mirror of
https://github.com/django/django.git
synced 2024-11-28 10:48:32 +01:00
eba093e8b0
Per deprecation timeline.
1185 lines
49 KiB
Plaintext
1185 lines
49 KiB
Plaintext
====================================
|
|
Customizing authentication in Django
|
|
====================================
|
|
|
|
The authentication that comes with Django is good enough for most common cases,
|
|
but you may have needs not met by the out-of-the-box defaults. To customize
|
|
authentication to your projects needs involves understanding what points of the
|
|
provided system are extensible or replaceable. This document provides details
|
|
about how the auth system can be customized.
|
|
|
|
:ref:`Authentication backends <authentication-backends>` provide an extensible
|
|
system for when a username and password stored with the user model need to be
|
|
authenticated against a different service than Django's default.
|
|
|
|
You can give your models :ref:`custom permissions <custom-permissions>` that
|
|
can be checked through Django's authorization system.
|
|
|
|
You can :ref:`extend <extending-user>` the default ``User`` model, or
|
|
:ref:`substitute <auth-custom-user>` a completely customized model.
|
|
|
|
.. _authentication-backends:
|
|
|
|
Other authentication sources
|
|
============================
|
|
|
|
There may be times you have the need to hook into another authentication source
|
|
-- that is, another source of usernames and passwords or authentication
|
|
methods.
|
|
|
|
For example, your company may already have an LDAP setup that stores a username
|
|
and password for every employee. It'd be a hassle for both the network
|
|
administrator and the users themselves if users had separate accounts in LDAP
|
|
and the Django-based applications.
|
|
|
|
So, to handle situations like this, the Django authentication system lets you
|
|
plug in other authentication sources. You can override Django's default
|
|
database-based scheme, or you can use the default system in tandem with other
|
|
systems.
|
|
|
|
See the :ref:`authentication backend reference
|
|
<authentication-backends-reference>` for information on the authentication
|
|
backends included with Django.
|
|
|
|
Specifying authentication backends
|
|
----------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Behind the scenes, Django maintains a list of "authentication backends" that it
|
|
checks for authentication. When somebody calls
|
|
:func:`django.contrib.auth.authenticate()` -- as described in :ref:`How to log
|
|
a user in <how-to-log-a-user-in>` -- Django tries authenticating across
|
|
all of its authentication backends. If the first authentication method fails,
|
|
Django tries the second one, and so on, until all backends have been attempted.
|
|
|
|
The list of authentication backends to use is specified in the
|
|
:setting:`AUTHENTICATION_BACKENDS` setting. This should be a list of Python
|
|
path names that point to Python classes that know how to authenticate. These
|
|
classes can be anywhere on your Python path.
|
|
|
|
By default, :setting:`AUTHENTICATION_BACKENDS` is set to::
|
|
|
|
['django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend']
|
|
|
|
That's the basic authentication backend that checks the Django users database
|
|
and queries the built-in permissions. It does not provide protection against
|
|
brute force attacks via any rate limiting mechanism. You may either implement
|
|
your own rate limiting mechanism in a custom auth backend, or use the
|
|
mechanisms provided by most Web servers.
|
|
|
|
The order of :setting:`AUTHENTICATION_BACKENDS` matters, so if the same
|
|
username and password is valid in multiple backends, Django will stop
|
|
processing at the first positive match.
|
|
|
|
If a backend raises a :class:`~django.core.exceptions.PermissionDenied`
|
|
exception, authentication will immediately fail. Django won't check the
|
|
backends that follow.
|
|
|
|
.. note::
|
|
|
|
Once a user has authenticated, Django stores which backend was used to
|
|
authenticate the user in the user's session, and re-uses the same backend
|
|
for the duration of that session whenever access to the currently
|
|
authenticated user is needed. This effectively means that authentication
|
|
sources are cached on a per-session basis, so if you change
|
|
:setting:`AUTHENTICATION_BACKENDS`, you'll need to clear out session data if
|
|
you need to force users to re-authenticate using different methods. A simple
|
|
way to do that is simply to execute ``Session.objects.all().delete()``.
|
|
|
|
Writing an authentication backend
|
|
---------------------------------
|
|
|
|
An authentication backend is a class that implements two required methods:
|
|
``get_user(user_id)`` and ``authenticate(request, **credentials)``, as well as
|
|
a set of optional permission related :ref:`authorization methods
|
|
<authorization_methods>`.
|
|
|
|
The ``get_user`` method takes a ``user_id`` -- which could be a username,
|
|
database ID or whatever, but has to be the primary key of your user object --
|
|
and returns a user object.
|
|
|
|
The ``authenticate`` method takes a ``request`` argument and credentials as
|
|
keyword arguments. Most of the time, it'll just look like this::
|
|
|
|
class MyBackend(object):
|
|
def authenticate(self, request, username=None, password=None):
|
|
# Check the username/password and return a user.
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
But it could also authenticate a token, like so::
|
|
|
|
class MyBackend(object):
|
|
def authenticate(self, request, token=None):
|
|
# Check the token and return a user.
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
Either way, ``authenticate()`` should check the credentials it gets and return
|
|
a user object that matches those credentials if the credentials are valid. If
|
|
they're not valid, it should return ``None``.
|
|
|
|
``request`` is an :class:`~django.http.HttpRequest` and may be ``None`` if it
|
|
wasn't provided to :func:`~django.contrib.auth.authenticate` (which passes it
|
|
on to the backend).
