This change removes "new" as a description for `Buffer` construction
methods. They are arguably not "new" anymore and they certainly won't be
"new" anymore at some point.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/19687
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tiancheng "Timothy" Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Сковорода Никита Андреевич <chalkerx@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Nikolai Vavilov <vvnicholas@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <vsemozhetbyt@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
This commit adds a deprecation code to expectWarning and updates the
function to check the passed code against the code property on the
warning object.
Not all warnings have a deprecation code so for those that don't an
explicit code of common.noWarnCode is required. Passing this skips the
assertion of the code.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/19474
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
Code for the new --pending-deprecation flag contains logic to make sure
the deprecation warning is emitted only once. However, this was not
being tested. Add test coverage for this situation.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/12527
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
The pending deprecation warning is off by default.
Launch the node process with --pending-deprecation
or NODE_PENDING_DEPRECATION=1 env var set.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/11968
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Сковорода Никита Андреевич <chalkerx@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
