mirror of
https://github.com/django/django.git
synced 2024-11-28 10:48:32 +01:00
5d6f91e415
Fixed #6123, #6133, #6179, #6194. git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@6923 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
583 lines
24 KiB
Plaintext
583 lines
24 KiB
Plaintext
===================
|
|
Custom model fields
|
|
===================
|
|
|
|
**New in Django development version**
|
|
|
|
Introduction
|
|
============
|
|
|
|
The `model reference`_ documentation explains how to use Django's standard
|
|
field classes -- ``CharField``, ``DateField``, etc. For many purposes, those
|
|
classes are all you'll need. Sometimes, though, the Django version won't meet
|
|
your precise requirements, or you'll want to use a field that is entirely
|
|
different from those shipped with Django.
|
|
|
|
Django's built-in field types don't cover every possible database column type --
|
|
only the common types, such as ``VARCHAR`` and ``INTEGER``. For more obscure
|
|
column types, such as geographic polygons or even user-created types such as
|
|
`PostgreSQL custom types`_, you can define your own Django ``Field`` subclasses.
|
|
|
|
Alternatively, you may have a complex Python object that can somehow be
|
|
serialized to fit into a standard database column type. This is another case
|
|
where a ``Field`` subclass will help you use your object with your models.
|
|
|
|
Our example object
|
|
------------------
|
|
|
|
Creating custom fields requires a bit of attention to detail. To make things
|
|
easier to follow, we'll use a consistent example throughout this document.
|
|
Suppose you have a Python object representing the deal of cards in a hand of
|
|
Bridge_. (Don't worry, you don't know how to play Bridge to follow this
|
|
example. You only need to know that 52 cards are dealt out equally to four
|
|
players, who are traditionally called *north*, *east*, *south* and *west*.)
|
|
Our class looks something like this::
|
|
|
|
class Hand(object):
|
|
def __init__(self, north, east, south, west):
|
|
# Input parameters are lists of cards ('Ah', '9s', etc)
|
|
self.north = north
|
|
self.east = east
|
|
self.south = south
|
|
self.west = west
|
|
|
|
# ... (other possibly useful methods omitted) ...
|
|
|
|
This is just an ordinary Python class, with nothing Django-specific about it.
|
|
We'd like to be able to do things like this in our models (we assume the
|
|
``hand`` attribute on the model is an instance of ``Hand``)::
|
|
|
|
example = MyModel.objects.get(pk=1)
|
|
print example.hand.north
|
|
|
|
new_hand = Hand(north, east, south, west)
|
|
example.hand = new_hand
|
|
example.save()
|
|
|
|
We assign to and retrieve from the ``hand`` attribute in our model just like
|
|
any other Python class. The trick is to tell Django how to handle saving and
|
|
loading such an object.
|
|
|
|
In order to use the ``Hand`` class in our models, we **do not** have to change
|
|
this class at all. This is ideal, because it means you can easily write
|
|
model support for existing classes where you cannot change the source code.
|
|
|
|
.. note::
|
|
You might only be wanting to take advantage of custom database column
|
|
types and deal with the data as standard Python types in your models;
|
|
strings, or floats, for example. This case is similar to our ``Hand``
|
|
example and we'll note any differences as we go along.
|
|
|
|
.. _model reference: ../model_api/
|
|
.. _PostgreSQL custom types: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/interactive/sql-createtype.html
|
|
.. _Bridge: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contract_bridge
|
|
|
|
Background theory
|
|
=================
|
|
|
|
Database storage
|
|
----------------
|
|
|
|
The simplest way to think of a model field is that it provides a way to take a
|
|
normal Python object -- string, boolean, ``datetime``, or something more
|
|
complex like ``Hand`` -- and convert it to and from a format that is useful
|
|
when dealing with the database (and serialization, but, as we'll see later,
|
|
that falls out fairly naturally once you have the database side under control).
|
|
|
|
Fields in a model must somehow be converted to fit into an existing database
|
|
column type. Different databases provide different sets of valid column types,
|
|
but the rule is still the same: those are the only types you have to work
|
|
with. Anything you want to store in the database must fit into one of
|
|
those types.
