mirror of
https://github.com/nodejs/node.git
synced 2024-11-30 15:30:56 +01:00
a69ab27ab4
This commit replaces instances of io.js with Node.js, based on the recent convergence. There are some remaining instances of io.js, related to build and the installer. Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/2361 PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/2367 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: João Reis <reis@janeasystems.com>
136 lines
5.5 KiB
Markdown
136 lines
5.5 KiB
Markdown
# Node.js Project Governance
|
|
|
|
## Technical Committee
|
|
|
|
The Node.js project is jointly governed by a Technical Steering Committee (TSC)
|
|
which is responsible for high-level guidance of the project.
|
|
|
|
The TSC has final authority over this project including:
|
|
|
|
* Technical direction
|
|
* Project governance and process (including this policy)
|
|
* Contribution policy
|
|
* GitHub repository hosting
|
|
* Conduct guidelines
|
|
* Maintaining the list of additional Collaborators
|
|
|
|
Initial membership invitations to the TSC were given to individuals who
|
|
had been active contributors to Node.js, and who have significant
|
|
experience with the management of the Node.js project. Membership is
|
|
expected to evolve over time according to the needs of the project.
|
|
|
|
For the current list of TSC members, see the project
|
|
[README.md](./README.md#current-project-team-members).
|
|
|
|
## Collaborators
|
|
|
|
The [nodejs/node](https://github.com/nodejs/node) GitHub repository is
|
|
maintained by the TC and additional Collaborators who are added by the
|
|
TC on an ongoing basis.
|
|
|
|
Individuals making significant and valuable contributions are made
|
|
Collaborators and given commit-access to the project. These
|
|
individuals are identified by the TC and their addition as
|
|
Collaborators is discussed during the weekly TC meeting.
|
|
|
|
_Note:_ If you make a significant contribution and are not considered
|
|
for commit-access, log an issue or contact a TC member directly and it
|
|
will be brought up in the next TC meeting.
|
|
|
|
Modifications of the contents of the nodejs/node repository are made on
|
|
a collaborative basis. Anybody with a GitHub account may propose a
|
|
modification via pull request and it will be considered by the project
|
|
Collaborators. All pull requests must be reviewed and accepted by a
|
|
Collaborator with sufficient expertise who is able to take full
|
|
responsibility for the change. In the case of pull requests proposed
|
|
by an existing Collaborator, an additional Collaborator is required
|
|
for sign-off. Consensus should be sought if additional Collaborators
|
|
participate and there is disagreement around a particular
|
|
modification. See _Consensus Seeking Process_ below for further detail
|
|
on the consensus model used for governance.
|
|
|
|
Collaborators may opt to elevate significant or controversial
|
|
modifications, or modifications that have not found consensus to the
|
|
TC for discussion by assigning the ***tc-agenda*** tag to a pull
|
|
request or issue. The TC should serve as the final arbiter where
|
|
required.
|
|
|
|
For the current list of Collaborators, see the project
|
|
[README.md](./README.md#current-project-team-members).
|
|
|
|
A guide for Collaborators is maintained in
|
|
[COLLABORATOR_GUIDE.md](./COLLABORATOR_GUIDE.md).
|
|
|
|
## TC Membership
|
|
|
|
TC seats are not time-limited. There is no fixed size of the TC.
|
|
However, the expected target is between 6 and 12, to ensure adequate
|
|
coverage of important areas of expertise, balanced with the ability to
|
|
make decisions efficiently.
|
|
|
|
There is no specific set of requirements or qualifications for TC
|
|
membership beyond these rules.
|
|
|
|
The TC may add additional members to the TC by a standard TC motion.
|
|
|
|
A TC member may be removed from the TC by voluntary resignation, or by
|
|
a standard TC motion.
|
|
|
|
Changes to TC membership should be posted in the agenda, and may be
|
|
suggested as any other agenda item (see "TC Meetings" below).
|
|
|
|
No more than 1/3 of the TC members may be affiliated with the same
|
|
employer. If removal or resignation of a TC member, or a change of
|
|
employment by a TC member, creates a situation where more than 1/3 of
|
|
the TC membership shares an employer, then the situation must be
|
|
immediately remedied by the resignation or removal of one or more TC
|
|
members affiliated with the over-represented employer(s).
|
|
|
|
## TC Meetings
|
|
|
|
The TC meets weekly on a Google Hangout On Air. The meeting is run by
|
|
a designated moderator approved by the TC. Each meeting should be
|
|
published to YouTube.
|
|
|
|
Items are added to the TC agenda which are considered contentious or
|
|
are modifications of governance, contribution policy, TC membership,
|
|
or release process.
|
|
|
|
The intention of the agenda is not to approve or review all patches.
|
|
That should happen continuously on GitHub and be handled by the larger
|
|
group of Collaborators.
|
|
|
|
Any community member or contributor can ask that something be added to
|
|
the next meeting's agenda by logging a GitHub Issue. Any Collaborator,
|
|
TC member or the moderator can add the item to the agenda by adding
|
|
the ***tc-agenda*** tag to the issue.
|
|
|
|
Prior to each TC meeting, the moderator will share the Agenda with
|
|
members of the TC. TC members can add any items they like to the
|
|
agenda at the beginning of each meeting. The moderator and the TC
|
|
cannot veto or remove items.
|
|
|
|
The TC may invite persons or representatives from certain projects to
|
|
participate in a non-voting capacity. These invitees currently are:
|
|
|
|
* A representative from [build](https://github.com/node-forward/build)
|
|
chosen by that project.
|
|
|
|
The moderator is responsible for summarizing the discussion of each
|
|
agenda item and sending it as a pull request after the meeting.
|
|
|
|
## Consensus Seeking Process
|
|
|
|
The TC follows a
|
|
[Consensus Seeking](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consensus-seeking_decision-making)
|
|
decision making model.
|
|
|
|
When an agenda item has appeared to reach a consensus, the moderator
|
|
will ask "Does anyone object?" as a final call for dissent from the
|
|
consensus.
|
|
|
|
If an agenda item cannot reach a consensus, a TC member can call for
|
|
either a closing vote or a vote to table the issue to the next
|
|
meeting. The call for a vote must be approved by a majority of the TC
|
|
or else the discussion will continue. Simple majority wins.
|