Previously a sync writable receiving chunks
larger than highwatermark would unecessarily
ping pong needDrain.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/32887
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/31624
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Currently we only consider write when benchmarking.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/31066
Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <shishugi@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Make manywrites benchmark a bit more realistic by
taking back pressure into account. Otherwise
memory usage would no correspond well with
real world usage.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/30977
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Improve performance and reduce memory usage when a writable stream
is written to with the same callback (which is the most common case)
and when the write operation finishes synchronously (which is also
often the case).
confidence improvement accuracy (*) (**) (***)
streams/writable-manywrites.js sync='no' n=2000000 0.99 % ±3.20% ±4.28% ±5.61%
streams/writable-manywrites.js sync='yes' n=2000000 *** 710.69 % ±19.65% ±26.47% ±35.09%
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/18013
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/18367
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/30710
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/21712
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Tiancheng "Timothy" Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Weijia Wang <starkwang@126.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <me@jonathanmoss.me>
For tests / benchmarks that are creating Buffer instances for
any reason other than to test Buffer constructor, use the new
Buffer.alloc/Buffer.from API instead of the deprecated API.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/18980
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Daijiro Wachi <daijiro.wachi@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
This removes all instances of %OptimizeFunctionOnNextCall from streams
benchmarks
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/9615
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
These changes result in ~50% improvement in the included benchmark.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/10580
Reviewed-By: Сковорода Никита Андреевич <chalkerx@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
read() performance is improved most by switching from an array to
a linked list for storing buffered data. However, other changes that
also contribute include: making some hot functions inlinable, faster
read() argument checking, and misc code rearrangement to avoid
unnecessary code execution.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/7077
Reviewed-By: Calvin Metcalf <calvin.metcalf@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