|
|
|
|
Normally, you're either writing a Django field to match a particular database
|
|
column type, or there's a fairly straightforward way to convert your data to,
|
|
say, a string.
|
|
|
|
For our ``Hand`` example, we could convert the card data to a string of 104
|
|
characters by concatenating all the cards together in a pre-determined order --
|
|
say, all the *north* cards first, then the *east*, *south* and *west* cards. So
|
|
``Hand`` objects can be saved to text or character columns in the database.
|
|
|
|
What does a field class do?
|
|
---------------------------
|
|
|
|
All of Django's fields (and when we say *fields* in this document, we always
|
|
mean model fields and not `form fields`_) are subclasses of
|
|
``django.db.models.Field``. Most of the information that Django records about a
|
|
field is common to all fields -- name, help text, validator lists, uniqueness
|
|
and so forth. Storing all that information is handled by ``Field``. We'll get
|
|
into the precise details of what ``Field`` can do later on; for now, suffice it
|
|
to say that everything descends from ``Field`` and then customizes key pieces
|
|
of the class behavior.
|
|
|
|
.. _form fields: ../newforms/#fields
|
|
|
|
It's important to realize that a Django field class is not what is stored in
|
|
your model attributes. The model attributes contain normal Python objects. The
|
|
field classes you define in a model are actually stored in the ``Meta`` class
|
|
when the model class is created (the precise details of how this is done are
|
|
unimportant here). This is because the field classes aren't necessary when
|
|
you're just creating and modifying attributes. Instead, they provide the
|
|
machinery for converting between the attribute value and what is stored in the
|
|
database or sent to the serializer.
|
|
|
|
Keep this in mind when creating your own custom fields. The Django ``Field``
|
|
subclass you write provides the machinery for converting between your Python
|
|
instances and the database/serializer values in various ways (there are
|
|
differences between storing a value and using a value for lookups, for
|
|
example). If this sounds a bit tricky, don't worry -- it will become clearer in
|
|
the examples below. Just remember that you will often end up creating two
|
|
classes when you want a custom field:
|
|
|
|
* The first class is the Python object that your users will manipulate.
|
|
They will assign it to the model attribute, they will read from it for
|
|
displaying purposes, things like that. This is the ``Hand`` class in our
|
|
example.
|
|
|
|
* The second class is the ``Field`` subclass. This is the class that knows
|
|
how to convert your first class back and forth between its permanent
|
|
storage form and the Python form.
|
|
|
|
Writing a ``Field`` subclass
|
|
=============================
|
|
|
|
When planning your ``Field`` subclass, first give some thought to which
|
|
existing ``Field`` class your new field is most similar to. Can you subclass an
|
|
existing Django field and save yourself some work? If not, you should subclass
|
|
the ``Field`` class, from which everything is descended.
|
|
|
|
Initializing your new field is a matter of separating out any arguments that
|
|
are specific to your case from the common arguments and passing the latter to
|
|
the ``__init__()`` method of ``Field`` (or your parent class).
|
|
|
|
In our example, we'll call our field ``HandField``. (It's a good idea to call
|
|
your ``Field`` subclass ``(Something)Field``, so it's easily identifiable as a
|
|
``Field`` subclass.) It doesn't behave like any existing field, so we'll
|
|
subclass directly from ``Field``::
|
|
|
|
from django.db import models
|
|
|
|
class HandField(models.Field):
|
|
def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
|
|
kwargs['max_length'] = 104
|
|
super(HandField, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs)
|
|
|
|
Our ``HandField`` accept most of the standard field options (see the list
|
|
below), but we ensure it has a fixed length, since it only needs to hold 52
|
|
card values plus their suits; 104 characters in total.
|
|
|
|
.. note::
|
|
Many of Django's model fields accept options that they don't do anything
|
|
with. For example, you can pass both ``editable`` and ``auto_now`` to a
|
|
``DateField`` and it will simply ignore the ``editable`` parameter
|
|
(``auto_now`` being set implies ``editable=False``). No error is raised in
|
|
this case.
|
|
|
|
This behavior simplifies the field classes, because they don't need to
|
|
check for options that aren't necessary. They just pass all the options to
|
|
the parent class and then don't use them later on. It's up to you whether
|
|
you want your fields to be more strict about the options they select, or
|
|
to use the simpler, more permissive behavior of the current fields.
