In benchmark directory this changes for loops
using var to let when it applies for consistency
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/28958
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Upcoming lint rule will require a blank line between consecutive
functions. Add it in the places where we don't have it already.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/30696
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <shishugi@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Using Reflect.apply where the callback context does not need
to change is unnecessary and less performant.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/27349
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Code in benchmark directory sometimes uses `function () {}` for
anonymous callbacks and sometimes uses `() => {}`. Multi-line arrays
sometimes have a trailing comma and sometimes do not. Update to always
use arrow functions for anonymous callbacks and trailing commas for
multiline arrays.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/25944
Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <anto.aravinth.cse@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
In order to better match the browser behaviour, run nextTicks (and
subsequently the microtask queue) after each individual Timer and
Immediate, rather than after the whole list is processed. The
current behaviour is somewhat of a performance micro-optimization
and also partly dictated by how timer handles were implemented.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/22842
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/22257
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host>
Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Hang all timer lists off a single TimerWrap and use the PriorityQueue
to manage expiration priorities. This makes the Timers code clearer,
consumes significantly less resources and improves performance.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/20555
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/16105
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Instead of using kOnTimeout index to track a special list
processing function, just pass in a function to C++ at
startup that executes all handles and determines which
function to call.
This change improves the performance of unpooled timeouts
by roughly 20%, as well as makes the unref/ref processing
easier to follow.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/18582
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Vladimir de Turckheim <vlad2t@hotmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com>
Remove micro-optimizations that no longer yield any benefits,
restructure timers & immediates to be a bit more straightforward.
Adjust timers benchmarks to run long enough to offer meaningful data.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/17279
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Timothy Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com>
The immediate.js benchmark with `type` set to `depth` measures the same
thing as set-immediate-depth.js. Remove the redundancy.`
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/13009
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/11010
Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
The depth benchmark for timers sets a timer that sets a timer that sets
a timer that... 500K of them.
Since each timer has to wait for the next tick of the event loop this
benchmark takes a very long time to run compared to the breadth
test that is already in the file. This may be more of an event loop
benchmark than a timer benchmark.
Reduce the number of iterations for the depth test as it's really just
running the iterations in sequence, not in parallel. And even on an
infinitely fast machine, it would take over 8 minutes to run because
each tick of the event loop would have to wait 1ms before firing the
timer.
Split the depth and breadth benchmarks so that their `N` values can be
set independently.
Do some minor refactoring to the benchmarks (but no ES6 additions so
that the benchmarks can still be run with old versions of Node.js).
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/9493
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/9497
Reviewed-By: Andreas Madsen <amwebdk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com>
Timings for sequential and concurren setImmediate() with and without
arguments, and set + clearImmediate().
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/6436
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com>
