Mention FusedIterator case in Iterator::fuse doc
Using `fuse` on an iterator that incorrectly implements
`FusedIterator` does not fuse the iterator. This commit adds a
note about this in the documentation of this method to increase
awareness about this potential issue (esp. when relying on fuse
in unsafe code).
Closes #83969
implement `TrustedRandomAccess` for `Take` iterator adapter
`TrustedRandomAccess` requires the iterator length to fit within `usize`. `take(n)` only constrains the upper bound of an iterator. So if the inner is `TrustedRandomAccess` (which already implies a finite length) then so can be `Take`.
```````@rustbot``````` label T-libs-impl
Move `sys_common::poison` to `sync::poison`
`sys_common` should not contain publicly exported types, only platform-independent abstractions on top of `sys`, which `sys_common::poison` is not. There is thus no reason for the module to not live under `sync`.
Part of #84187.
Remove duplicated fn(Box<[T]>) -> Vec<T>
`<[T]>::into_vec()` does the same thing as `Vec::from::<Box<[T]>>()`, so they can be implemented in terms of each other. This was the previous implementation of `Vec::from()`, but was changed in #78461. I'm not sure what the rationale was for that change, but it seems preferable to maintain a single implementation.
Improve `Iterator::by_ref` example
I split the example into two: one that fails to compile, and one that
works. I also made them identical except for the addition of `by_ref`
so we don't confuse readers with random differences.
cc `@steveklabnik,` who is the one that added the previous version of this example
Using `fuse` on an iterator that incorrectly implements
`FusedIterator` does not fuse the iterator. This commit adds a
note about this in the documentation of this method to increase
awareness about this potential issue (esp. when relying on fuse
in unsafe code).
Added CharIndices::offset function
The CharIndices iterator has a field internally called front_offset, that I think would be very useful to have access to.
You can already do something like ``char_indices.next().map(|(offset, _)| offset)``, but that is wordy, in addition to not handling the case where the iterator has ended, where you'd want the offset to be equal to the length.
I'm very new to the open source world and the rust repository, so I'm sorry if I missed a step or did something weird.
Improve rebuilding behaviour of BinaryHeap::retain.
This changes `BinaryHeap::retain` such that it doesn't always fully rebuild the heap, but only rebuilds the parts for which that's necessary.
This makes use of the fact that retain gives out `&T`s and not `&mut T`s.
Retaining every element or removing only elements at the end results in no rebuilding at all. Retaining most elements results in only reordering the elements that got moved (those after the first removed element), using the same logic as was already used for `append`.
cc `@KodrAus` `@sfackler` - We briefly discussed this possibility in the meeting last week while we talked about stabilization of this function (#71503).
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #84343 (Remove `ScopeTree::closure_tree`)
- #84376 (Uses flex to fix formatting of h1 at any width)
- #84377 (Followup to #83944)
- #84396 (Update LLVM submodule)
- #84402 (Move `sys_common::rwlock::StaticRWLock` etc. to `sys::unix::rwlock`)
- #84404 (Check for intrinsics before coercing to a function pointer)
- #84413 (Remove `sys::args::Args::inner_debug` and use `Debug` instead)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Remove `sys::args::Args::inner_debug` and use `Debug` instead
This removes the method `sys::args::Args::inner_debug` on all platforms and implements `Debug` for `Args` instead.
I believe this creates a more natural API for the different platforms under `sys`: export a type `Args: Debug + Iterator + ...` vs. `Args: Iterator + ...` and with a method `inner_debug`.
Move `sys_common::rwlock::StaticRWLock` etc. to `sys::unix::rwlock`
This moves `sys_common::rwlock::StaticRwLock`, `RWLockReadGuard` and `RWLockWriteGuard` to `sys::unix::rwlock`. They are already `#[cfg(unix)]` and don't need to be in `sys_common`.
Implement indexing slices with pairs of core::ops::Bound<usize>
Closes #49976.
I am not sure about code duplication between `check_range` and `into_maybe_range`. Should be former implemented in terms of the latter? Also this PR doesn't address code duplication between `impl SliceIndex for Range*`.
