mirror of
https://github.com/django/django.git
synced 2024-11-30 07:06:18 +01:00
011a54315e
This is a security fix; disclosure to follow shortly.
44 lines
2.2 KiB
Plaintext
44 lines
2.2 KiB
Plaintext
===========================
|
|
Django 1.6.11 release notes
|
|
===========================
|
|
|
|
*March 18, 2015*
|
|
|
|
Django 1.6.11 fixes two security issues in 1.6.10.
|
|
|
|
Denial-of-service possibility with ``strip_tags()``
|
|
===================================================
|
|
|
|
Last year :func:`~django.utils.html.strip_tags` was changed to work
|
|
iteratively. The problem is that the size of the input it's processing can
|
|
increase on each iteration which results in an infinite loop in
|
|
``strip_tags()``. This issue only affects versions of Python that haven't
|
|
received `a bugfix in HTMLParser <http://bugs.python.org/issue20288>`_; namely
|
|
Python < 2.7.7 and 3.3.5. Some operating system vendors have also backported
|
|
the fix for the Python bug into their packages of earlier versions.
|
|
|
|
To remedy this issue, ``strip_tags()`` will now return the original input if
|
|
it detects the length of the string it's processing increases. Remember that
|
|
absolutely NO guarantee is provided about the results of ``strip_tags()`` being
|
|
HTML safe. So NEVER mark safe the result of a ``strip_tags()`` call without
|
|
escaping it first, for example with :func:`~django.utils.html.escape`.
|
|
|
|
Mitigated possible XSS attack via user-supplied redirect URLs
|
|
=============================================================
|
|
|
|
Django relies on user input in some cases (e.g.
|
|
:func:`django.contrib.auth.views.login` and :doc:`i18n </topics/i18n/index>`)
|
|
to redirect the user to an "on success" URL. The security checks for these
|
|
redirects (namely ``django.utils.http.is_safe_url()``) accepted URLs with
|
|
leading control characters and so considered URLs like ``\x08javascript:...``
|
|
safe. This issue doesn't affect Django currently, since we only put this URL
|
|
into the ``Location`` response header and browsers seem to ignore JavaScript
|
|
there. Browsers we tested also treat URLs prefixed with control characters such
|
|
as ``%08//example.com`` as relative paths so redirection to an unsafe target
|
|
isn't a problem either.
|
|
|
|
However, if a developer relies on ``is_safe_url()`` to
|
|
provide safe redirect targets and puts such a URL into a link, they could
|
|
suffer from an XSS attack as some browsers such as Google Chrome ignore control
|
|
characters at the start of a URL in an anchor ``href``.
|