mirror of
https://github.com/django/django.git
synced 2024-11-29 22:56:46 +01:00
4a954cfd11
This patch does not remove all occurrences of the words in question. Rather, I went through all of the occurrences of the words listed below, and judged if they a) suggested the reader had some kind of knowledge/experience, and b) if they added anything of value (including tone of voice, etc). I left most of the words alone. I looked at the following words: - simply/simple - easy/easier/easiest - obvious - just - merely - straightforward - ridiculous Thanks to Carlton Gibson for guidance on how to approach this issue, and to Tim Bell for providing the idea. But the enormous lion's share of thanks go to Adam Johnson for his patient and helpful review.
223 lines
9.8 KiB
Plaintext
223 lines
9.8 KiB
Plaintext
===========================
|
|
Conditional View Processing
|
|
===========================
|
|
|
|
HTTP clients can send a number of headers to tell the server about copies of a
|
|
resource that they have already seen. This is commonly used when retrieving a
|
|
Web page (using an HTTP ``GET`` request) to avoid sending all the data for
|
|
something the client has already retrieved. However, the same headers can be
|
|
used for all HTTP methods (``POST``, ``PUT``, ``DELETE``, etc.).
|
|
|
|
For each page (response) that Django sends back from a view, it might provide
|
|
two HTTP headers: the ``ETag`` header and the ``Last-Modified`` header. These
|
|
headers are optional on HTTP responses. They can be set by your view function,
|
|
or you can rely on the :class:`~django.middleware.http.ConditionalGetMiddleware`
|
|
middleware to set the ``ETag`` header.
|
|
|
|
When the client next requests the same resource, it might send along a header
|
|
such as either `If-modified-since`_ or `If-unmodified-since`_, containing the
|
|
date of the last modification time it was sent, or either `If-match`_ or
|
|
`If-none-match`_, containing the last ``ETag`` it was sent.
|
|
If the current version of the page matches the ``ETag`` sent by the client, or
|
|
if the resource has not been modified, a 304 status code can be sent back,
|
|
instead of a full response, telling the client that nothing has changed.
|
|
Depending on the header, if the page has been modified or does not match the
|
|
``ETag`` sent by the client, a 412 status code (Precondition Failed) may be
|
|
returned.
|
|
|
|
.. _If-match: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7232#section-3.1
|
|
.. _If-none-match: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7232#section-3.2
|
|
.. _If-modified-since: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7232#section-3.3
|
|
.. _If-unmodified-since: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7232#section-3.4
|
|
|
|
When you need more fine-grained control you may use per-view conditional
|
|
processing functions.
|
|
|
|
.. _conditional-decorators:
|
|
|
|
The ``condition`` decorator
|
|
===========================
|
|
|
|
Sometimes (in fact, quite often) you can create functions to rapidly compute the ETag_
|
|
value or the last-modified time for a resource, **without** needing to do all
|
|
the computations needed to construct the full view. Django can then use these
|
|
functions to provide an "early bailout" option for the view processing.
|
|
Telling the client that the content has not been modified since the last
|
|
request, perhaps.
|
|
|
|
.. _ETag: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7232#section-2.3
|
|
|
|
These two functions are passed as parameters to the
|
|
``django.views.decorators.http.condition`` decorator. This decorator uses
|
|
the two functions (you only need to supply one, if you can't compute both
|
|
quantities easily and quickly) to work out if the headers in the HTTP request
|
|
match those on the resource. If they don't match, a new copy of the resource
|
|
must be computed and your normal view is called.
|
|
|
|
The ``condition`` decorator's signature looks like this::
|
|
|
|
condition(etag_func=None, last_modified_func=None)
|
|
|
|
The two functions, to compute the ETag and the last modified time, will be
|
|
passed the incoming ``request`` object and the same parameters, in the same
|
|
order, as the view function they are helping to wrap. The function passed
|
|
``last_modified_func`` should return a standard datetime value specifying the
|
|
last time the resource was modified, or ``None`` if the resource doesn't
|
|
exist. The function passed to the ``etag`` decorator should return a string
|
|
representing the `ETag`_ for the resource, or ``None`` if it doesn't exist.
|
|
|
|
The decorator sets the ``ETag`` and ``Last-Modified`` headers on the response
|
|
if they are not already set by the view and if the request's method is safe
|
|
(``GET`` or ``HEAD``).
|
|
|
|
Using this feature usefully is probably best explained with an example.
|
|
Suppose you have this pair of models, representing a small blog system::
|
|
|
|
import datetime
|
|
from django.db import models
|
|
|
|
class Blog(models.Model):
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
class Entry(models.Model):
|
|
blog = models.ForeignKey(Blog, on_delete=models.CASCADE)
|
|
published = models.DateTimeField(default=datetime.datetime.now)
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
If the front page, displaying the latest blog entries, only changes when you
|
|
add a new blog entry, you can compute the last modified time very quickly. You
|
|
need the latest ``published`` date for every entry associated with that blog.