|
|
|
|
The ``Field.__init__()`` method takes the following parameters, in this
|
|
order:
|
|
|
|
* ``verbose_name``
|
|
* ``name``
|
|
* ``primary_key``
|
|
* ``max_length``
|
|
* ``unique``
|
|
* ``blank``
|
|
* ``null``
|
|
* ``db_index``
|
|
* ``core``
|
|
* ``rel``: Used for related fields (like ``ForeignKey``). For advanced use
|
|
only.
|
|
* ``default``
|
|
* ``editable``
|
|
* ``serialize``: If ``False``, the field will not be serialized when the
|
|
model is passed to Django's serializers_. Defaults to ``True``.
|
|
* ``prepopulate_from``
|
|
* ``unique_for_date``
|
|
* ``unique_for_month``
|
|
* ``unique_for_year``
|
|
* ``validator_list``
|
|
* ``choices``
|
|
* ``radio_admin``
|
|
* ``help_text``
|
|
* ``db_column``
|
|
* ``db_tablespace``: Currently only used with the Oracle backend and only
|
|
for index creation. You can usually ignore this option.
|
|
|
|
All of the options without an explanation in the above list have the same
|
|
meaning they do for normal Django fields. See the `model documentation`_ for
|
|
examples and details.
|
|
|
|
.. _serializers: ../serialization/
|
|
.. _model documentation: ../model-api/
|
|
|
|
The ``SubfieldBase`` metaclass
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
As we indicated in the introduction_, field subclasses are often needed for
|
|
two reasons: either to take advantage of a custom database column type, or to
|
|
handle complex Python types. Obviously, a combination of the two is also
|
|
possible. If you're only working with custom database column types and your
|
|
model fields appear in Python as standard Python types direct from the
|
|
database backend, you don't need to worry about this section.
|
|
|
|
If you're handling custom Python types, such as our ``Hand`` class, we need
|
|
to make sure that when Django initializes an instance of our model and assigns
|
|
a database value to our custom field attribute, we convert that value into the
|
|
appropriate Python object. The details of how this happens internally are a
|
|
little complex, but the code you need to write in your ``Field`` class is
|
|
simple: make sure your field subclass uses ``django.db.models.SubfieldBase`` as
|
|
its metaclass::
|
|
|
|
class HandField(models.Field):
|
|
__metaclass__ = models.SubfieldBase
|
|
|
|
def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
|
|
# ...
|
|
|
|
This ensures that the ``to_python()`` method, documented below_, will always be
|
|
called when the attribute is initialized.
|
|
|
|
.. _below: #to-python-self-value
|
|
|
|
Useful methods
|
|
--------------
|
|
|
|
Once you've created your ``Field`` subclass and set up up the
|
|
``__metaclass__``, you might consider overriding a few standard methods,
|
|
depending on your field's behavior. The list of methods below is in
|
|
approximately decreasing order of importance, so start from the top.
|
|
|
|
``db_type(self)``
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
Returns the database column data type for the ``Field``, taking into account
|
|
the current ``DATABASE_ENGINE`` setting.
|
|
|
|
Say you've created a PostgreSQL custom type called ``mytype``. You can use this
|
|
field with Django by subclassing ``Field`` and implementing the ``db_type()``
|
|
method, like so::
|
|
|
|
from django.db import models
|
|
|
|
class MytypeField(models.Field):
|
|
def db_type(self):
|
|
return 'mytype'
|
|
|
|
Once you have ``MytypeField``, you can use it in any model, just like any other
|
|
``Field`` type::
|
|
|
|
class Person(models.Model):
|
|
name = models.CharField(max_length=80)
|
|
gender = models.CharField(max_length=1)
|
|
something_else = MytypeField()
|
|
|
|
If you aim to build a database-agnostic application, you should account for
|
|
differences in database column types. For example, the date/time column type
|
|
in PostgreSQL is called ``timestamp``, while the same column in MySQL is called
|
|
``datetime``. The simplest way to handle this in a ``db_type()`` method is to
|
|
import the Django settings module and check the ``DATABASE_ENGINE`` setting.
