0
0
mirror of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea.git synced 2024-11-25 08:11:19 +01:00
gitea/modules/indexer/code/indexer_test.go

339 lines
8.4 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

// Copyright 2020 The Gitea Authors. All rights reserved.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
package code
import (
"context"
Refactor indexer (#25174) Refactor `modules/indexer` to make it more maintainable. And it can be easier to support more features. I'm trying to solve some of issue searching, this is a precursor to making functional changes. Current supported engines and the index versions: | engines | issues | code | | - | - | - | | db | Just a wrapper for database queries, doesn't need version | - | | bleve | The version of index is **2** | The version of index is **6** | | elasticsearch | The old index has no version, will be treated as version **0** in this PR | The version of index is **1** | | meilisearch | The old index has no version, will be treated as version **0** in this PR | - | ## Changes ### Split Splited it into mutiple packages ```text indexer ├── internal │   ├── bleve │   ├── db │   ├── elasticsearch │   └── meilisearch ├── code │   ├── bleve │   ├── elasticsearch │   └── internal └── issues ├── bleve ├── db ├── elasticsearch ├── internal └── meilisearch ``` - `indexer/interanal`: Internal shared package for indexer. - `indexer/interanal/[engine]`: Internal shared package for each engine (bleve/db/elasticsearch/meilisearch). - `indexer/code`: Implementations for code indexer. - `indexer/code/internal`: Internal shared package for code indexer. - `indexer/code/[engine]`: Implementation via each engine for code indexer. - `indexer/issues`: Implementations for issues indexer. ### Deduplication - Combine `Init/Ping/Close` for code indexer and issues indexer. - ~Combine `issues.indexerHolder` and `code.wrappedIndexer` to `internal.IndexHolder`.~ Remove it, use dummy indexer instead when the indexer is not ready. - Duplicate two copies of creating ES clients. - Duplicate two copies of `indexerID()`. ### Enhancement - [x] Support index version for elasticsearch issues indexer, the old index without version will be treated as version 0. - [x] Fix spell of `elastic_search/ElasticSearch`, it should be `Elasticsearch`. - [x] Improve versioning of ES index. We don't need `Aliases`: - Gitea does't need aliases for "Zero Downtime" because it never delete old indexes. - The old code of issues indexer uses the orignal name to create issue index, so it's tricky to convert it to an alias. - [x] Support index version for meilisearch issues indexer, the old index without version will be treated as version 0. - [x] Do "ping" only when `Ping` has been called, don't ping periodically and cache the status. - [x] Support the context parameter whenever possible. - [x] Fix outdated example config. - [x] Give up the requeue logic of issues indexer: When indexing fails, call Ping to check if it was caused by the engine being unavailable, and only requeue the task if the engine is unavailable. - It is fragile and tricky, could cause data losing (It did happen when I was doing some tests for this PR). And it works for ES only. - Just always requeue the failed task, if it caused by bad data, it's a bug of Gitea which should be fixed. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-06-23 14:37:56 +02:00
"os"
Allow code search by filename (#32210) This is a large and complex PR, so let me explain in detail its changes. First, I had to create new index mappings for Bleve and ElasticSerach as the current ones do not support search by filename. This requires Gitea to recreate the code search indexes (I do not know if this is a breaking change, but I feel it deserves a heads-up). I've used [this approach](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/7.17/analysis-pathhierarchy-tokenizer.html) to model the filename index. It allows us to efficiently search for both the full path and the name of a file. Bleve, however, does not support this out-of-box, so I had to code a brand new [token filter](https://blevesearch.com/docs/Token-Filters/) to generate the search terms. I also did an overhaul in the `indexer_test.go` file. It now asserts the order of the expected results (this is important since matches based on the name of a file are more relevant than those based on its content). I've added new test scenarios that deal with searching by filename. They use a new repo included in the Gitea fixture. The screenshot below depicts how Gitea shows the search results. It shows results based on content in the same way as the current version does. In matches based on the filename, the first seven lines of the file contents are shown (BTW, this is how GitHub does it). ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9d938d86-1a8d-4f89-8644-1921a473e858) Resolves #32096 --------- Signed-off-by: Bruno Sofiato <bruno.sofiato@gmail.com>
2024-10-12 01:35:04 +02:00
"slices"
"testing"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/db"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/unittest"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/git"
Refactor indexer (#25174) Refactor `modules/indexer` to make it more maintainable. And it can be easier to support more features. I'm trying to solve some of issue searching, this is a precursor to making functional changes. Current supported engines and the index versions: | engines | issues | code | | - | - | - | | db | Just a wrapper for database queries, doesn't need version | - | | bleve | The version of index is **2** | The version of index is **6** | | elasticsearch | The old index has no version, will be treated as version **0** in this PR | The version of index is **1** | | meilisearch | The old index has no version, will be treated as version **0** in this PR | - | ## Changes ### Split Splited it into mutiple packages ```text indexer ├── internal │   ├── bleve │   ├── db │   ├── elasticsearch │   └── meilisearch ├── code │   ├── bleve │   ├── elasticsearch │   └── internal └── issues ├── bleve ├── db ├── elasticsearch ├── internal └── meilisearch ``` - `indexer/interanal`: Internal shared package for indexer. - `indexer/interanal/[engine]`: Internal shared package for each engine (bleve/db/elasticsearch/meilisearch). - `indexer/code`: Implementations for code indexer. - `indexer/code/internal`: Internal shared package for code indexer. - `indexer/code/[engine]`: Implementation via each engine for code indexer. - `indexer/issues`: Implementations for issues indexer. ### Deduplication - Combine `Init/Ping/Close` for code indexer and issues indexer. - ~Combine `issues.indexerHolder` and `code.wrappedIndexer` to `internal.IndexHolder`.~ Remove it, use dummy indexer instead when the indexer is not ready. - Duplicate two copies of creating ES clients. - Duplicate two copies of `indexerID()`. ### Enhancement - [x] Support index version for elasticsearch issues indexer, the old index without version will be treated as version 0. - [x] Fix spell of `elastic_search/ElasticSearch`, it should be `Elasticsearch`. - [x] Improve versioning of ES index. We don't need `Aliases`: - Gitea does't need aliases for "Zero Downtime" because it never delete old indexes. - The old code of issues indexer uses the orignal name to create issue index, so it's tricky to convert it to an alias. - [x] Support index version for meilisearch issues indexer, the old index without version will be treated as version 0. - [x] Do "ping" only when `Ping` has been called, don't ping periodically and cache the status. - [x] Support the context parameter whenever possible. - [x] Fix outdated example config. - [x] Give up the requeue logic of issues indexer: When indexing fails, call Ping to check if it was caused by the engine being unavailable, and only requeue the task if the engine is unavailable. - It is fragile and tricky, could cause data losing (It did happen when I was doing some tests for this PR). And it works for ES only. - Just always requeue the failed task, if it caused by bad data, it's a bug of Gitea which should be fixed. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-06-23 14:37:56 +02:00