|
|
|
|
The Django admin is tightly coupled to the Django :ref:`User object
|
|
<user-objects>`. The best way to deal with this is to create a Django ``User``
|
|
object for each user that exists for your backend (e.g., in your LDAP
|
|
directory, your external SQL database, etc.) You can either write a script to
|
|
do this in advance, or your ``authenticate`` method can do it the first time a
|
|
user logs in.
|
|
|
|
Here's an example backend that authenticates against a username and password
|
|
variable defined in your ``settings.py`` file and creates a Django ``User``
|
|
object the first time a user authenticates::
|
|
|
|
from django.conf import settings
|
|
from django.contrib.auth.hashers import check_password
|
|
from django.contrib.auth.models import User
|
|
|
|
class SettingsBackend(object):
|
|
"""
|
|
Authenticate against the settings ADMIN_LOGIN and ADMIN_PASSWORD.
|
|
|
|
Use the login name and a hash of the password. For example:
|
|
|
|
ADMIN_LOGIN = 'admin'
|
|
ADMIN_PASSWORD = 'pbkdf2_sha256$30000$Vo0VlMnkR4Bk$qEvtdyZRWTcOsCnI/oQ7fVOu1XAURIZYoOZ3iq8Dr4M='
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
def authenticate(self, request, username=None, password=None):
|
|
login_valid = (settings.ADMIN_LOGIN == username)
|
|
pwd_valid = check_password(password, settings.ADMIN_PASSWORD)
|
|
if login_valid and pwd_valid:
|
|
try:
|
|
user = User.objects.get(username=username)
|
|
except User.DoesNotExist:
|
|
# Create a new user. There's no need to set a password
|
|
# because only the password from settings.py is checked.
|
|
user = User(username=username)
|
|
user.is_staff = True
|
|
user.is_superuser = True
|
|
user.save()
|
|
return user
|
|
return None
|
|
|
|
def get_user(self, user_id):
|
|
try:
|
|
return User.objects.get(pk=user_id)
|
|
except User.DoesNotExist:
|
|
return None
|
|
|
|
.. versionchanged:: 1.11
|
|
|
|
The ``request`` parameter was added to ``authenticate()`` and support for
|
|
backends that don't accept it will be removed in Django 2.1.
|
|
|
|
.. _authorization_methods:
|
|
|
|
Handling authorization in custom backends
|
|
-----------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Custom auth backends can provide their own permissions.
|
|
|
|
The user model will delegate permission lookup functions
|
|
(:meth:`~django.contrib.auth.models.User.get_group_permissions()`,
|
|
:meth:`~django.contrib.auth.models.User.get_all_permissions()`,
|
|
:meth:`~django.contrib.auth.models.User.has_perm()`, and
|
|
:meth:`~django.contrib.auth.models.User.has_module_perms()`) to any
|
|
authentication backend that implements these functions.
|
|
|
|
The permissions given to the user will be the superset of all permissions
|
|
returned by all backends. That is, Django grants a permission to a user that
|
|
any one backend grants.
|
|
|
|
If a backend raises a :class:`~django.core.exceptions.PermissionDenied`
|
|
exception in :meth:`~django.contrib.auth.models.User.has_perm()` or
|
|
:meth:`~django.contrib.auth.models.User.has_module_perms()`, the authorization
|
|
will immediately fail and Django won't check the backends that follow.
|
|
|
|
The simple backend above could implement permissions for the magic admin
|
|
fairly simply::
|
|
|
|
class SettingsBackend(object):
|
|
...
|
|
def has_perm(self, user_obj, perm, obj=None):
|
|
return user_obj.username == settings.ADMIN_LOGIN
|
|
|
|
This gives full permissions to the user granted access in the above example.
|
|
Notice that in addition to the same arguments given to the associated
|
|
:class:`django.contrib.auth.models.User` functions, the backend auth functions
|
|
all take the user object, which may be an anonymous user, as an argument.
|
|
|
|
A full authorization implementation can be found in the ``ModelBackend`` class
|
|
in `django/contrib/auth/backends.py`_, which is the default backend and queries
|
|
the ``auth_permission`` table most of the time. If you wish to provide
|
|
custom behavior for only part of the backend API, you can take advantage of
|
|
Python inheritance and subclass ``ModelBackend`` instead of implementing the
|
|
complete API in a custom backend.
|
|
|
|
.. _django/contrib/auth/backends.py: https://github.com/django/django/blob/master/django/contrib/auth/backends.py
|
|
|
|
.. _anonymous_auth:
|
|
|
|
Authorization for anonymous users
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
An anonymous user is one that is not authenticated i.e. they have provided no
|
|
valid authentication details. However, that does not necessarily mean they are
|
|
not authorized to do anything. At the most basic level, most websites
|
|
authorize anonymous users to browse most of the site, and many allow anonymous
|
|
posting of comments etc.
|
|
|
|
Django's permission framework does not have a place to store permissions for
|
|
anonymous users. However, the user object passed to an authentication backend
|
|
may be an :class:`django.contrib.auth.models.AnonymousUser` object, allowing
|
|
the backend to specify custom authorization behavior for anonymous users. This
|
|
is especially useful for the authors of re-usable apps, who can delegate all
|
|
questions of authorization to the auth backend, rather than needing settings,
|
|
for example, to control anonymous access.
|
|
|
|
.. _inactive_auth:
|
|
|
|
Authorization for inactive users
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
An inactive user is one that has its
|
|
:attr:`~django.contrib.auth.models.User.is_active` field set to ``False``. The
|
|
:class:`~django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend` and
|
|
:class:`~django.contrib.auth.backends.RemoteUserBackend` authentication
|
|
backends prohibits these users from authenticating. If a custom user model
|
|
doesn't have an :attr:`~django.contrib.auth.models.CustomUser.is_active` field,
|
|
all users will be allowed to authenticate.
