mirror of
https://github.com/nodejs/node.git
synced 2024-12-01 16:10:02 +01:00
doc: add TC notes from october 29th
PR-URL: https://github.com/node-forward/node/pull/41 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> @rvagg: cherry-picked2c7847b
ande7dec60
from master to v0.12
This commit is contained in:
parent
26b11d5a14
commit
99e7c584f4
33
doc/tc-meetings/2014-10-29.md
Normal file
33
doc/tc-meetings/2014-10-29.md
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
|
||||
* Update on Build
|
||||
* @rvagg is working on getting the builds consistently green
|
||||
before moving on to more complicated things.
|
||||
* @issacs brought up the Joyent Advisory board
|
||||
* Some confusion out there about Node Forward vs. Advisory Board
|
||||
* @mikeal updated the messaging on the website to be clearer
|
||||
* The website has clearer calls to action for the community
|
||||
* Libuv move
|
||||
* The libuv contributors want to move to the libuv org.
|
||||
* @mikeal will email @indutny and other libuv contributors to ask them
|
||||
to log an issue about this on their repo for transparency and so that
|
||||
this is not a surprise to Joyent
|
||||
* Update on "release buckets"
|
||||
* doesn't make sense while we're private, we'll wait until it is public again
|
||||
* `node-forward/node` going public
|
||||
* when we made the repo private it was messaged as only being for "four weeks"
|
||||
* "four weeks" is up on November 8th
|
||||
* someone on the Advisory Board needs to remind Joyent of this in the
|
||||
next advisory board meeting so they aren't suprised by it even though
|
||||
it was communicated to them when it was first made public.
|
||||
* @mikeal will work on the messaging in the README to make it clear this is
|
||||
a "soft" fork and not a "hard" fork.
|
||||
* ramifications of going public will be discussed in next week's TC meeting as
|
||||
well
|
||||
* @mikeal proposed a change in TC meeting process
|
||||
* it's impossible to schedule all the timezones involved in every meeting
|
||||
* every Monday create a "Weekly TC Agenda" Issue people can contribute to
|
||||
* the TC members who care about that Agenda will state they want to be in the
|
||||
meeting
|
||||
* @mikeal will work to schedule the TC members who care for a hangout
|
||||
* people are using and liking gitter
|
||||
* we'll consider moving from IRC to gitter once the repo is public again
|
||||
* yes, gitter has IRC integration (you can login to gitter from an IRC client)
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user