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/indexer/code/bleve"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/indexer/code/elasticsearch"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/indexer/code/internal"
_ "code.gitea.io/gitea/models"
_ "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/actions"
_ "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/activities"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
Allow code search by filename (#32210) This is a large and complex PR, so let me explain in detail its changes. First, I had to create new index mappings for Bleve and ElasticSerach as the current ones do not support search by filename. This requires Gitea to recreate the code search indexes (I do not know if this is a breaking change, but I feel it deserves a heads-up). I've used [this approach](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/7.17/analysis-pathhierarchy-tokenizer.html) to model the filename index. It allows us to efficiently search for both the full path and the name of a file. Bleve, however, does not support this out-of-box, so I had to code a brand new [token filter](https://blevesearch.com/docs/Token-Filters/) to generate the search terms. I also did an overhaul in the `indexer_test.go` file. It now asserts the order of the expected results (this is important since matches based on the name of a file are more relevant than those based on its content). I've added new test scenarios that deal with searching by filename. They use a new repo included in the Gitea fixture. The screenshot below depicts how Gitea shows the search results. It shows results based on content in the same way as the current version does. In matches based on the filename, the first seven lines of the file contents are shown (BTW, this is how GitHub does it). ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9d938d86-1a8d-4f89-8644-1921a473e858) Resolves #32096 --------- Signed-off-by: Bruno Sofiato <bruno.sofiato@gmail.com>
2024-10-12 01:35:04 +02:00
_ "github.com/mattn/go-sqlite3"
)
Allow code search by filename (#32210) This is a large and complex PR, so let me explain in detail its changes. First, I had to create new index mappings for Bleve and ElasticSerach as the current ones do not support search by filename. This requires Gitea to recreate the code search indexes (I do not know if this is a breaking change, but I feel it deserves a heads-up). I've used [this approach](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/7.17/analysis-pathhierarchy-tokenizer.html) to model the filename index. It allows us to efficiently search for both the full path and the name of a file. Bleve, however, does not support this out-of-box, so I had to code a brand new [token filter](https://blevesearch.com/docs/Token-Filters/) to generate the search terms. I also did an overhaul in the `indexer_test.go` file. It now asserts the order of the expected results (this is important since matches based on the name of a file are more relevant than those based on its content). I've added new test scenarios that deal with searching by filename. They use a new repo included in the Gitea fixture. The screenshot below depicts how Gitea shows the search results. It shows results based on content in the same way as the current version does. In matches based on the filename, the first seven lines of the file contents are shown (BTW, this is how GitHub does it). ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9d938d86-1a8d-4f89-8644-1921a473e858) Resolves #32096 --------- Signed-off-by: Bruno Sofiato <bruno.sofiato@gmail.com>
2024-10-12 01:35:04 +02:00
type codeSearchResult struct {
Filename string
Content string
}
func TestMain(m *testing.M) {
unittest.MainTest(m)
}
Refactor indexer (#25174) Refactor `modules/indexer` to make it more maintainable. And it can be easier to support more features. I'm trying to solve some of issue searching, this is a precursor to making functional changes. Current supported engines and the index versions: | engines | issues | code | | - | - | - | | db | Just a wrapper for database queries, doesn't need version | - | | bleve | The version of index is **2** | The version of index is **6** | | elasticsearch | The old index has no version, will be treated as version **0** in this PR | The version of index is **1** | | meilisearch | The old index has no version, will be treated as version **0** in this PR | - | ## Changes ### Split Splited it into mutiple packages ```text indexer ├── internal │   ├── bleve │   ├── db │   ├── elasticsearch │   └── meilisearch ├── code │   ├── bleve │   ├── elasticsearch │   └── internal └── issues ├── bleve ├── db ├── elasticsearch ├── internal └── meilisearch ``` - `indexer/interanal`: Internal shared package for indexer. - `indexer/interanal/[engine]`: Internal shared package for each engine (bleve/db/elasticsearch/meilisearch). - `indexer/code`: Implementations for code indexer. - `indexer/code/internal`: Internal shared package for code indexer. - `indexer/code/[engine]`: Implementation via each engine for code indexer. - `indexer/issues`: Implementations for issues indexer. ### Deduplication - Combine `Init/Ping/Close` for code indexer and issues indexer. - ~Combine `issues.indexerHolder` and `code.wrappedIndexer` to `internal.IndexHolder`.~ Remove it, use dummy indexer instead when the indexer is not ready. - Duplicate two copies of creating ES clients. - Duplicate two copies of `indexerID()`. ### Enhancement - [x] Support index version for elasticsearch issues indexer, the old index without version will be treated as version 0. - [x] Fix spell of `elastic_search/ElasticSearch`, it should be `Elasticsearch`. - [x] Improve versioning of ES index. We don't need `Aliases`: - Gitea does't need aliases for "Zero Downtime" because it never delete old indexes. - The old code of issues indexer uses the orignal name to create issue index, so it's tricky to convert it to an alias. - [x] Support index version for meilisearch issues indexer, the old index without version will be treated as version 0. - [x] Do "ping" only when `Ping` has been called, don't ping periodically and cache the status. - [x] Support the context parameter whenever possible. - [x] Fix outdated example config. - [x] Give up the requeue logic of issues indexer: When indexing fails, call Ping to check if it was caused by the engine being unavailable, and only requeue the task if the engine is unavailable. - It is fragile and tricky, could cause data losing (It did happen when I was doing some tests for this PR). And it works for ES only. - Just always requeue the failed task, if it caused by bad data, it's a bug of Gitea which should be fixed. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-06-23 14:37:56 +02:00
