Previously a sync writable receiving chunks
larger than highwatermark would unecessarily
ping pong needDrain.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/32887
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/31624
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Currently we only consider write when benchmarking.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/31066
Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <shishugi@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Make manywrites benchmark a bit more realistic by
taking back pressure into account. Otherwise
memory usage would no correspond well with
real world usage.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/30977
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Improve performance and reduce memory usage when a writable stream
is written to with the same callback (which is the most common case)
and when the write operation finishes synchronously (which is also
often the case).
confidence improvement accuracy (*) (**) (***)
streams/writable-manywrites.js sync='no' n=2000000 0.99 % ±3.20% ±4.28% ±5.61%
streams/writable-manywrites.js sync='yes' n=2000000 *** 710.69 % ±19.65% ±26.47% ±35.09%
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/18013
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/18367
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/30710
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
These changes result in ~50% improvement in the included benchmark.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/10580
Reviewed-By: Сковорода Никита Андреевич <chalkerx@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
