This is in preparation for a markdown lint rule requiring lines to be
wrapped at 80 characters.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/24094
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/23978
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <vsemozhetbyt@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Currently, changes require approval by one Collaborator in most cases.
However there are situations where two approvals are required. For
example, breaking changes require two approvals from TSC members. And
fast-tracking a request requires two approvals.
Additionally, although only one approval is strictly required, in
practice, we nearly always seek a second approval when there is only
one.
Lastly, concerns have been raised about (perhaps unintentionally) gaming
the one-approval system by suggesting a change to someone else, and then
approving that change when the user submits a pull request. This
resolves (or at least mitigates) that concern.
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/19564
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/22255
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/19564
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Сковорода Никита Андреевич <chalkerx@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matheus Marchini <mat@mmarchini.me>
Reviewed-By: Bryan English <bryan@bryanenglish.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: John-David Dalton <john.david.dalton@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <me@jonathanmoss.me>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ujjwal Sharma <usharma1998@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Roman Reiss <me@silverwind.io>
Reviewed-By: George Adams <george.adams@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <apapirovski@mac.com>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <myles.borins@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/18829
Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <vsemozhetbyt@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <me@jonathanmoss.me>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Expand definition of Collaborator to include individuals
with commit access to any Node.js GitHub repository.
Clarify the kinds of things that should be considered when
considering inviting new collaborators
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/14981
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Yuta Hiroto <hello@about-hiroppy.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Put information about Collaborators in GOVERNANCE.md before information
about the CTC. For most things, the CTC is the last place to go, not the
first and Collaborators have a lot of decision-making power in the
project. The governance doc should reflect that.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/13423
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com>
Include a high-level explanation of how Collaborators are identified for
Emeritus status. This is intended to supply the minimum amount of
information to being assigning Emeritus status to inactive
Collaborators. The documentation may be expanded subsequently.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/13421
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
Incorporate note into main text.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/13420
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
The doc says that the CTC moderator is responsible for taking minutes.
This change updates the doc to say that the moderator is responsible for
making sure that notes are taken, but not necessarily taking the notes
themselves.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/9425
Reviewed-By: Josh Gavant <josh.gavant@outlook.com>
Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
The governance documentation refers to a CTC meeting "moderator" but
that is a confusing term. "Meeting chair" seems more correctly
descriptive. Change instances of "moderator" to "meeting chair".
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/CTC/issues/23
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/9432
Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Josh Gavant <josh.gavant@outlook.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Сковорода Никита Андреевич <chalkerx@gmail.com>
At the CTC meeting today, Sakthipriyan noted that there was a link to
the CTC consensus material from the pull request consensus material. The
link was confusing because the CTC consensus material is
meeting-specific, which does not apply to pull requests. I have removed
that link and replaced it with a text explanation.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/9073
Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <myles.borins@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
As the CTC grows and has representation from more time zones, we need to
embrace asynchronous decision making and rely less on the actual
meeting. This change is a proposal for that which, ironically, probably
has to be approved at a meeting.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/8945
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Julien Gilli <jgilli@nodejs.org>
Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
Reviewed-By: Shigeki Ohtsu <ohtsu@ohtsu.org>
Add language identifying a request for voluntary resignation as the
typical mechanism for addressing inactive CTC members.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/7720
Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
Reviewed-By: Сковорода Никита Андреевич <chalkerx@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <fedor.indutny@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com>
Reviewed-By: Shigeki Ohtsu <ohtsu@iij.ad.jp>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Brian White <mscdex@mscdex.net>
Reviewed-By: Julien Gilli <jgilli@nodejs.org>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Provide example activities to better distinguish Collaborator activities
from CTC member activities.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/7744
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Julien Gilli <jgilli@nodejs.org>
CTC quorum rules were not in writing. There was an informal
understanding between CTC members. Document the rules to avoid
differences in interpretation.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/7813
Reviewed-By: Сковорода Никита Андреевич <chalkerx@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Julien Gilli <jgilli@nodejs.org>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/5879
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/5304
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
This commit replaces instances of io.js with Node.js, based on the
recent convergence. There are some remaining instances of io.js,
related to build and the installer.
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/2361
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/2367
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: João Reis <reis@janeasystems.com>
This changes TC addition to a standard TC motion instead
of requiring unanimous consent of all members.
PR-URL: https://github.com/iojs/io.js/pull/677
Reviewed-By: Chris Dickinson <christopher.s.dickinson@gmail.com>
- clarified the role of "collaborators"
- split out a governance doc
- split out a collaborator guide
- cleaned up the contributing doc
- cleaned up the readme & added collaborators list
PR-URL: https://github.com/iojs/io.js/pull/233
Reviewed-By: Chris Dickinson <christopher.s.dickinson@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Mikeal Rogers <mikeal.rogers@gmail.com>
(Note: no explicit "LGTM" from Mikeal)
Discussed at TC meeting 2015-01-07, agreed to push further
amendments to governance to future PRs.