func testIndexer(name string, t *testing.T, indexer internal.Indexer) {
t.Run(name, func(t *testing.T) {
Allow code search by filename (#32210) This is a large and complex PR, so let me explain in detail its changes. First, I had to create new index mappings for Bleve and ElasticSerach as the current ones do not support search by filename. This requires Gitea to recreate the code search indexes (I do not know if this is a breaking change, but I feel it deserves a heads-up). I've used [this approach](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/7.17/analysis-pathhierarchy-tokenizer.html) to model the filename index. It allows us to efficiently search for both the full path and the name of a file. Bleve, however, does not support this out-of-box, so I had to code a brand new [token filter](https://blevesearch.com/docs/Token-Filters/) to generate the search terms. I also did an overhaul in the `indexer_test.go` file. It now asserts the order of the expected results (this is important since matches based on the name of a file are more relevant than those based on its content). I've added new test scenarios that deal with searching by filename. They use a new repo included in the Gitea fixture. The screenshot below depicts how Gitea shows the search results. It shows results based on content in the same way as the current version does. In matches based on the filename, the first seven lines of the file contents are shown (BTW, this is how GitHub does it). ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9d938d86-1a8d-4f89-8644-1921a473e858) Resolves #32096 --------- Signed-off-by: Bruno Sofiato <bruno.sofiato@gmail.com>
2024-10-12 01:35:04 +02:00
assert.NoError(t, setupRepositoryIndexes(git.DefaultContext, indexer))
keywords := []struct {
RepoIDs []int64
Keyword string
Langs int
Allow code search by filename (#32210) This is a large and complex PR, so let me explain in detail its changes. First, I had to create new index mappings for Bleve and ElasticSerach as the current ones do not support search by filename. This requires Gitea to recreate the code search indexes (I do not know if this is a breaking change, but I feel it deserves a heads-up). I've used [this approach](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/7.17/analysis-pathhierarchy-tokenizer.html) to model the filename index. It allows us to efficiently search for both the full path and the name of a file. Bleve, however, does not support this out-of-box, so I had to code a brand new [token filter](https://blevesearch.com/docs/Token-Filters/) to generate the search terms. I also did an overhaul in the `indexer_test.go` file. It now asserts the order of the expected results (this is important since matches based on the name of a file are more relevant than those based on its content). I've added new test scenarios that deal with searching by filename. They use a new repo included in the Gitea fixture. The screenshot below depicts how Gitea shows the search results. It shows results based on content in the same way as the current version does. In matches based on the filename, the first seven lines of the file contents are shown (BTW, this is how GitHub does it). ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9d938d86-1a8d-4f89-8644-1921a473e858) Resolves #32096 --------- Signed-off-by: Bruno Sofiato <bruno.sofiato@gmail.com>
2024-10-12 01:35:04 +02:00
Results []codeSearchResult
}{
Allow code search by filename (#32210) This is a large and complex PR, so let me explain in detail its changes. First, I had to create new index mappings for Bleve and ElasticSerach as the current ones do not support search by filename. This requires Gitea to recreate the code search indexes (I do not know if this is a breaking change, but I feel it deserves a heads-up). I've used [this approach](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/7.17/analysis-pathhierarchy-tokenizer.html) to model the filename index. It allows us to efficiently search for both the full path and the name of a file. Bleve, however, does not support this out-of-box, so I had to code a brand new [token filter](https://blevesearch.com/docs/Token-Filters/) to generate the search terms. I also did an overhaul in the `indexer_test.go` file. It now asserts the order of the expected results (this is important since matches based on the name of a file are more relevant than those based on its content). I've added new test scenarios that deal with searching by filename. They use a new repo included in the Gitea fixture. The screenshot below depicts how Gitea shows the search results. It shows results based on content in the same way as the current version does. In matches based on the filename, the first seven lines of the file contents are shown (BTW, this is how GitHub does it). ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9d938d86-1a8d-4f89-8644-1921a473e858) Resolves #32096 --------- Signed-off-by: Bruno Sofiato <bruno.sofiato@gmail.com>
2024-10-12 01:35:04 +02:00
// Search for an exact match on the contents of a file
// This scenario yields a single result (the file README.md on the repo '1')
{
RepoIDs: nil,
Keyword: "Description",
Langs: 1,
Allow code search by filename (#32210) This is a large and complex PR, so let me explain in detail its changes. First, I had to create new index mappings for Bleve and ElasticSerach as the current ones do not support search by filename. This requires Gitea to recreate the code search indexes (I do not know if this is a breaking change, but I feel it deserves a heads-up). I've used [this approach](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/7.17/analysis-pathhierarchy-tokenizer.html) to model the filename index. It allows us to efficiently search for both the full path and the name of a file. Bleve, however, does not support this out-of-box, so I had to code a brand new [token filter](https://blevesearch.com/docs/Token-Filters/) to generate the search terms. I also did an overhaul in the `indexer_test.go` file. It now asserts the order of the expected results (this is important since matches based on the name of a file are more relevant than those based on its content). I've added new test scenarios that deal with searching by filename. They use a new repo included in the Gitea fixture. The screenshot below depicts how Gitea shows the search results. It shows results based on content in the same way as the current version does. In matches based on the filename, the first seven lines of the file contents are shown (BTW, this is how GitHub does it). ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9d938d86-1a8d-4f89-8644-1921a473e858) Resolves #32096 --------- Signed-off-by: Bruno Sofiato <bruno.sofiato@gmail.com>
