0
0
mirror of https://github.com/nodejs/node.git synced 2024-11-29 15:06:33 +01:00
nodejs/doc/onboarding-extras.md
Rich Trott dce6d53e6b doc: move upstream information to onboarding doc
Move information about setting `upstream` remote and updating from
`upstream` out of `onboarding-extras` and into `onboarding`. Previously,
a link was provided in `onboarding` to the section. This puts all the
git setup information for Collaborator onboardings in one place.

PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/21029
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <me@jonathanmoss.me>
Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <vsemozhetbyt@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
2018-06-01 14:01:10 +02:00

86 lines
3.0 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

# Additional Onboarding Information
## Labels
### Subsystems
* `lib/*.js` (`assert`, `buffer`, etc.)
* `build`
* `doc`
* `lib / src`
* `test`
* `tools`
There may be more than one subsystem valid for any particular issue or pull
request.
### General
* `confirmed-bug` - Bugs you have verified exist
* `discuss` - Things that need larger discussion
* `feature request` - Any issue that requests a new feature (usually not PRs)
* `good first issue` - Issues suitable for newcomers to process
* `meta` - For issues whose topic is governance, policies, procedures, etc.
--
* `semver-{minor,major}`
* be conservative that is, if a change has the remote *chance* of breaking
something, go for semver-major
* when adding a semver label, add a comment explaining why you're adding it
* minor vs. patch: roughly: "does it add a new method / does it add a new
section to the docs"
* major vs. everything else: run last versions tests against this version, if
they pass, **probably** minor or patch
* A breaking change helper
([full source](https://gist.github.com/chrisdickinson/ba532fa0e4e243fb7b44)):
```sh
SHOW=$(git show-ref -d $(git describe --abbrev=0) | tail -n1 | awk '{print $1}')
git checkout $(git show -s --pretty='%T' $SHOW) -- test
make -j4 test
```
### LTS/Version labels
We use labels to keep track of which branches a commit should land on:
* `dont-land-on-v?.x`
* For changes that do not apply to a certain release line
* Also used when the work of backporting a change outweighs the benefits
* `land-on-v?.x`
* Used by releasers to mark a PR as scheduled for inclusion in an LTS release
* Applied to the original PR for clean cherry-picks, to the backport PR
otherwise
* `backport-requested-v?.x`
* Used to indicate that a PR needs a manual backport to a branch in order to
land the changes on that branch
* Typically applied by a releaser when the PR does not apply cleanly or it
breaks the tests after applying
* Will be replaced by either `dont-land-on-v?.x` or `backported-to-v?.x`
* `backported-to-v?.x`
* Applied to PRs for which a backport PR has been merged
* `lts-watch-v?.x`
* Applied to PRs which the LTS working group should consider including in a
LTS release
* Does not indicate that any specific action will be taken, but can be
effective as messaging to non-collaborators
* `lts-agenda`
* For things that need discussion by the LTS working group
* (for example semver-minor changes that need or should go into an LTS
release)
* `v?.x`
* Automatically applied to changes that do not target `master` but rather the
`v?.x-staging` branch
Once a release line enters maintenance mode, the corresponding labels do not
need to be attached anymore, as only important bugfixes will be included.
### Other Labels
* Operating system labels
* `macos`, `windows`, `smartos`, `aix`
* No linux, linux is the implied default
* Architecture labels
* `arm`, `mips`, `s390`, `ppc`
* No x86{_64}, since that is the implied default