0
0
mirror of https://github.com/nodejs/node.git synced 2024-11-30 15:30:56 +01:00
Commit Graph

12 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Benjamin Gruenbaum
d68f946fe4 test: remove unused config
process.maxTickDepth was removed in v0.12 a whole while ago and was
mostly removed from our code base. There are still some places it was
left in old benchmarks and tests.

This PR removes setting the value in those tests and
benchmarks.

PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/21985
Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <apapirovski@mac.com>
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <me@jonathanmoss.me>
2018-08-02 22:33:51 -04:00
Anatoli Papirovski
34bd9f318a
benchmark: track exec time in next-tick-exec
The next-tick-exec benchmarks were meant to track nextTick execution
time but due to an error, they actually track addition and execution.

PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/20462
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
2018-05-06 07:29:47 +02:00
Anatoli Papirovski
a957f248ae
benchmark: fix next-tick-depth
A recent change made these benchmarks fail by always finishing
with 0 iterations. Restore a counter variable.

PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/20461
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
2018-05-03 07:14:40 +02:00
juggernaut451
b80da63b99
benchmark: changed millions and thousands to n
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/18917
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/18778
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Weijia Wang <starkwang@126.com>
Reviewed-By: Andreas Madsen <amwebdk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <apapirovski@mac.com>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
2018-04-10 00:22:33 +02:00
Ruben Bridgewater
d163a6b8c2
benchmark: (process) use destructuring
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/18250
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
2018-01-23 01:29:22 +01:00
Anatoli Papirovski
cbaf59c5b9
process: slightly simplify next tick execution
Get rid of separate function to call callback from _tickCallback as
it no longer yields worthwhile performance improvement.

Move some code from nextTick & internalNextTick into TickObject
constructor to minimize duplication.

PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/16888
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Timothy Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com>
2017-11-28 08:48:30 -05:00
Ruben Bridgewater
e167ab71fb
benchmark: var to const
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/13757
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
2017-09-19 21:14:38 -03:00
Rich Trott
97c43940c8 benchmark: cover more nextTick() code
The benchmarks for `process.nextTick()` do not cover the `default` case
in the internal code's `switch` statement where the callback receives
more than 3 arguments. Modify two of the benchmarks to include this
condition.

PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/14645
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
2017-08-10 09:11:50 -07:00
Brian White
460ee75f7e
process: improve nextTick() performance
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/13446
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com>
2017-06-17 10:38:24 -04:00
Brian White
f385f77f1d process: improve memoryUsage() performance
Creating an object in JS and using a typed array to transfer values
from C++ to JS is faster than creating an object and setting
properties in C++.

The included benchmark shows ~34% increase in performance with this
change.

PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/11497
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
2017-02-23 17:19:39 -08:00
Joyee Cheung
a647d82f83 process: improve process.hrtime
* Add benchmarks for diffing a previous result
* Improvements to the documentation, including type annotation
* Update the outdated comments in src/node.cc, improve comments
  in lib/internal/process.js
* Check the argument is an Array Tuple with length 2

PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/10764
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Brian White <mscdex@mscdex.net>
2017-01-23 21:30:18 +08:00
Andreas Madsen
d9079ab801 benchmark: move misc to categorized directories
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/5177
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
2016-02-26 20:28:45 +11:00