2024-10-12 01:35:04 +02:00
Results: []codeSearchResult{
{
Filename: "README.md",
Content: "# repo1\n\nDescription for repo1",
},
},
},
Allow code search by filename (#32210) This is a large and complex PR, so let me explain in detail its changes. First, I had to create new index mappings for Bleve and ElasticSerach as the current ones do not support search by filename. This requires Gitea to recreate the code search indexes (I do not know if this is a breaking change, but I feel it deserves a heads-up). I've used [this approach](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/7.17/analysis-pathhierarchy-tokenizer.html) to model the filename index. It allows us to efficiently search for both the full path and the name of a file. Bleve, however, does not support this out-of-box, so I had to code a brand new [token filter](https://blevesearch.com/docs/Token-Filters/) to generate the search terms. I also did an overhaul in the `indexer_test.go` file. It now asserts the order of the expected results (this is important since matches based on the name of a file are more relevant than those based on its content). I've added new test scenarios that deal with searching by filename. They use a new repo included in the Gitea fixture. The screenshot below depicts how Gitea shows the search results. It shows results based on content in the same way as the current version does. In matches based on the filename, the first seven lines of the file contents are shown (BTW, this is how GitHub does it). ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9d938d86-1a8d-4f89-8644-1921a473e858) Resolves #32096 --------- Signed-off-by: Bruno Sofiato <bruno.sofiato@gmail.com>
2024-10-12 01:35:04 +02:00
// Search for an exact match on the contents of a file within the repo '2'.
// This scenario yields no results
{
RepoIDs: []int64{2},
Keyword: "Description",
Langs: 0,
},
Allow code search by filename (#32210) This is a large and complex PR, so let me explain in detail its changes. First, I had to create new index mappings for Bleve and ElasticSerach as the current ones do not support search by filename. This requires Gitea to recreate the code search indexes (I do not know if this is a breaking change, but I feel it deserves a heads-up). I've used [this approach](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/7.17/analysis-pathhierarchy-tokenizer.html) to model the filename index. It allows us to efficiently search for both the full path and the name of a file. Bleve, however, does not support this out-of-box, so I had to code a brand new [token filter](https://blevesearch.com/docs/Token-Filters/) to generate the search terms. I also did an overhaul in the `indexer_test.go` file. It now asserts the order of the expected results (this is important since matches based on the name of a file are more relevant than those based on its content). I've added new test scenarios that deal with searching by filename. They use a new repo included in the Gitea fixture. The screenshot below depicts how Gitea shows the search results. It shows results based on content in the same way as the current version does. In matches based on the filename, the first seven lines of the file contents are shown (BTW, this is how GitHub does it). ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9d938d86-1a8d-4f89-8644-1921a473e858) Resolves #32096 --------- Signed-off-by: Bruno Sofiato <bruno.sofiato@gmail.com>
2024-10-12 01:35:04 +02:00
// Search for an exact match on the contents of a file
// This scenario yields a single result (the file README.md on the repo '1')
{
RepoIDs: nil,
Keyword: "repo1",
Langs: 1,
Allow code search by filename (#32210) This is a large and complex PR, so let me explain in detail its changes. First, I had to create new index mappings for Bleve and ElasticSerach as the current ones do not support search by filename. This requires Gitea to recreate the code search indexes (I do not know if this is a breaking change, but I feel it deserves a heads-up). I've used [this approach](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/7.17/analysis-pathhierarchy-tokenizer.html) to model the filename index. It allows us to efficiently search for both the full path and the name of a file. Bleve, however, does not support this out-of-box, so I had to code a brand new [token filter](https://blevesearch.com/docs/Token-Filters/) to generate the search terms. I also did an overhaul in the `indexer_test.go` file. It now asserts the order of the expected results (this is important since matches based on the name of a file are more relevant than those based on its content). I've added new test scenarios that deal with searching by filename. They use a new repo included in the Gitea fixture. The screenshot below depicts how Gitea shows the search results. It shows results based on content in the same way as the current version does. In matches based on the filename, the first seven lines of the file contents are shown (BTW, this is how GitHub does it). ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9d938d86-1a8d-4f89-8644-1921a473e858) Resolves #32096 --------- Signed-off-by: Bruno Sofiato <bruno.sofiato@gmail.com>
2024-10-12 01:35:04 +02:00
Results: []codeSearchResult{
{
Filename: "README.md",
Content: "# repo1\n\nDescription for repo1",
},
},
},
Allow code search by filename (#32210) This is a large and complex PR, so let me explain in detail its changes. First, I had to create new index mappings for Bleve and ElasticSerach as the current ones do not support search by filename. This requires Gitea to recreate the code search indexes (I do not know if this is a breaking change, but I feel it deserves a heads-up). I've used [this approach](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/7.17/analysis-pathhierarchy-tokenizer.html) to model the filename index. It allows us to efficiently search for both the full path and the name of a file. Bleve, however, does not support this out-of-box, so I had to code a brand new [token filter](https://blevesearch.com/docs/Token-Filters/) to generate the search terms. I also did an overhaul in the `indexer_test.go` file. It now asserts the order of the expected results (this is important since matches based on the name of a file are more relevant than those based on its content). I've added new test scenarios that deal with searching by filename. They use a new repo included in the Gitea fixture. The screenshot below depicts how Gitea shows the search results. It shows results based on content in the same way as the current version does. In matches based on the filename, the first seven lines of the file contents are shown (BTW, this is how GitHub does it). ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9d938d86-1a8d-4f89-8644-1921a473e858) Resolves #32096 --------- Signed-off-by: Bruno Sofiato <bruno.sofiato@gmail.com>
2024-10-12 01:35:04 +02:00
// Search for an exact match on the contents of a file within the repo '2'.