Format `Struct { .. }` on one line even with `{:#?}`.
The result of `debug_struct("A").finish_non_exhaustive()` before this change:
```
A {
..
}
```
And after this change:
```
A { .. }
```
If there's any fields, the result stays unchanged:
```
A {
field: value,
..
}
fix 'const-stable since' for NonZeroU*::new_unchecked
For the unsigned `NonZero` types, `new_unchecked` was const-stable from the start with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/50808. Fix the docs to accurately reflect that.
I think this `since` is also incorrect:
```rust
#[stable(feature = "from_nonzero", since = "1.31.0")]
impl From<$Ty> for $Int {
```
The signed nonzero types were only stabilized in 1.34, so that `From` impl certainly didn't exist before. But I had enough of digging through git histories after I figured out when `new_unchecked` became const-stable...^^
Replace `Void` in `sys` with never type
This PR replaces several occurrences in `sys` of the type `enum Void {}` with the Rust never type (`!`).
The name `Void` is unfortunate because in other languages (C etc.) it refers to a unit type, not an uninhabited type.
Note that the previous stabilization of the never type was reverted, however all uses here are implementation details and not publicly visible.
Move `sys::vxworks` code to `sys::unix`
Follow-up to #77666, `sys::vxworks` is almost identical to `sys::unix`, the only differences are the `rand`, `thread_local_dtor`, and `process` implementation. Since `vxworks` is `target_family = unix` anyway, there is no reason for the code not to live inside of `sys::unix` like all the other unix-OSes.
e41f378f82/compiler/rustc_target/src/spec/vxworks_base.rs (L12)
``@rustbot`` label: +T-libs-impl
Replace all `fmt.pad` with `debug_struct`
This replaces any occurrence of:
- `f.pad("X")` with `f.debug_struct("X").finish()`
- `f.pad("X { .. }")` with `f.debug_struct("X").finish_non_exhaustive()`
This is in line with existing formatting code such as
1255053067/library/std/src/sync/mpsc/mod.rs (L1470-L1475)
Add `Unsupported` to `std::io::ErrorKind`
I noticed a significant portion of the uses of `ErrorKind::Other` in std is for unsupported operations.
The notion that a specific operation is not available on a target (and will thus never succeed) seems semantically distinct enough from just "an unspecified error occurred", which is why I am proposing to add the variant `Unsupported` to `std::io::ErrorKind`.
**Implementation**:
The following variant will be added to `std::io::ErrorKind`:
```rust
/// This operation is unsupported on this platform.
Unsupported
```
`std::io::ErrorKind::Unsupported` is an error returned when a given operation is not supported on a platform, and will thus never succeed; there is no way for the software to recover. It will be used instead of `Other` where appropriate, e.g. on wasm for file and network operations.
`decode_error_kind` will be updated to decode operating system errors to `Unsupported`:
- Unix and VxWorks: `libc::ENOSYS`
- Windows: `c::ERROR_CALL_NOT_IMPLEMENTED`
- WASI: `wasi::ERRNO_NOSYS`
**Stability**:
This changes the kind of error returned by some functions on some platforms, which I think is not covered by the stability guarantees of the std? User code could depend on this behavior, expecting `ErrorKind::Other`, however the docs already mention:
> Errors that are `Other` now may move to a different or a new `ErrorKind` variant in the future. It is not recommended to match an error against `Other` and to expect any additional characteristics, e.g., a specific `Error::raw_os_error` return value.
The most recent variant added to `ErrorKind` was `UnexpectedEof` in `1.6.0` (almost 5 years ago), but `ErrorKind` is marked as `#[non_exhaustive]` and the docs warn about exhaustively matching on it, so adding a new variant per se should not be a breaking change.
The variant `Unsupported` itself could be marked as `#[unstable]`, however, because this PR also immediately uses this new variant and changes the errors returned by functions I'm inclined to agree with the others in this thread that the variant should be insta-stabilized.
