currentId is renamed to executionAsyncId
triggerId is renamed to triggerAsyncId
AsyncResource.triggerId is renamed to AsyncResource.triggerAsyncId
AsyncHooksGetCurrentId is renamed to AsyncHooksGetExecutionAsyncId
AsyncHooksGetTriggerId is renamed to AsyncHooksGetTriggerAsyncId
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/13490
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <trev.norris@gmail.com>
Improve error messages in the async hooks tests, mostly by removing
unhelpful `message` parameters for assertions.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/13243
Reviewed-By: Kunal Pathak <kunal.pathak@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-By: Andreas Madsen <amwebdk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <trev.norris@gmail.com>
Calling the destroy callbacks in a uv_idle_t causes a timing issue where
if a handle or request is closed then the class isn't deleted until
uv_close() callbacks are called (which happens after the poll phase).
This results in some destroy callbacks not being called just before the
application exits. So instead switch the destroy callbacks to be called
in a uv_timer_t with the timeout set to zero.
When uv_run() is called with UV_RUN_ONCE the final operation of the
event loop is to process all remaining timers. By setting the timeout to
zero it results in the destroy callbacks being processed after
uv_close() but before uv_run() returned. Processing the destroyed ids
that were previously missed.
Also, process the destroy_ids_list() in a do {} while() loop that makes
sure the vector is empty before returning. Which also makes running
clear() unnecessary.
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/13262
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/13369
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Andreas Madsen <amwebdk@gmail.com>
Async wrap providers tested:
- crypto.randomBytes
- crypto.pbkdf2
- fs event wrap
- fsreqwrap access
- fsreqwrap readFile
- getaddrinforeq wrap
- getnameinforeq wrap
- pipe connect wrap
- query wrap
- pipewrap
- processwrap
- shutdown wrap
- tcpwrap
- udpwrap
- send wrap
- detailed signal wrap
- statwatcher
- timerwrap via setTimeout
- timerwrap via setInterval
- for Immediate
- http parser request
- http parser response
- connection via ssl server
- tls wrap
- write wrap
- ttywrap via readstream
- ttywrap via wriream
- zctx via zlib binding deflate
Embedder API:
- async-event tests
- one test looks at the happy paths
- another ensures that in cases of events emitted in an order that
doesn't make sense, the order is enforced by async hooks throwing a
meaningful error
- embedder enforcement tests are split up since async hook stack
corruption now the process
- therefore we launch a child and check for error output of the offending code
Additional tests:
- tests that show that we can enable/disable hooks inside their lifetime
events
- tests that verify the graph of resources triggering the creation of
other resources
Test Helpers:
- init-hooks:
- returns one collector instance
- when created an async hook is created and the lifetime events are
registered to call the appropriate collector functions
- the collector also exposes `enable` and `disable` functions which call
through to the async hook
- hook checks:
- checks invocations of life time hooks against the actual invocations
that were collected
- in some cases like `destroy` a min/max range of invocations can be
supplied since in these cases the exact number is non-deterministic
- verify graph:
- verifies the triggerIds of specific async resources are as expected,
i.e. the creation of resources was triggered by the resource we expect
- includes a printGraph function to generate easily readable test
input for verify graph
- both functions prune TickObjects to create less brittle and easier
to understand tests
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/12892
Ref: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/11883
Ref: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/8531
Reviewed-By: Andreas Madsen <amwebdk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Sam Roberts <vieuxtech@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com>