// This scenario yields no results
{
RepoIDs: []int64{2},
Keyword: "repo1",
Langs: 0,
},
Allow code search by filename (#32210) This is a large and complex PR, so let me explain in detail its changes. First, I had to create new index mappings for Bleve and ElasticSerach as the current ones do not support search by filename. This requires Gitea to recreate the code search indexes (I do not know if this is a breaking change, but I feel it deserves a heads-up). I've used [this approach](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/7.17/analysis-pathhierarchy-tokenizer.html) to model the filename index. It allows us to efficiently search for both the full path and the name of a file. Bleve, however, does not support this out-of-box, so I had to code a brand new [token filter](https://blevesearch.com/docs/Token-Filters/) to generate the search terms. I also did an overhaul in the `indexer_test.go` file. It now asserts the order of the expected results (this is important since matches based on the name of a file are more relevant than those based on its content). I've added new test scenarios that deal with searching by filename. They use a new repo included in the Gitea fixture. The screenshot below depicts how Gitea shows the search results. It shows results based on content in the same way as the current version does. In matches based on the filename, the first seven lines of the file contents are shown (BTW, this is how GitHub does it). ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9d938d86-1a8d-4f89-8644-1921a473e858) Resolves #32096 --------- Signed-off-by: Bruno Sofiato <bruno.sofiato@gmail.com>
2024-10-12 01:35:04 +02:00
// Search for a non-existing term.
// This scenario yields no results
{
RepoIDs: nil,
Keyword: "non-exist",
Langs: 0,
},
Allow code search by filename (#32210) This is a large and complex PR, so let me explain in detail its changes. First, I had to create new index mappings for Bleve and ElasticSerach as the current ones do not support search by filename. This requires Gitea to recreate the code search indexes (I do not know if this is a breaking change, but I feel it deserves a heads-up). I've used [this approach](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/7.17/analysis-pathhierarchy-tokenizer.html) to model the filename index. It allows us to efficiently search for both the full path and the name of a file. Bleve, however, does not support this out-of-box, so I had to code a brand new [token filter](https://blevesearch.com/docs/Token-Filters/) to generate the search terms. I also did an overhaul in the `indexer_test.go` file. It now asserts the order of the expected results (this is important since matches based on the name of a file are more relevant than those based on its content). I've added new test scenarios that deal with searching by filename. They use a new repo included in the Gitea fixture. The screenshot below depicts how Gitea shows the search results. It shows results based on content in the same way as the current version does. In matches based on the filename, the first seven lines of the file contents are shown (BTW, this is how GitHub does it). ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9d938d86-1a8d-4f89-8644-1921a473e858) Resolves #32096 --------- Signed-off-by: Bruno Sofiato <bruno.sofiato@gmail.com>
2024-10-12 01:35:04 +02:00
// Search for an exact match on the contents of a file within the repo '62'.
// This scenario yields a single result (the file avocado.md on the repo '62')
{
RepoIDs: []int64{62},
Keyword: "pineaple",
Langs: 1,
Results: []codeSearchResult{
{
Filename: "avocado.md",
Content: "# repo1\n\npineaple pie of cucumber juice",
},
},
},
// Search for an exact match on the filename within the repo '62'.
// This scenario yields a single result (the file avocado.md on the repo '62')
{
RepoIDs: []int64{62},
Keyword: "avocado.md",
Langs: 1,
Results: []codeSearchResult{
{
Filename: "avocado.md",
Content: "# repo1\n\npineaple pie of cucumber juice",
},
},
},
// Search for an partial match on the filename within the repo '62'.
// This scenario yields a single result (the file avocado.md on the repo '62')
{
RepoIDs: []int64{62},
Keyword: "avo",
Langs: 1,
Results: []codeSearchResult{
{
Filename: "avocado.md",
Content: "# repo1\n\npineaple pie of cucumber juice",
},
},
},
// Search for matches on both the contents and the filenames within the repo '62'.
// This scenario yields two results: the first result is baed on the file (cucumber.md) while the second is based on the contents
{
RepoIDs: []int64{62},
Keyword: "cucumber",
Langs: 1,
Results: []codeSearchResult{
{
Filename: "cucumber.md",
Content: "Salad is good for your health",
},
{
Filename: "avocado.md",
Content: "# repo1\n\npineaple pie of cucumber juice",
},
},
},
// Search for matches on the filenames within the repo '62'.
// This scenario yields two results (both are based on filename, the first one is an exact match)
{
RepoIDs: []int64{62},
Keyword: "ham",
Langs: 1,
Results: []codeSearchResult{
{
Filename: "ham.md",
Content: "This is also not cheese",
},
{
Filename: "potato/ham.md",
Content: "This is not cheese",
},
},
},
// Search for matches on the contents of files within the repo '62'.