|
|
|
|
You can use :class:`~django.contrib.auth.backends.AllowAllUsersModelBackend`
|
|
or :class:`~django.contrib.auth.backends.AllowAllUsersRemoteUserBackend` if you
|
|
want to allow inactive users to authenticate.
|
|
|
|
The support for anonymous users in the permission system allows for a scenario
|
|
where anonymous users have permissions to do something while inactive
|
|
authenticated users do not.
|
|
|
|
Do not forget to test for the ``is_active`` attribute of the user in your own
|
|
backend permission methods.
|
|
|
|
.. versionchanged:: 1.10
|
|
|
|
In older versions, the :class:`~django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend`
|
|
allowed inactive users to authenticate.
|
|
|
|
Handling object permissions
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
Django's permission framework has a foundation for object permissions, though
|
|
there is no implementation for it in the core. That means that checking for
|
|
object permissions will always return ``False`` or an empty list (depending on
|
|
the check performed). An authentication backend will receive the keyword
|
|
parameters ``obj`` and ``user_obj`` for each object related authorization
|
|
method and can return the object level permission as appropriate.
|
|
|
|
.. _custom-permissions:
|
|
|
|
Custom permissions
|
|
==================
|
|
|
|
To create custom permissions for a given model object, use the ``permissions``
|
|
:ref:`model Meta attribute <meta-options>`.
|
|
|
|
This example Task model creates three custom permissions, i.e., actions users
|
|
can or cannot do with Task instances, specific to your application::
|
|
|
|
class Task(models.Model):
|
|
...
|
|
class Meta:
|
|
permissions = (
|
|
("view_task", "Can see available tasks"),
|
|
("change_task_status", "Can change the status of tasks"),
|
|
("close_task", "Can remove a task by setting its status as closed"),
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
The only thing this does is create those extra permissions when you run
|
|
:djadmin:`manage.py migrate <migrate>` (the function that creates permissions
|
|
is connected to the :data:`~django.db.models.signals.post_migrate` signal).
|
|
Your code is in charge of checking the value of these permissions when a user
|
|
is trying to access the functionality provided by the application (viewing
|
|
tasks, changing the status of tasks, closing tasks.) Continuing the above
|
|
example, the following checks if a user may view tasks::
|
|
|
|
user.has_perm('app.view_task')
|
|
|
|
.. _extending-user:
|
|
|
|
Extending the existing ``User`` model
|
|
=====================================
|
|
|
|
There are two ways to extend the default
|
|
:class:`~django.contrib.auth.models.User` model without substituting your own
|
|
model. If the changes you need are purely behavioral, and don't require any
|
|
change to what is stored in the database, you can create a :ref:`proxy model
|
|
<proxy-models>` based on :class:`~django.contrib.auth.models.User`. This
|
|
allows for any of the features offered by proxy models including default
|
|
ordering, custom managers, or custom model methods.
|
|
|
|
If you wish to store information related to ``User``, you can use a
|
|
:class:`~django.db.models.OneToOneField` to a model containing the fields for
|
|
additional information. This one-to-one model is often called a profile model,
|
|
as it might store non-auth related information about a site user. For example
|
|
you might create an Employee model::
|
|
|
|
from django.contrib.auth.models import User
|
|
|
|
class Employee(models.Model):
|
|
user = models.OneToOneField(User, on_delete=models.CASCADE)
|
|
department = models.CharField(max_length=100)
|
|
|
|
Assuming an existing Employee Fred Smith who has both a User and Employee
|
|
model, you can access the related information using Django's standard related
|
|
model conventions::
|
|
|
|
>>> u = User.objects.get(username='fsmith')
|
|
>>> freds_department = u.employee.department
|
|
|
|
To add a profile model's fields to the user page in the admin, define an
|
|
:class:`~django.contrib.admin.InlineModelAdmin` (for this example, we'll use a
|
|
:class:`~django.contrib.admin.StackedInline`) in your app's ``admin.py`` and
|
|
add it to a ``UserAdmin`` class which is registered with the
|
|
:class:`~django.contrib.auth.models.User` class::
|
|
|
|
from django.contrib import admin
|
|
from django.contrib.auth.admin import UserAdmin as BaseUserAdmin
|
|
from django.contrib.auth.models import User
|
|
|
|
from my_user_profile_app.models import Employee
|
|
|
|
# Define an inline admin descriptor for Employee model
|
|
# which acts a bit like a singleton
|
|
class EmployeeInline(admin.StackedInline):
|
|
model = Employee
|
|
can_delete = False
|
|
verbose_name_plural = 'employee'
|
|
|
|
# Define a new User admin
|
|
class UserAdmin(BaseUserAdmin):
|
|
inlines = (EmployeeInline, )
|
|
|
|
# Re-register UserAdmin
|
|
admin.site.unregister(User)
|
|
admin.site.register(User, UserAdmin)
|
|
|
|
These profile models are not special in any way - they are just Django models
|
|
that happen to have a one-to-one link with a user model. As such, they aren't
|
|
auto created when a user is created, but
|
|
a :attr:`django.db.models.signals.post_save` could be used to create or update
|
|
related models as appropriate.
|
|
|
|
Using related models results in additional queries or joins to retrieve the
|
|
related data. Depending on your needs, a custom user model that includes the
|
|
related fields may be your better option, however, existing relations to the
|
|
default user model within your project's apps may justify the extra database
|
|
load.
