Simplify text/content.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/23990
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <vsemozhetbyt@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Rewrite the Consensus Seeking section of the Collaborators Guide for
easier reading, more clarity, shorter sentences, less passive voice,
etc.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/23349
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <vsemozhetbyt@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Franziska Hinkelmann <franziska.hinkelmann@gmail.com>
Currently, we have a 72 rule for how many hours a pull request should
be left open at a minimum. Reduce that time to 48 hours.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/23082
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <shishugi@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Franziska Hinkelmann <franziska.hinkelmann@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <apapirovski@mac.com>
Currently, we have a 48/72 rule for how many hours a pull request should
be left open at a minimum. Unfortunately, whether a pull request should
be left open for 48 or 72 hours is often unclear. The 72 hours is
required if it is a weekend. If I open a pull request on a Friday
morning, does it need to stay open 48 hours or 72 or something in
between? Does it matter if I'm in one time zone or another?
The 48/72 rule predates our fast-tracking process. Given the ability to
fast-track trivial pull requests, there should be little disadvantage to
leaving significant changes open for 72 hours instead of 48 hours, and
arguably considerable advantage in terms of allowing people sufficient
time to review things.
So to simplify, standardize on 72 hours. Weekend or not, 72 hours. Easy.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/22275
Reviewed-By: John-David Dalton <john.david.dalton@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Сковорода Никита Андреевич <chalkerx@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Brian White <mscdex@mscdex.net>
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <me@jonathanmoss.me>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ben Coe <bencoe@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: João Reis <reis@janeasystems.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
https://github.com/nodejs/node-eps has been archived and new proposals
can no longer be opened there. Remove the corresponding recommendation
to use it.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/23148
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/TSC/issues/335
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
Update the Collaborator Guide to use the assert team for notifications
on assert module issues and pull requests.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/23085
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <vsemozhetbyt@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Currently, changes require approval by one Collaborator in most cases.
However there are situations where two approvals are required. For
example, breaking changes require two approvals from TSC members. And
fast-tracking a request requires two approvals.
Additionally, although only one approval is strictly required, in
practice, we nearly always seek a second approval when there is only
one.
Lastly, concerns have been raised about (perhaps unintentionally) gaming
the one-approval system by suggesting a change to someone else, and then
approving that change when the user submits a pull request. This
resolves (or at least mitigates) that concern.
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/19564
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/22255
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/19564
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Сковорода Никита Андреевич <chalkerx@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matheus Marchini <mat@mmarchini.me>
Reviewed-By: Bryan English <bryan@bryanenglish.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: John-David Dalton <john.david.dalton@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <me@jonathanmoss.me>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ujjwal Sharma <usharma1998@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Roman Reiss <me@silverwind.io>
Reviewed-By: George Adams <george.adams@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <apapirovski@mac.com>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <myles.borins@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Currently the documentation is not specific how fast-tracking should
be applied. This specifies exactly how things should be done to prevent
confusion.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/22929
Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <shishugi@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <vsemozhetbyt@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: John-David Dalton <john.david.dalton@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Weijia Wang <starkwang@126.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Matheus Marchini <mat@mmarchini.me>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Yuta Hiroto <hello@hiroppy.me>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: George Adams <george.adams@uk.ibm.com>
Add reference to guide with requirements/principles
for accepting additions to N-API.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/22593
Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <vsemozhetbyt@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
`node-test-pull-request-lite` CI job is deprecated now and
https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request-lite/ has this note:
"DEPRECATED: please use the node-test-pull-request-lite-pipeline job".
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/21938
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <me@jonathanmoss.me>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: João Reis <reis@janeasystems.com>
Make the text about CI runs in the COLLABORATOR_GUIDE more concise. Add
information about Resume Build which should generally be preferred over
Rebuild.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/21645
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <vsemozhetbyt@gmail.com>
Instead of wording the paragraph about communicating deprecations with
the ecosystem as if it were directed at the ecosystem, write it as in
imperative directed at the collaborator, since that is the audience for
the COLLABORATOR_GUIDE. Instead of assuring the reader that a best
effort will be made, instruct the reader to make the effort to
communicate with the ecosystem.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/21340
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <vsemozhetbyt@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
The Deprecation cycle explanation in the COLLABORATOR_GUIDE.md file is
now more concise.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/21303
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <minwoo@nodesource.com>
Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <apapirovski@mac.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Provide more concise explanations of the deprecation levels in
COLLABORATOR_GUIDE.md.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/21241
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Yuta Hiroto <hello@hiroppy.me>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Tiancheng "Timothy" Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ujjwal Sharma <usharma1998@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Weijia Wang <starkwang@126.com>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
* Use definition from Wikipedia. Provide link.
* Use italics for "words-as-words".
* Simplify sentence. ("Deprecation is..." rather than "Deprecation
refers to...".)
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/20788
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
The references in the COLLABORATOR_GUIDE appear to be in no particular
order. Sort in ASCII order.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/20790
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <vsemozhetbyt@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Some of the mentioned files seem to be moved or renamed.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/20564
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ujjwal Sharma <usharma1998@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Explicitely mention that a documentation only deprecation does not
always imply that it will be staged for deprecation in a future
Node.js major release. It is mainly there to tell developers that
a specific API should be avoided.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/20381
Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <vsemozhetbyt@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tiancheng "Timothy" Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Remove unnecessary "has been known to" tentativeness from
COLLABORATOR_GUIDE.md. "has been known to" is an awkward replacement for
"can" or "might" or "sometimes does" or "does". Pick the right one and
use it.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/20412
Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <vsemozhetbyt@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Put the "who to cc" information in the COLLABORATOR_GUIDE. The
onboarding-extras doc is a bit of miscellaneous collection. Rather than
stashing things in a junk drawer doc, put them where they are relevant.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/19460
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <apapirovski@mac.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/19458
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <me@jonathanmoss.me>
Remove bulleted list formatting. Only check email/name for new
contributors. Change `full name` to `name` and remove italics to avoid
incorrect implication that we need a "legal name".
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/19458
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <me@jonathanmoss.me>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/19458
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <me@jonathanmoss.me>
This also updates some parts of the onboarding. It is mainly about
how to handle pull requests, how and when to start a CI, when to add
the `ready` label and some other minor changes.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/19116
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <minwoo@nodesource.com>
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host>
Reviewed-By: Chen Gang <gangc.cxy@foxmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <vsemozhetbyt@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Glen Keane <glenkeane.94@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
- Suggest to use a TOTP app if the new collaborator cannot receive
SMS messages from GitHub
- Suggest to install node-core-utils and set up credentials before
the onboarding session.
- Ask about subsystem teams that they want to join
- Note about squashing commits
- Other small fixes
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/19108
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
It makes more sense to provide instructions on how to update the PR
branch before instructions on pushing the commit.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/18355
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <me@jonathanmoss.me>
This is described as being a doc-only deprecation subset.
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/18417
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/18433
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Current alt text results in "GitHub badge badge". Change to intended use
of alt text so that it reads "GitHub First-time contributor badge". (The
alt text is supposed to replace the image in the event that the image
cannot be rendered.)
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/17922
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tiancheng "Timothy" Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <vsemozhetbyt@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <me@jonathanmoss.me>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