|
|
One way to do this would be::
|
|
|
|
def latest_entry(request, blog_id):
|
|
return Entry.objects.filter(blog=blog_id).latest("published").published
|
|
|
|
You can then use this function to provide early detection of an unchanged page
|
|
for your front page view::
|
|
|
|
from django.views.decorators.http import condition
|
|
|
|
@condition(last_modified_func=latest_entry)
|
|
def front_page(request, blog_id):
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Be careful with the order of decorators
|
|
|
|
When ``condition()`` returns a conditional response, any decorators below
|
|
it will be skipped and won't apply to the response. Therefore, any
|
|
decorators that need to apply to both the regular view response and a
|
|
conditional response must be above ``condition()``. In particular,
|
|
:func:`~django.views.decorators.vary.vary_on_cookie`,
|
|
:func:`~django.views.decorators.vary.vary_on_headers`, and
|
|
:func:`~django.views.decorators.cache.cache_control` should come first
|
|
because :rfc:`RFC 7232 <7232#section-4.1>` requires that the headers they
|
|
set be present on 304 responses.
|
|
|
|
Shortcuts for only computing one value
|
|
======================================
|
|
|
|
As a general rule, if you can provide functions to compute *both* the ETag and
|
|
the last modified time, you should do so. You don't know which headers any
|
|
given HTTP client will send you, so be prepared to handle both. However,
|
|
sometimes only one value is easy to compute and Django provides decorators
|
|
that handle only ETag or only last-modified computations.
|
|
|
|
The ``django.views.decorators.http.etag`` and
|
|
``django.views.decorators.http.last_modified`` decorators are passed the same
|
|
type of functions as the ``condition`` decorator. Their signatures are::
|
|
|
|
etag(etag_func)
|
|
last_modified(last_modified_func)
|
|
|
|
We could write the earlier example, which only uses a last-modified function,
|
|
using one of these decorators::
|
|
|
|
@last_modified(latest_entry)
|
|
def front_page(request, blog_id):
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
...or::
|
|
|
|
def front_page(request, blog_id):
|
|
...
|
|
front_page = last_modified(latest_entry)(front_page)
|
|
|
|
Use ``condition`` when testing both conditions
|
|
----------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
It might look nicer to some people to try and chain the ``etag`` and
|
|
``last_modified`` decorators if you want to test both preconditions. However,
|
|
this would lead to incorrect behavior.
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
# Bad code. Don't do this!
|
|
@etag(etag_func)
|
|
@last_modified(last_modified_func)
|
|
def my_view(request):
|
|
# ...
|
|
|
|
# End of bad code.
|
|
|
|
The first decorator doesn't know anything about the second and might
|
|
answer that the response is not modified even if the second decorators would
|
|
determine otherwise. The ``condition`` decorator uses both callback functions
|
|
simultaneously to work out the right action to take.
|
|
|
|
Using the decorators with other HTTP methods
|
|
============================================
|
|
|
|
The ``condition`` decorator is useful for more than only ``GET`` and
|
|
``HEAD`` requests (``HEAD`` requests are the same as ``GET`` in this
|
|
situation). It can also be used to provide checking for ``POST``,
|
|
``PUT`` and ``DELETE`` requests. In these situations, the idea isn't to return
|
|
a "not modified" response, but to tell the client that the resource they are
|
|
trying to change has been altered in the meantime.
|
|
|
|
For example, consider the following exchange between the client and server:
|
|
|
|
#. Client requests ``/foo/``.
|
|
#. Server responds with some content with an ETag of ``"abcd1234"``.
|
|
#. Client sends an HTTP ``PUT`` request to ``/foo/`` to update the
|
|
resource. It also sends an ``If-Match: "abcd1234"`` header to specify
|
|
the version it is trying to update.
|
|
#. Server checks to see if the resource has changed, by computing the ETag
|
|
the same way it does for a ``GET`` request (using the same function).
|
|
If the resource *has* changed, it will return a 412 status code,
|
|
meaning "precondition failed".
|
|
#. Client sends a ``GET`` request to ``/foo/``, after receiving a 412
|
|
response, to retrieve an updated version of the content before updating
|
|
it.
|
|
|
|
The important thing this example shows is that the same functions can be used
|
|
to compute the ETag and last modification values in all situations. In fact,
|
|
you **should** use the same functions, so that the same values are returned
|
|
every time.
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Validator headers with non-safe request methods
|
|
|
|
The ``condition`` decorator only sets validator headers (``ETag`` and
|
|
``Last-Modified``) for safe HTTP methods, i.e. ``GET`` and ``HEAD``. If you
|
|
wish to return them in other cases, set them in your view. See
|
|
:rfc:`7231#section-4.3.4` to learn about the distinction between setting a
|
|
validator header in response to requests made with ``PUT`` versus ``POST``.
|
|
|
|
Comparison with middleware conditional processing
|
|
=================================================
|
|
|
|
Django provides conditional ``GET`` handling via
|
|
:class:`django.middleware.http.ConditionalGetMiddleware`. While being suitable
|
|
for many situations, the middleware has limitations for advanced usage:
|
|
|
|
* It's applied globally to all views in your project.
|
|
* It doesn't save you from generating the response, which may be expensive.
|
|
* It's only appropriate for HTTP ``GET`` requests.
|
|
|
|
You should choose the most appropriate tool for your particular problem here.
|
|
If you have a way to compute ETags and modification times quickly and if some
|
|
view takes a while to generate the content, you should consider using the
|
|
``condition`` decorator described in this document. If everything already runs
|
|
fairly quickly, stick to using the middleware and the amount of network
|
|
traffic sent back to the clients will still be reduced if the view hasn't
|
|
changed.
|