cc);
ANALYZE;
SELECT t2.cc, t2.dd, t2.ee FROM t1 CROSS JOIN t2 ON t1.aa=t2.cc
ORDER BY t2.dd LIMIT 1;
} {maroon 0 zero}
do_execsql_test 720 {
SELECT t2.cc, t2.dd, t2.ee FROM t1 CROSS JOIN t2 ON t1.aa=t2.cc
WHERE t1.bb='meal'
ORDER BY t2.dd LIMIT 1;
} {maroon 0 zero}
finish_test