|
|
For example::
|
|
|
|
class MyDateField(models.Field):
|
|
def db_type(self):
|
|
from django.conf import settings
|
|
if settings.DATABASE_ENGINE == 'mysql':
|
|
return 'datetime'
|
|
else:
|
|
return 'timestamp'
|
|
|
|
The ``db_type()`` method is only called by Django when the framework constructs
|
|
the ``CREATE TABLE`` statements for your application -- that is, when you first
|
|
create your tables. It's not called at any other time, so it can afford to
|
|
execute slightly complex code, such as the ``DATABASE_ENGINE`` check in the
|
|
above example.
|
|
|
|
Some database column types accept parameters, such as ``CHAR(25)``, where the
|
|
parameter ``25`` represents the maximum column length. In cases like these,
|
|
it's more flexible if the parameter is specified in the model rather than being
|
|
hard-coded in the ``db_type()`` method. For example, it wouldn't make much
|
|
sense to have a ``CharMaxlength25Field``, shown here::
|
|
|
|
# This is a silly example of hard-coded parameters.
|
|
class CharMaxlength25Field(models.Field):
|
|
def db_type(self):
|
|
return 'char(25)'
|
|
|
|
# In the model:
|
|
class MyModel(models.Model):
|
|
# ...
|
|
my_field = CharMaxlength25Field()
|
|
|
|
The better way of doing this would be to make the parameter specifiable at run
|
|
time -- i.e., when the class is instantiated. To do that, just implement
|
|
``__init__()``, like so::
|
|
|
|
# This is a much more flexible example.
|
|
class BetterCharField(models.Field):
|
|
def __init__(self, max_length, *args, **kwargs):
|
|
self.max_length = max_length
|
|
super(BetterCharField, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs)
|
|
|
|
def db_type(self):
|
|
return 'char(%s)' % self.max_length
|
|
|
|
# In the model:
|
|
class MyModel(models.Model):
|
|
# ...
|
|
my_field = BetterCharField(25)
|
|
|
|
Finally, if your column requires truly complex SQL setup, return ``None`` from
|
|
``db_type()``. This will cause Django's SQL creation code to skip over this
|
|
field. You are then responsible for creating the column in the right table in
|
|
some other way, of course, but this gives you a way to tell Django to get out
|
|
of the way.
|
|
|
|
``to_python(self, value)``
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
Converts a value as returned by your database (or a serializer) to a Python
|
|
object.
|
|
|
|
The default implementation simply returns ``value``, for the common case in
|
|
which the database backend already returns data in the correct format (as a
|
|
Python string, for example).
|
|
|
|
If your custom ``Field`` class deals with data structures that are more complex
|
|
than strings, dates, integers or floats, then you'll need to override this
|
|
method. As a general rule, the method should deal gracefully with any of the
|
|
following arguments:
|
|
|
|
* An instance of the correct type (e.g., ``Hand`` in our ongoing example).
|
|
|
|
* A string (e.g., from a deserializer).
|
|
|
|
* Whatever the database returns for the column type you're using.
|
|
|
|
In our ``HandField`` class, we're storing the data as a VARCHAR field in the
|
|
database, so we need to be able to process strings and ``Hand`` instances in
|
|
``to_python()``::
|
|
|
|
import re
|
|
|
|
class HandField(models.Field):
|
|
# ...
|
|
|
|
def to_python(self, value):
|
|
if isinstance(value, Hand):
|
|
return value
|
|
|
|
# The string case.
|
|
p1 = re.compile('.{26}')
|
|
p2 = re.compile('..')
|
|
args = [p2.findall(x) for x in p1.findall(value)]
|
|
return Hand(*args)
|
|
|
|
Notice that we always return a ``Hand`` instance from this method. That's the
|
|
Python object type we want to store in the model's attribute.
|
|
|
|
**Remember:** If your custom field needs the ``to_python()`` method to be
|
|
called when it is created, you should be using `The SubfieldBase metaclass`_
|
|
mentioned earlier. Otherwise ``to_python()`` won't be called automatically.
|
|
|
|
``get_db_prep_save(self, value)``
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
This is the reverse of ``to_python()`` when working with the database backends
|
|
(as opposed to serialization). The ``value`` parameter is the current value of
|
|
the model's attribute (a field has no reference to its containing model, so it
|
|
cannot retrieve the value itself), and the method should return data in a
|
|
format that can be used as a parameter in a query for the database backend.