|
|
|
|
.. _auth-custom-user:
|
|
|
|
Substituting a custom ``User`` model
|
|
====================================
|
|
|
|
Some kinds of projects may have authentication requirements for which Django's
|
|
built-in :class:`~django.contrib.auth.models.User` model is not always
|
|
appropriate. For instance, on some sites it makes more sense to use an email
|
|
address as your identification token instead of a username.
|
|
|
|
Django allows you to override the default user model by providing a value for
|
|
the :setting:`AUTH_USER_MODEL` setting that references a custom model::
|
|
|
|
AUTH_USER_MODEL = 'myapp.MyUser'
|
|
|
|
This dotted pair describes the name of the Django app (which must be in your
|
|
:setting:`INSTALLED_APPS`), and the name of the Django model that you wish to
|
|
use as your user model.
|
|
|
|
Using a custom user model when starting a project
|
|
-------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
If you're starting a new project, it's highly recommended to set up a custom
|
|
user model, even if the default :class:`~django.contrib.auth.models.User` model
|
|
is sufficient for you. This model behaves identically to the default user
|
|
model, but you'll be able to customize it in the future if the need arises::
|
|
|
|
from django.contrib.auth.models import AbstractUser
|
|
|
|
class User(AbstractUser):
|
|
pass
|
|
|
|
Don't forget to point :setting:`AUTH_USER_MODEL` to it. Do this before creating
|
|
any migrations or running ``manage.py migrate`` for the first time.
|
|
|
|
Changing to a custom user model mid-project
|
|
-------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Changing :setting:`AUTH_USER_MODEL` after you've created database tables is
|
|
significantly more difficult since it affects foreign keys and many-to-many
|
|
relationships, for example.
|
|
|
|
This change can't be done automatically and requires manually fixing your
|
|
schema, moving your data from the old user table, and possibly manually
|
|
reapplying some migrations. See :ticket:`25313` for an outline of the steps.
|
|
|
|
Due to limitations of Django's dynamic dependency feature for swappable
|
|
models, the model referenced by :setting:`AUTH_USER_MODEL` must be created in
|
|
the first migration of its app (usually called ``0001_initial``); otherwise,
|
|
you'll have dependency issues.
|
|
|
|
In addition, you may run into a ``CircularDependencyError`` when running your
|
|
migrations as Django won't be able to automatically break the dependency loop
|
|
due to the dynamic dependency. If you see this error, you should break the loop
|
|
by moving the models depended on by your user model into a second migration.
|
|
(You can try making two normal models that have a ``ForeignKey`` to each other
|
|
and seeing how ``makemigrations`` resolves that circular dependency if you want
|
|
to see how it's usually done.)
|
|
|
|
Reusable apps and ``AUTH_USER_MODEL``
|
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Reusable apps shouldn't implement a custom user model. A project may use many
|
|
apps, and two reusable apps that implemented a custom user model couldn't be
|
|
used together. If you need to store per user information in your app, use
|
|
a :class:`~django.db.models.ForeignKey` or
|
|
:class:`~django.db.models.OneToOneField` to ``settings.AUTH_USER_MODEL``
|
|
as described below.
|
|
|
|
Referencing the ``User`` model
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
.. currentmodule:: django.contrib.auth
|
|
|
|
If you reference :class:`~django.contrib.auth.models.User` directly (for
|
|
example, by referring to it in a foreign key), your code will not work in
|
|
projects where the :setting:`AUTH_USER_MODEL` setting has been changed to a
|
|
different user model.
|
|
|
|
.. function:: get_user_model()
|
|
|
|
Instead of referring to :class:`~django.contrib.auth.models.User` directly,
|
|
you should reference the user model using
|
|
``django.contrib.auth.get_user_model()``. This method will return the
|
|
currently active user model -- the custom user model if one is specified, or
|
|
:class:`~django.contrib.auth.models.User` otherwise.
|
|
|
|
When you define a foreign key or many-to-many relations to the user model,
|
|
you should specify the custom model using the :setting:`AUTH_USER_MODEL`
|
|
setting. For example::
|
|
|
|
from django.conf import settings
|
|
from django.db import models
|
|
|
|
class Article(models.Model):
|
|
author = models.ForeignKey(
|
|
settings.AUTH_USER_MODEL,
|
|
on_delete=models.CASCADE,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
When connecting to signals sent by the user model, you should specify
|
|
the custom model using the :setting:`AUTH_USER_MODEL` setting. For example::
|
|
|
|
from django.conf import settings
|
|
from django.db.models.signals import post_save
|
|
|
|
def post_save_receiver(sender, instance, created, **kwargs):
|
|
pass
|
|
|
|
post_save.connect(post_save_receiver, sender=settings.AUTH_USER_MODEL)
|
|
|
|
Generally speaking, it's easiest to refer to the user model with the
|
|
:setting:`AUTH_USER_MODEL` setting in code that's executed at import time,
|
|
however, it's also possible to call ``get_user_model()`` while Django
|
|
is importing models, so you could use
|
|
``models.ForeignKey(get_user_model(), ...)``.
