mirror of
https://github.com/nodejs/node.git
synced 2024-11-30 07:27:22 +01:00
http: Don't hot-path end() for large buffers
The benefits of the hot-path optimization below start to fall off when the buffer size gets up near 128KB, because the cost of the copy is more than the cost of the extra write() call. Switch to the write/end method at that point. Heuristics and magic numbers are awful, but slow http responses are worse. Fix #4975
This commit is contained in:
parent
ca5022b8f1
commit
d62cf59dc1
59
benchmark/http/end-vs-write-end.js
Normal file
59
benchmark/http/end-vs-write-end.js
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
|
||||
// When calling .end(buffer) right away, this triggers a "hot path"
|
||||
// optimization in http.js, to avoid an extra write call.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// However, the overhead of copying a large buffer is higher than
|
||||
// the overhead of an extra write() call, so the hot path was not
|
||||
// always as hot as it could be.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Verify that our assumptions are valid.
|
||||
|
||||
var common = require('../common.js');
|
||||
var PORT = common.PORT;
|
||||
|
||||
var bench = common.createBenchmark(main, {
|
||||
type: ['asc', 'utf', 'buf'],
|
||||
kb: [64, 128, 256, 1024],
|
||||
c: [100],
|
||||
method: ['write', 'end '] // two spaces added to line up each row
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
function main(conf) {
|
||||
http = require('http');
|
||||
var chunk;
|
||||
var len = conf.kb * 1024;
|
||||
switch (conf.type) {
|
||||
case 'buf':
|
||||
chunk = new Buffer(len);
|
||||
chunk.fill('x');
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case 'utf':
|
||||
encoding = 'utf8';
|
||||
chunk = new Array(len / 2 + 1).join('ü');
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case 'asc':
|
||||
chunk = new Array(len + 1).join('a');
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function write(res) {
|
||||
res.write(chunk);
|
||||
res.end();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function end(res) {
|
||||
res.end(chunk);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
var method = conf.method === 'write' ? write : end;
|
||||
var args = ['-r', 5000, '-t', 8, '-c', conf.c];
|
||||
|
||||
var server = http.createServer(function(req, res) {
|
||||
method(res);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
server.listen(common.PORT, function() {
|
||||
bench.http('/', args, function() {
|
||||
server.close();
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
@ -855,6 +855,14 @@ OutgoingMessage.prototype.end = function(data, encoding) {
|
||||
this.connection.writable &&
|
||||
this.connection._httpMessage === this;
|
||||
|
||||
// The benefits of the hot-path optimization below start to fall
|
||||
// off when the buffer size gets up near 128KB, because the cost
|
||||
// of the copy is more than the cost of the extra write() call.
|
||||
// Switch to the write/end method at that point. Heuristics and
|
||||
// magic numbers are awful, but slow http responses are worse.
|
||||
if (hot && Buffer.isBuffer(data) && data.length > 120 * 1024)
|
||||
hot = false;
|
||||
|
||||
if (hot) {
|
||||
// Hot path. They're doing
|
||||
// res.writeHead();
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user