|
|
|
|
For example::
|
|
|
|
class HandField(models.Field):
|
|
# ...
|
|
|
|
def get_db_prep_save(self, value):
|
|
return ''.join([''.join(l) for l in (self.north,
|
|
self.east, self.south, self.west)])
|
|
|
|
``pre_save(self, model_instance, add)``
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
This method is called just prior to ``get_db_prep_save()`` and should return
|
|
the value of the appropriate attribute from ``model_instance`` for this field.
|
|
The attribute name is in ``self.attname`` (this is set up by ``Field``). If
|
|
the model is being saved to the database for the first time, the ``add``
|
|
parameter will be ``True``, otherwise it will be ``False``.
|
|
|
|
You only need to override this method if you want to preprocess the value
|
|
somehow, just before saving. For example, Django's ``DateTimeField`` uses this
|
|
method to set the attribute correctly in the case of ``auto_now`` or
|
|
``auto_now_add``.
|
|
|
|
If you do override this method, you must return the value of the attribute at
|
|
the end. You should also update the model's attribute if you make any changes
|
|
to the value so that code holding references to the model will always see the
|
|
correct value.
|
|
|
|
``get_db_prep_lookup(self, lookup_type, value)``
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
Prepares the ``value`` for passing to the database when used in a lookup (a
|
|
``WHERE`` constraint in SQL). The ``lookup_type`` will be one of the valid
|
|
Django filter lookups: ``exact``, ``iexact``, ``contains``, ``icontains``,
|
|
``gt``, ``gte``, ``lt``, ``lte``, ``in``, ``startswith``, ``istartswith``,
|
|
``endswith``, ``iendswith``, ``range``, ``year``, ``month``, ``day``,
|
|
``isnull``, ``search``, ``regex``, and ``iregex``.
|
|
|
|
Your method must be prepared to handle all of these ``lookup_type`` values and
|
|
should raise either a ``ValueError`` if the ``value`` is of the wrong sort (a
|
|
list when you were expecting an object, for example) or a ``TypeError`` if
|
|
your field does not support that type of lookup. For many fields, you can get
|
|
by with handling the lookup types that need special handling for your field
|
|
and pass the rest of the ``get_db_prep_lookup()`` method of the parent class.
|
|
|
|
If you needed to implement ``get_db_prep_save()``, you will usually need to
|
|
implement ``get_db_prep_lookup()``. The usual reason is because of the
|
|
``range`` and ``in`` lookups. In these case, you will passed a list of
|
|
objects (presumably of the right type) and will need to convert them to a list
|
|
of things of the right type for passing to the database. Sometimes you can
|
|
reuse ``get_db_prep_save()``, or at least factor out some common pieces from
|
|
both methods into a help function.
|
|
|
|
For example::
|
|
|
|
class HandField(models.Field):
|
|
# ...
|
|
|
|
def get_db_prep_lookup(self, lookup_type, value):
|
|
# We only handle 'exact' and 'in'. All others are errors.
|
|
if lookup_type == 'exact':
|
|
return self.get_db_prep_save(value)
|
|
elif lookup_type == 'in':
|
|
return [self.get_db_prep_save(v) for v in value]
|
|
else:
|
|
raise TypeError('Lookup type %r not supported.' % lookup_type)
|
|
|
|
|
|
``formfield(self, form_class=forms.CharField, **kwargs)``
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
Returns the default form field to use when this field is displayed
|
|
in a model. This method is called by the `helper functions`_
|
|
``form_for_model()`` and ``form_for_instance()``.
|
|
|
|
All of the ``kwargs`` dictionary is passed directly to the form field's
|
|
``__init__()`` method. Normally, all you need to do is set up a good default
|
|
for the ``form_class`` argument and then delegate further handling to the
|
|
parent class. This might require you to write a custom form field (and even a
|
|
form widget). See the `forms documentation`_ for information about this, and
|
|
take a look at the code in ``django.contrib.localflavor`` for some examples of
|
|
custom widgets.