|
|
|
|
If your app is tested with multiple user models, using
|
|
``@override_settings(AUTH_USER_MODEL=...)`` for example, and you cache the
|
|
result of ``get_user_model()`` in a module-level variable, you may need to
|
|
listen to the :data:`~django.test.signals.setting_changed` signal to clear
|
|
the cache. For example::
|
|
|
|
from django.apps import apps
|
|
from django.contrib.auth import get_user_model
|
|
from django.core.signals import setting_changed
|
|
from django.dispatch import receiver
|
|
|
|
@receiver(setting_changed)
|
|
def user_model_swapped(**kwargs):
|
|
if kwargs['setting'] == 'AUTH_USER_MODEL':
|
|
apps.clear_cache()
|
|
from myapp import some_module
|
|
some_module.UserModel = get_user_model()
|
|
|
|
.. versionchanged:: 1.11
|
|
|
|
The ability to call ``get_user_model()`` at import time was added.
|
|
|
|
.. _specifying-custom-user-model:
|
|
|
|
Specifying a custom user model
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Model design considerations
|
|
|
|
Think carefully before handling information not directly related to
|
|
authentication in your custom user model.
|
|
|
|
It may be better to store app-specific user information in a model
|
|
that has a relation with the user model. That allows each app to specify
|
|
its own user data requirements without risking conflicts with other
|
|
apps. On the other hand, queries to retrieve this related information
|
|
will involve a database join, which may have an effect on performance.
|
|
|
|
Django expects your custom user model to meet some minimum requirements.
|
|
|
|
#. If you use the default authentication backend, then your model must have a
|
|
single unique field that can be used for identification purposes. This can
|
|
be a username, an email address, or any other unique attribute. A non-unique
|
|
username field is allowed if you use a custom authentication backend that
|
|
can support it.
|
|
|
|
#. Your model must provide a way to address the user in a "short" and
|
|
"long" form. The most common interpretation of this would be to use
|
|
the user's given name as the "short" identifier, and the user's full
|
|
name as the "long" identifier. However, there are no constraints on
|
|
what these two methods return - if you want, they can return exactly
|
|
the same value.
|
|
|
|
The easiest way to construct a compliant custom user model is to inherit from
|
|
:class:`~django.contrib.auth.models.AbstractBaseUser`.
|
|
:class:`~django.contrib.auth.models.AbstractBaseUser` provides the core
|
|
implementation of a user model, including hashed passwords and tokenized
|
|
password resets. You must then provide some key implementation details:
|
|
|
|
.. currentmodule:: django.contrib.auth
|
|
|
|
.. class:: models.CustomUser
|
|
|
|
.. attribute:: USERNAME_FIELD
|
|
|
|
A string describing the name of the field on the user model that is
|
|
used as the unique identifier. This will usually be a username of some
|
|
kind, but it can also be an email address, or any other unique
|
|
identifier. The field *must* be unique (i.e., have ``unique=True`` set
|
|
in its definition), unless you use a custom authentication backend that
|
|
can support non-unique usernames.
|
|
|
|
In the following example, the field ``identifier`` is used
|
|
as the identifying field::
|
|
|
|
class MyUser(AbstractBaseUser):
|
|
identifier = models.CharField(max_length=40, unique=True)
|
|
...
|
|
USERNAME_FIELD = 'identifier'
|
|
|
|
:attr:`USERNAME_FIELD` now supports
|
|
:class:`~django.db.models.ForeignKey`\s. Since there is no way to pass
|
|
model instances during the :djadmin:`createsuperuser` prompt, expect the
|
|
user to enter the value of :attr:`~django.db.models.ForeignKey.to_field`
|
|
value (the :attr:`~django.db.models.Field.primary_key` by default) of an
|
|
existing instance.
|
|
|
|
.. attribute:: EMAIL_FIELD
|
|
|
|
.. versionadded:: 1.11
|
|
|
|
A string describing the name of the email field on the ``User`` model.
|
|
This value is returned by
|
|
:meth:`~models.AbstractBaseUser.get_email_field_name`.
|
|
|
|
.. attribute:: REQUIRED_FIELDS
|
|
|
|
A list of the field names that will be prompted for when creating a
|
|
user via the :djadmin:`createsuperuser` management command. The user
|
|
will be prompted to supply a value for each of these fields. It must
|
|
include any field for which :attr:`~django.db.models.Field.blank` is
|
|
``False`` or undefined and may include additional fields you want
|
|
prompted for when a user is created interactively.
|
|
``REQUIRED_FIELDS`` has no effect in other parts of Django, like
|
|
creating a user in the admin.
|
|
|
|
For example, here is the partial definition for a user model that
|
|
defines two required fields - a date of birth and height::
|
|
|
|
class MyUser(AbstractBaseUser):
|
|
...
|
|
date_of_birth = models.DateField()
|
|
height = models.FloatField()
|
|
...
|
|
REQUIRED_FIELDS = ['date_of_birth', 'height']
|
|
|
|
.. note::
|
|
|
|
``REQUIRED_FIELDS`` must contain all required fields on your user
|
|
model, but should *not* contain the ``USERNAME_FIELD`` or
|
|
``password`` as these fields will always be prompted for.
|
|
|
|
:attr:`REQUIRED_FIELDS` now supports
|
|
:class:`~django.db.models.ForeignKey`\s. Since there is no way to pass
|
|
model instances during the :djadmin:`createsuperuser` prompt, expect the
|
|
user to enter the value of :attr:`~django.db.models.ForeignKey.to_field`
|
|
value (the :attr:`~django.db.models.Field.primary_key` by default) of an
|
|
existing instance.
|
|
|
|
.. attribute:: is_active
|
|
|
|
A boolean attribute that indicates whether the user is considered
|
|
"active". This attribute is provided as an attribute on
|
|
``AbstractBaseUser`` defaulting to ``True``. How you choose to
|
|
implement it will depend on the details of your chosen auth backends.
|
|
See the documentation of the :attr:`is_active attribute on the built-in
|
|
user model <django.contrib.auth.models.User.is_active>` for details.
|
|
|
|
.. method:: get_full_name()
|
|
|
|
A longer formal identifier for the user. A common interpretation
|
|
would be the full name of the user, but it can be any string that
|
|
identifies the user.
|
|
|
|
.. method:: get_short_name()
|
|
|
|
A short, informal identifier for the user. A common interpretation
|
|
would be the first name of the user, but it can be any string that
|
|
identifies the user in an informal way. It may also return the same
|
|
value as :meth:`django.contrib.auth.models.User.get_full_name()`.