// This scenario yields two results (both are based on contents, the first one is an exact match where as the second is a 'fuzzy' one)
{
RepoIDs: []int64{62},
Keyword: "This is not cheese",
Langs: 1,
Results: []codeSearchResult{
{
Filename: "potato/ham.md",
Content: "This is not cheese",
},
{
Filename: "ham.md",
Content: "This is also not cheese",
},
},
},
// Search for matches on the contents of files regardless of case.
{
RepoIDs: nil,
Keyword: "dESCRIPTION",
Langs: 1,
Results: []codeSearchResult{
{
Filename: "README.md",
Content: "# repo1\n\nDescription for repo1",
},
},
},
// Search for an exact match on the filename within the repo '62' (case insenstive).
// This scenario yields a single result (the file avocado.md on the repo '62')
{
RepoIDs: []int64{62},
Keyword: "AVOCADO.MD",
Langs: 1,
Results: []codeSearchResult{
{
Filename: "avocado.md",
Content: "# repo1\n\npineaple pie of cucumber juice",
},
},
},
// Search for matches on the contents of files when the criteria is a expression.
{
RepoIDs: []int64{62},
Keyword: "console.log",
Langs: 1,
Results: []codeSearchResult{
{
Filename: "example-file.js",
Content: "console.log(\"Hello, World!\")",
},
},
},
// Search for matches on the contents of files when the criteria is part of a expression.
{
RepoIDs: []int64{62},
Keyword: "log",
Langs: 1,
Results: []codeSearchResult{
{
Filename: "example-file.js",
Content: "console.log(\"Hello, World!\")",
},
},
},
}
for _, kw := range keywords {
t.Run(kw.Keyword, func(t *testing.T) {
total, res, langs, err := indexer.Search(context.TODO(), &internal.SearchOptions{
RepoIDs: kw.RepoIDs,
Keyword: kw.Keyword,
Paginator: &db.ListOptions{
Page: 1,
PageSize: 10,
},
IsKeywordFuzzy: true,
})
assert.NoError(t, err)
2021-06-07 07:27:09 +02:00
assert.Len(t, langs, kw.Langs)
Allow code search by filename (#32210) This is a large and complex PR, so let me explain in detail its changes. First, I had to create new index mappings for Bleve and ElasticSerach as the current ones do not support search by filename. This requires Gitea to recreate the code search indexes (I do not know if this is a breaking change, but I feel it deserves a heads-up). I've used [this approach](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/7.17/analysis-pathhierarchy-tokenizer.html) to model the filename index. It allows us to efficiently search for both the full path and the name of a file. Bleve, however, does not support this out-of-box, so I had to code a brand new [token filter](https://blevesearch.com/docs/Token-Filters/) to generate the search terms. I also did an overhaul in the `indexer_test.go` file. It now asserts the order of the expected results (this is important since matches based on the name of a file are more relevant than those based on its content). I've added new test scenarios that deal with searching by filename. They use a new repo included in the Gitea fixture. The screenshot below depicts how Gitea shows the search results. It shows results based on content in the same way as the current version does. In matches based on the filename, the first seven lines of the file contents are shown (BTW, this is how GitHub does it). ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9d938d86-1a8d-4f89-8644-1921a473e858) Resolves #32096 --------- Signed-off-by: Bruno Sofiato <bruno.sofiato@gmail.com>
2024-10-12 01:35:04 +02:00
hits := make([]codeSearchResult, 0, len(res))
if total > 0 {
assert.NotEmpty(t, kw.Results, "The given scenario does not provide any expected results")
}
for _, hit := range res {
Allow code search by filename (#32210) This is a large and complex PR, so let me explain in detail its changes. First, I had to create new index mappings for Bleve and ElasticSerach as the current ones do not support search by filename. This requires Gitea to recreate the code search indexes (I do not know if this is a breaking change, but I feel it deserves a heads-up). I've used [this approach](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/7.17/analysis-pathhierarchy-tokenizer.html) to model the filename index. It allows us to efficiently search for both the full path and the name of a file. Bleve, however, does not support this out-of-box, so I had to code a brand new [token filter](https://blevesearch.com/docs/Token-Filters/) to generate the search terms. I also did an overhaul in the `indexer_test.go` file. It now asserts the order of the expected results (this is important since matches based on the name of a file are more relevant than those based on its content). I've added new test scenarios that deal with searching by filename. They use a new repo included in the Gitea fixture. The screenshot below depicts how Gitea shows the search results. It shows results based on content in the same way as the current version does. In matches based on the filename, the first seven lines of the file contents are shown (BTW, this is how GitHub does it). ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9d938d86-1a8d-4f89-8644-1921a473e858) Resolves #32096 --------- Signed-off-by: Bruno Sofiato <bruno.sofiato@gmail.com>
2024-10-12 01:35:04 +02:00
hits = append(hits, codeSearchResult{
Filename: hit.Filename,
Content: hit.Content,
})
}
lastIndex := -1
for _, expected := range kw.Results {
index := slices.Index(hits, expected)
if index == -1 {
assert.Failf(t, "Result not found", "Expected %v in %v", expected, hits)
} else if lastIndex > index {
assert.Failf(t, "Result is out of order", "The order of %v within %v is wrong", expected, hits)
} else {
lastIndex = index
}
}
})
}
Allow code search by filename (#32210) This is a large and complex PR, so let me explain in detail its changes. First, I had to create new index mappings for Bleve and ElasticSerach as the current ones do not support search by filename. This requires Gitea to recreate the code search indexes (I do not know if this is a breaking change, but I feel it deserves a heads-up). I've used [this approach](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/7.17/analysis-pathhierarchy-tokenizer.html) to model the filename index. It allows us to efficiently search for both the full path and the name of a file. Bleve, however, does not support this out-of-box, so I had to code a brand new [token filter](https://blevesearch.com/docs/Token-Filters/) to generate the search terms. I also did an overhaul in the `indexer_test.go` file. It now asserts the order of the expected results (this is important since matches based on the name of a file are more relevant than those based on its content). I've added new test scenarios that deal with searching by filename. They use a new repo included in the Gitea fixture. The screenshot below depicts how Gitea shows the search results. It shows results based on content in the same way as the current version does. In matches based on the filename, the first seven lines of the file contents are shown (BTW, this is how GitHub does it). ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9d938d86-1a8d-4f89-8644-1921a473e858) Resolves #32096 --------- Signed-off-by: Bruno Sofiato <bruno.sofiato@gmail.com>