|
|
|
|
Continuing our ongoing example, we can write the ``formfield()`` method as::
|
|
|
|
class HandField(models.Field):
|
|
# ...
|
|
|
|
def formfield(self, **kwargs):
|
|
# This is a fairly standard way to set up some defaults
|
|
# while letting the caller override them.
|
|
defaults = {'form_class': MyFormField}
|
|
defaults.update(kwargs)
|
|
return super(HandField, self).formfield(**defaults)
|
|
|
|
This assumes we're imported a ``MyFormField`` field class (which has its own
|
|
default widget). This document doesn't cover the details of writing custom form
|
|
fields.
|
|
|
|
.. _helper functions: ../newforms/#generating-forms-for-models
|
|
.. _forms documentation: ../newforms/
|
|
|
|
``get_internal_type(self)``
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
Returns a string giving the name of the ``Field`` subclass we are emulating at
|
|
the database level. This is used to determine the type of database column for
|
|
simple cases.
|
|
|
|
If you have created a ``db_type()`` method, you don't need to worry about
|
|
``get_internal_type()`` -- it won't be used much. Sometimes, though, your
|
|
database storage is similar in type to some other field, so you can use that
|
|
other field's logic to create the right column.
|
|
|
|
For example::
|
|
|
|
class HandField(models.Field):
|
|
# ...
|
|
|
|
def get_internal_type(self):
|
|
return 'CharField'
|
|
|
|
No matter which database backend we are using, this will mean that ``syncdb``
|
|
and other SQL commands create the right column type for storing a string.
|
|
|
|
If ``get_internal_type()`` returns a string that is not known to Django for
|
|
the database backend you are using -- that is, it doesn't appear in
|
|
``django.db.backends.<db_name>.creation.DATA_TYPES`` -- the string will still
|
|
be used by the serializer, but the default ``db_type()`` method will return
|
|
``None``. See the documentation of ``db_type()`` above_ for reasons why this
|
|
might be useful. Putting a descriptive string in as the type of the field for
|
|
the serializer is a useful idea if you're ever going to be using the
|
|
serializer output in some other place, outside of Django.
|
|
|
|
.. _above: #db-type-self
|
|
|
|
``flatten_data(self, follow, obj=None)``
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Subject to change
|
|
|
|
Although implementing this method is necessary to allow field
|
|
serialization, the API might change in the future.
|
|
|
|
Returns a dictionary, mapping the field's attribute name to a flattened string
|
|
version of the data. This method has some internal uses that aren't of
|
|
interest to use here (mostly having to do with manipulators). For our
|
|
purposes, it's sufficient to return a one item dictionary that maps the
|
|
attribute name to a string.
|
|
|
|
This method is used by the serializers to convert the field into a string for
|
|
output. You can ignore the input parameters for serialization purposes,
|
|
although calling ``Field._get_val_from_obj(obj)`` is the best way to get the
|
|
value to serialize.
|
|
|
|
For example, since our ``HandField`` uses strings for its data storage anyway,
|
|
we can reuse some existing conversion code::
|
|
|
|
class HandField(models.Field):
|
|
# ...
|
|
|
|
def flatten_data(self, follow, obj=None):
|
|
value = self._get_val_from_obj(obj)
|
|
return {self.attname: self.get_db_prep_save(value)}
|
|
|
|
Some general advice
|
|
--------------------
|
|
|
|
Writing a custom field can be a tricky process, particularly if you're doing
|
|
complex conversions between your Python types and your database and
|
|
serialization formats. Here are a couple of tips to make things go more
|
|
smoothly:
|
|
|
|
1. Look at the existing Django fields (in
|
|
``django/db/models/fields/__init__.py``) for inspiration. Try to find a
|
|
field that's similar to what you want and extend it a little bit,
|
|
instead of creating an entirely new field from scratch.
|
|
|
|
2. Put a ``__str__()`` or ``__unicode__()`` method on the class you're
|
|
wrapping up as a field. There are a lot of places where the default
|
|
behavior of the field code is to call ``force_unicode()`` on the value.
|
|
(In our examples in this document, ``value`` would be a ``Hand``
|
|
instance, not a ``HandField``). So if your ``__unicode__()`` method
|
|
automatically converts to the string form of your Python object, you can
|
|
save yourself a lot of work.
|