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Importing ``AbstractBaseUser``
|
|
|
|
``AbstractBaseUser`` and ``BaseUserManager`` are importable from
|
|
``django.contrib.auth.base_user`` so that they can be imported without
|
|
including ``django.contrib.auth`` in :setting:`INSTALLED_APPS`.
|
|
|
|
The following attributes and methods are available on any subclass of
|
|
:class:`~django.contrib.auth.models.AbstractBaseUser`:
|
|
|
|
.. class:: models.AbstractBaseUser
|
|
|
|
.. method:: get_username()
|
|
|
|
Returns the value of the field nominated by ``USERNAME_FIELD``.
|
|
|
|
.. method:: clean()
|
|
|
|
.. versionadded:: 1.10
|
|
|
|
Normalizes the username by calling :meth:`normalize_username`. If you
|
|
override this method, be sure to call ``super()`` to retain the
|
|
normalization.
|
|
|
|
.. classmethod:: get_email_field_name()
|
|
|
|
.. versionadded:: 1.11
|
|
|
|
Returns the name of the email field specified by the
|
|
:attr:`~models.CustomUser.EMAIL_FIELD` attribute. Defaults to
|
|
``'email'`` if ``EMAIL_FIELD`` isn't specified.
|
|
|
|
.. classmethod:: normalize_username(username)
|
|
|
|
.. versionadded:: 1.10
|
|
|
|
Applies NFKC Unicode normalization to usernames so that visually
|
|
identical characters with different Unicode code points are considered
|
|
identical.
|
|
|
|
.. attribute:: models.AbstractBaseUser.is_authenticated
|
|
|
|
Read-only attribute which is always ``True`` (as opposed to
|
|
``AnonymousUser.is_authenticated`` which is always ``False``).
|
|
This is a way to tell if the user has been authenticated. This does not
|
|
imply any permissions and doesn't check if the user is active or has
|
|
a valid session. Even though normally you will check this attribute on
|
|
``request.user`` to find out whether it has been populated by the
|
|
:class:`~django.contrib.auth.middleware.AuthenticationMiddleware`
|
|
(representing the currently logged-in user), you should know this
|
|
attribute is ``True`` for any :class:`~models.User` instance.
|
|
|
|
.. attribute:: models.AbstractBaseUser.is_anonymous
|
|
|
|
Read-only attribute which is always ``False``. This is a way of
|
|
differentiating :class:`~models.User` and :class:`~models.AnonymousUser`
|
|
objects. Generally, you should prefer using
|
|
:attr:`~models.User.is_authenticated` to this attribute.
|
|
|
|
.. method:: models.AbstractBaseUser.set_password(raw_password)
|
|
|
|
Sets the user's password to the given raw string, taking care of the
|
|
password hashing. Doesn't save the
|
|
:class:`~django.contrib.auth.models.AbstractBaseUser` object.
|
|
|
|
When the raw_password is ``None``, the password will be set to an
|
|
unusable password, as if
|
|
:meth:`~django.contrib.auth.models.AbstractBaseUser.set_unusable_password()`
|
|
were used.
|
|
|
|
.. method:: models.AbstractBaseUser.check_password(raw_password)
|
|
|
|
Returns ``True`` if the given raw string is the correct password for
|
|
the user. (This takes care of the password hashing in making the
|
|
comparison.)
|
|
|
|
.. method:: models.AbstractBaseUser.set_unusable_password()
|
|
|
|
Marks the user as having no password set. This isn't the same as
|
|
having a blank string for a password.
|
|
:meth:`~django.contrib.auth.models.AbstractBaseUser.check_password()` for this user
|
|
will never return ``True``. Doesn't save the
|
|
:class:`~django.contrib.auth.models.AbstractBaseUser` object.
|
|
|
|
You may need this if authentication for your application takes place
|
|
against an existing external source such as an LDAP directory.
|
|
|
|
.. method:: models.AbstractBaseUser.has_usable_password()
|
|
|
|
Returns ``False`` if
|
|
:meth:`~django.contrib.auth.models.AbstractBaseUser.set_unusable_password()` has
|
|
been called for this user.
|
|
|
|
.. method:: models.AbstractBaseUser.get_session_auth_hash()
|
|
|
|
Returns an HMAC of the password field. Used for
|
|
:ref:`session-invalidation-on-password-change`.
|
|
|
|
:class:`~models.AbstractUser` subclasses :class:`~models.AbstractBaseUser`:
|
|
|
|
.. class:: models.AbstractUser
|
|
|
|
.. method:: clean()
|
|
|
|
.. versionadded:: 1.11
|
|
|
|
Normalizes the email by calling
|
|
:meth:`.BaseUserManager.normalize_email`. If you override this method,
|
|
be sure to call ``super()`` to retain the normalization.