2024-10-12 01:35:04 +02:00
assert.NoError(t, tearDownRepositoryIndexes(indexer))
})
}
Refactor indexer (#25174) Refactor `modules/indexer` to make it more maintainable. And it can be easier to support more features. I'm trying to solve some of issue searching, this is a precursor to making functional changes. Current supported engines and the index versions: | engines | issues | code | | - | - | - | | db | Just a wrapper for database queries, doesn't need version | - | | bleve | The version of index is **2** | The version of index is **6** | | elasticsearch | The old index has no version, will be treated as version **0** in this PR | The version of index is **1** | | meilisearch | The old index has no version, will be treated as version **0** in this PR | - | ## Changes ### Split Splited it into mutiple packages ```text indexer ├── internal │   ├── bleve │   ├── db │   ├── elasticsearch │   └── meilisearch ├── code │   ├── bleve │   ├── elasticsearch │   └── internal └── issues ├── bleve ├── db ├── elasticsearch ├── internal └── meilisearch ``` - `indexer/interanal`: Internal shared package for indexer. - `indexer/interanal/[engine]`: Internal shared package for each engine (bleve/db/elasticsearch/meilisearch). - `indexer/code`: Implementations for code indexer. - `indexer/code/internal`: Internal shared package for code indexer. - `indexer/code/[engine]`: Implementation via each engine for code indexer. - `indexer/issues`: Implementations for issues indexer. ### Deduplication - Combine `Init/Ping/Close` for code indexer and issues indexer. - ~Combine `issues.indexerHolder` and `code.wrappedIndexer` to `internal.IndexHolder`.~ Remove it, use dummy indexer instead when the indexer is not ready. - Duplicate two copies of creating ES clients. - Duplicate two copies of `indexerID()`. ### Enhancement - [x] Support index version for elasticsearch issues indexer, the old index without version will be treated as version 0. - [x] Fix spell of `elastic_search/ElasticSearch`, it should be `Elasticsearch`. - [x] Improve versioning of ES index. We don't need `Aliases`: - Gitea does't need aliases for "Zero Downtime" because it never delete old indexes. - The old code of issues indexer uses the orignal name to create issue index, so it's tricky to convert it to an alias. - [x] Support index version for meilisearch issues indexer, the old index without version will be treated as version 0. - [x] Do "ping" only when `Ping` has been called, don't ping periodically and cache the status. - [x] Support the context parameter whenever possible. - [x] Fix outdated example config. - [x] Give up the requeue logic of issues indexer: When indexing fails, call Ping to check if it was caused by the engine being unavailable, and only requeue the task if the engine is unavailable. - It is fragile and tricky, could cause data losing (It did happen when I was doing some tests for this PR). And it works for ES only. - Just always requeue the failed task, if it caused by bad data, it's a bug of Gitea which should be fixed. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-06-23 14:37:56 +02:00
func TestBleveIndexAndSearch(t *testing.T) {
unittest.PrepareTestEnv(t)
dir := t.TempDir()
idx := bleve.NewIndexer(dir)
defer idx.Close()
_, err := idx.Init(context.Background())
require.NoError(t, err)
Refactor indexer (#25174) Refactor `modules/indexer` to make it more maintainable. And it can be easier to support more features. I'm trying to solve some of issue searching, this is a precursor to making functional changes. Current supported engines and the index versions: | engines | issues | code | | - | - | - | | db | Just a wrapper for database queries, doesn't need version | - | | bleve | The version of index is **2** | The version of index is **6** | | elasticsearch | The old index has no version, will be treated as version **0** in this PR | The version of index is **1** | | meilisearch | The old index has no version, will be treated as version **0** in this PR | - | ## Changes ### Split Splited it into mutiple packages ```text indexer ├── internal │   ├── bleve │   ├── db │   ├── elasticsearch │   └── meilisearch ├── code │   ├── bleve │   ├── elasticsearch │   └── internal └── issues ├── bleve ├── db ├── elasticsearch ├── internal └── meilisearch ``` - `indexer/interanal`: Internal shared package for indexer. - `indexer/interanal/[engine]`: Internal shared package for each engine (bleve/db/elasticsearch/meilisearch). - `indexer/code`: Implementations for code indexer. - `indexer/code/internal`: Internal shared package for code indexer. - `indexer/code/[engine]`: Implementation via each engine for code indexer. - `indexer/issues`: Implementations for issues indexer. ### Deduplication - Combine `Init/Ping/Close` for code indexer and issues indexer. - ~Combine `issues.indexerHolder` and `code.wrappedIndexer` to `internal.IndexHolder`.~ Remove it, use dummy indexer instead when the indexer is not ready. - Duplicate two copies of creating ES clients. - Duplicate two copies of `indexerID()`. ### Enhancement - [x] Support index version for elasticsearch issues indexer, the old index without version will be treated as version 0. - [x] Fix spell of `elastic_search/ElasticSearch`, it should be `Elasticsearch`. - [x] Improve versioning of ES index. We don't need `Aliases`: - Gitea does't need aliases for "Zero Downtime" because it never delete old indexes. - The old code of issues indexer uses the orignal name to create issue index, so it's tricky to convert it to an alias. - [x] Support index version for meilisearch issues indexer, the old index without version will be treated as version 0. - [x] Do "ping" only when `Ping` has been called, don't ping periodically and cache the status. - [x] Support the context parameter whenever possible. - [x] Fix outdated example config. - [x] Give up the requeue logic of issues indexer: When indexing fails, call Ping to check if it was caused by the engine being unavailable, and only requeue the task if the engine is unavailable. - It is fragile and tricky, could cause data losing (It did happen when I was doing some tests for this PR). And it works for ES only. - Just always requeue the failed task, if it caused by bad data, it's a bug of Gitea which should be fixed. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-06-23 14:37:56 +02:00