|
|
|
|
You should also define a custom manager for your user model. If your user model
|
|
defines ``username``, ``email``, ``is_staff``, ``is_active``, ``is_superuser``,
|
|
``last_login``, and ``date_joined`` fields the same as Django's default user,
|
|
you can just install Django's :class:`~django.contrib.auth.models.UserManager`;
|
|
however, if your user model defines different fields, you'll need to define a
|
|
custom manager that extends :class:`~django.contrib.auth.models.BaseUserManager`
|
|
providing two additional methods:
|
|
|
|
.. class:: models.CustomUserManager
|
|
|
|
.. method:: models.CustomUserManager.create_user(*username_field*, password=None, \**other_fields)
|
|
|
|
The prototype of ``create_user()`` should accept the username field,
|
|
plus all required fields as arguments. For example, if your user model
|
|
uses ``email`` as the username field, and has ``date_of_birth`` as a
|
|
required field, then ``create_user`` should be defined as::
|
|
|
|
def create_user(self, email, date_of_birth, password=None):
|
|
# create user here
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
.. method:: models.CustomUserManager.create_superuser(*username_field*, password, \**other_fields)
|
|
|
|
The prototype of ``create_superuser()`` should accept the username
|
|
field, plus all required fields as arguments. For example, if your user
|
|
model uses ``email`` as the username field, and has ``date_of_birth``
|
|
as a required field, then ``create_superuser`` should be defined as::
|
|
|
|
def create_superuser(self, email, date_of_birth, password):
|
|
# create superuser here
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
Unlike ``create_user()``, ``create_superuser()`` *must* require the
|
|
caller to provide a password.
|
|
|
|
:class:`~django.contrib.auth.models.BaseUserManager` provides the following
|
|
utility methods:
|
|
|
|
.. class:: models.BaseUserManager
|
|
|
|
.. classmethod:: models.BaseUserManager.normalize_email(email)
|
|
|
|
Normalizes email addresses by lowercasing the domain portion of the
|
|
email address.
|
|
|
|
.. method:: models.BaseUserManager.get_by_natural_key(username)
|
|
|
|
Retrieves a user instance using the contents of the field
|
|
nominated by ``USERNAME_FIELD``.
|
|
|
|
.. method:: models.BaseUserManager.make_random_password(length=10, allowed_chars='abcdefghjkmnpqrstuvwxyzABCDEFGHJKLMNPQRSTUVWXYZ23456789')
|
|
|
|
Returns a random password with the given length and given string of
|
|
allowed characters. Note that the default value of ``allowed_chars``
|
|
doesn't contain letters that can cause user confusion, including:
|
|
|
|
* ``i``, ``l``, ``I``, and ``1`` (lowercase letter i, lowercase
|
|
letter L, uppercase letter i, and the number one)
|
|
* ``o``, ``O``, and ``0`` (lowercase letter o, uppercase letter o,
|
|
and zero)
|
|
|
|
Extending Django's default ``User``
|
|
-----------------------------------
|
|
|
|
If you're entirely happy with Django's :class:`~django.contrib.auth.models.User`
|
|
model and you just want to add some additional profile information, you could
|
|
simply subclass :class:`django.contrib.auth.models.AbstractUser` and add your
|
|
custom profile fields, although we'd recommend a separate model as described in
|
|
the "Model design considerations" note of :ref:`specifying-custom-user-model`.
|
|
``AbstractUser`` provides the full implementation of the default
|
|
:class:`~django.contrib.auth.models.User` as an :ref:`abstract model
|
|
<abstract-base-classes>`.
|
|
|
|
.. _custom-users-and-the-built-in-auth-forms:
|
|
|
|
Custom users and the built-in auth forms
|
|
----------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Django's built-in :ref:`forms <built-in-auth-forms>` and :ref:`views
|
|
<built-in-auth-views>` make certain assumptions about the user model that they
|
|
are working with.
|
|
|
|
The following forms are compatible with any subclass of
|
|
:class:`~django.contrib.auth.models.AbstractBaseUser`:
|
|
|
|
* :class:`~django.contrib.auth.forms.AuthenticationForm`: Uses the username
|
|
field specified by :attr:`~models.CustomUser.USERNAME_FIELD`.
|
|
* :class:`~django.contrib.auth.forms.SetPasswordForm`
|
|
* :class:`~django.contrib.auth.forms.PasswordChangeForm`
|
|
* :class:`~django.contrib.auth.forms.AdminPasswordChangeForm`
|
|
|
|
The following forms make assumptions about the user model and can be used as-is
|
|
if those assumptions are met:
|
|
|
|
* :class:`~django.contrib.auth.forms.PasswordResetForm`: Assumes that the user
|
|
model has a field that stores the user's email address with the name returned
|
|
by :meth:`~models.AbstractBaseUser.get_email_field_name` (``email`` by
|
|
default) that can be used to identify the user and a boolean field named
|
|
``is_active`` to prevent password resets for inactive users.
|
|
|
|
Finally, the following forms are tied to
|
|
:class:`~django.contrib.auth.models.User` and need to be rewritten or extended
|
|
to work with a custom user model:
|
|
|
|
* :class:`~django.contrib.auth.forms.UserCreationForm`
|
|
* :class:`~django.contrib.auth.forms.UserChangeForm`
|
|
|
|
If your custom user model is a simple subclass of ``AbstractUser``, then you
|
|
can extend these forms in this manner::
|
|
|
|
from django.contrib.auth.forms import UserCreationForm
|
|
from myapp.models import CustomUser
|
|
|
|
class CustomUserCreationForm(UserCreationForm):
|
|
|
|
class Meta(UserCreationForm.Meta):
|
|
model = CustomUser
|
|
fields = UserCreationForm.Meta.fields + ('custom_field',)
|
|
|
|
Custom users and :mod:`django.contrib.admin`
|
|
--------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
If you want your custom user model to also work with the admin, your user model
|
|
must define some additional attributes and methods. These methods allow the
|
|
admin to control access of the user to admin content:
|
|
|
|
.. class:: models.CustomUser
|
|
|
|
.. attribute:: is_staff
|
|
|
|
Returns ``True`` if the user is allowed to have access to the admin site.