testIndexer("beleve", t, idx)
}
func TestESIndexAndSearch(t *testing.T) {
unittest.PrepareTestEnv(t)
u := os.Getenv("TEST_INDEXER_CODE_ES_URL")
if u == "" {
t.SkipNow()
return
}
indexer := elasticsearch.NewIndexer(u, "gitea_codes")
if _, err := indexer.Init(context.Background()); err != nil {
if indexer != nil {
indexer.Close()
}
assert.FailNow(t, "Unable to init ES indexer Error: %v", err)
Refactor indexer (#25174) Refactor `modules/indexer` to make it more maintainable. And it can be easier to support more features. I'm trying to solve some of issue searching, this is a precursor to making functional changes. Current supported engines and the index versions: | engines | issues | code | | - | - | - | | db | Just a wrapper for database queries, doesn't need version | - | | bleve | The version of index is **2** | The version of index is **6** | | elasticsearch | The old index has no version, will be treated as version **0** in this PR | The version of index is **1** | | meilisearch | The old index has no version, will be treated as version **0** in this PR | - | ## Changes ### Split Splited it into mutiple packages ```text indexer ├── internal │   ├── bleve │   ├── db │   ├── elasticsearch │   └── meilisearch ├── code │   ├── bleve │   ├── elasticsearch │   └── internal └── issues ├── bleve ├── db ├── elasticsearch ├── internal └── meilisearch ``` - `indexer/interanal`: Internal shared package for indexer. - `indexer/interanal/[engine]`: Internal shared package for each engine (bleve/db/elasticsearch/meilisearch). - `indexer/code`: Implementations for code indexer. - `indexer/code/internal`: Internal shared package for code indexer. - `indexer/code/[engine]`: Implementation via each engine for code indexer. - `indexer/issues`: Implementations for issues indexer. ### Deduplication - Combine `Init/Ping/Close` for code indexer and issues indexer. - ~Combine `issues.indexerHolder` and `code.wrappedIndexer` to `internal.IndexHolder`.~ Remove it, use dummy indexer instead when the indexer is not ready. - Duplicate two copies of creating ES clients. - Duplicate two copies of `indexerID()`. ### Enhancement - [x] Support index version for elasticsearch issues indexer, the old index without version will be treated as version 0. - [x] Fix spell of `elastic_search/ElasticSearch`, it should be `Elasticsearch`. - [x] Improve versioning of ES index. We don't need `Aliases`: - Gitea does't need aliases for "Zero Downtime" because it never delete old indexes. - The old code of issues indexer uses the orignal name to create issue index, so it's tricky to convert it to an alias. - [x] Support index version for meilisearch issues indexer, the old index without version will be treated as version 0. - [x] Do "ping" only when `Ping` has been called, don't ping periodically and cache the status. - [x] Support the context parameter whenever possible. - [x] Fix outdated example config. - [x] Give up the requeue logic of issues indexer: When indexing fails, call Ping to check if it was caused by the engine being unavailable, and only requeue the task if the engine is unavailable. - It is fragile and tricky, could cause data losing (It did happen when I was doing some tests for this PR). And it works for ES only. - Just always requeue the failed task, if it caused by bad data, it's a bug of Gitea which should be fixed. --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-06-23 14:37:56 +02:00
}
defer indexer.Close()
testIndexer("elastic_search", t, indexer)
}
Allow code search by filename (#32210) This is a large and complex PR, so let me explain in detail its changes. First, I had to create new index mappings for Bleve and ElasticSerach as the current ones do not support search by filename. This requires Gitea to recreate the code search indexes (I do not know if this is a breaking change, but I feel it deserves a heads-up). I've used [this approach](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/7.17/analysis-pathhierarchy-tokenizer.html) to model the filename index. It allows us to efficiently search for both the full path and the name of a file. Bleve, however, does not support this out-of-box, so I had to code a brand new [token filter](https://blevesearch.com/docs/Token-Filters/) to generate the search terms. I also did an overhaul in the `indexer_test.go` file. It now asserts the order of the expected results (this is important since matches based on the name of a file are more relevant than those based on its content). I've added new test scenarios that deal with searching by filename. They use a new repo included in the Gitea fixture. The screenshot below depicts how Gitea shows the search results. It shows results based on content in the same way as the current version does. In matches based on the filename, the first seven lines of the file contents are shown (BTW, this is how GitHub does it). ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9d938d86-1a8d-4f89-8644-1921a473e858) Resolves #32096 --------- Signed-off-by: Bruno Sofiato <bruno.sofiato@gmail.com>
2024-10-12 01:35:04 +02:00
func setupRepositoryIndexes(ctx context.Context, indexer internal.Indexer) error {
for _, repoID := range repositoriesToSearch() {
if err := index(ctx, indexer, repoID); err != nil {
return err
}
}
return nil
}
func tearDownRepositoryIndexes(indexer internal.Indexer) error {
for _, repoID := range repositoriesToSearch() {
if err := indexer.Delete(context.Background(), repoID); err != nil {
return err
}
}
return nil
}
func repositoriesToSearch() []int64 {
return []int64{1, 62}
}