|
|
|
|
.. attribute:: is_active
|
|
|
|
Returns ``True`` if the user account is currently active.
|
|
|
|
.. method:: has_perm(perm, obj=None):
|
|
|
|
Returns ``True`` if the user has the named permission. If ``obj`` is
|
|
provided, the permission needs to be checked against a specific object
|
|
instance.
|
|
|
|
.. method:: has_module_perms(app_label):
|
|
|
|
Returns ``True`` if the user has permission to access models in
|
|
the given app.
|
|
|
|
You will also need to register your custom user model with the admin. If
|
|
your custom user model extends ``django.contrib.auth.models.AbstractUser``,
|
|
you can use Django's existing ``django.contrib.auth.admin.UserAdmin``
|
|
class. However, if your user model extends
|
|
:class:`~django.contrib.auth.models.AbstractBaseUser`, you'll need to define
|
|
a custom ``ModelAdmin`` class. It may be possible to subclass the default
|
|
``django.contrib.auth.admin.UserAdmin``; however, you'll need to
|
|
override any of the definitions that refer to fields on
|
|
``django.contrib.auth.models.AbstractUser`` that aren't on your
|
|
custom user class.
|
|
|
|
Custom users and permissions
|
|
----------------------------
|
|
|
|
To make it easy to include Django's permission framework into your own user
|
|
class, Django provides :class:`~django.contrib.auth.models.PermissionsMixin`.
|
|
This is an abstract model you can include in the class hierarchy for your user
|
|
model, giving you all the methods and database fields necessary to support
|
|
Django's permission model.
|
|
|
|
:class:`~django.contrib.auth.models.PermissionsMixin` provides the following
|
|
methods and attributes:
|
|
|
|
.. class:: models.PermissionsMixin
|
|
|
|
.. attribute:: models.PermissionsMixin.is_superuser
|
|
|
|
Boolean. Designates that this user has all permissions without
|
|
explicitly assigning them.
|
|
|
|
.. method:: models.PermissionsMixin.get_group_permissions(obj=None)
|
|
|
|
Returns a set of permission strings that the user has, through their
|
|
groups.
|
|
|
|
If ``obj`` is passed in, only returns the group permissions for
|
|
this specific object.
|
|
|
|
.. method:: models.PermissionsMixin.get_all_permissions(obj=None)
|
|
|
|
Returns a set of permission strings that the user has, both through
|
|
group and user permissions.
|
|
|
|
If ``obj`` is passed in, only returns the permissions for this
|
|
specific object.
|
|
|
|
.. method:: models.PermissionsMixin.has_perm(perm, obj=None)
|
|
|
|
Returns ``True`` if the user has the specified permission, where
|
|
``perm`` is in the format ``"<app label>.<permission codename>"`` (see
|
|
:ref:`permissions <topic-authorization>`). If the user is inactive, this method will
|
|
always return ``False``.
|
|
|
|
If ``obj`` is passed in, this method won't check for a permission for
|
|
the model, but for this specific object.
|
|
|
|
.. method:: models.PermissionsMixin.has_perms(perm_list, obj=None)
|
|
|
|
Returns ``True`` if the user has each of the specified permissions,
|
|
where each perm is in the format
|
|
``"<app label>.<permission codename>"``. If the user is inactive,
|
|
this method will always return ``False``.
|
|
|
|
If ``obj`` is passed in, this method won't check for permissions for
|
|
the model, but for the specific object.
|
|
|
|
.. method:: models.PermissionsMixin.has_module_perms(package_name)
|
|
|
|
Returns ``True`` if the user has any permissions in the given package
|
|
(the Django app label). If the user is inactive, this method will
|
|
always return ``False``.
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: ``PermissionsMixin`` and ``ModelBackend``
|
|
|
|
If you don't include the
|
|
:class:`~django.contrib.auth.models.PermissionsMixin`, you must ensure you
|
|
don't invoke the permissions methods on ``ModelBackend``. ``ModelBackend``
|
|
assumes that certain fields are available on your user model. If your user
|
|
model doesn't provide those fields, you'll receive database errors when
|
|
you check permissions.
|
|
|
|
Custom users and proxy models
|
|
-----------------------------
|
|
|
|
One limitation of custom user models is that installing a custom user model
|
|
will break any proxy model extending :class:`~django.contrib.auth.models.User`.
|
|
Proxy models must be based on a concrete base class; by defining a custom user
|
|
model, you remove the ability of Django to reliably identify the base class.
|
|
|
|
If your project uses proxy models, you must either modify the proxy to extend
|
|
the user model that's in use in your project, or merge your proxy's behavior
|
|
into your :class:`~django.contrib.auth.models.User` subclass.
|
|
|
|
A full example
|
|
--------------
|
|
|
|
Here is an example of an admin-compliant custom user app. This user model uses
|
|
an email address as the username, and has a required date of birth; it
|
|
provides no permission checking, beyond a simple ``admin`` flag on the user
|
|
account. This model would be compatible with all the built-in auth forms and
|
|
views, except for the user creation forms. This example illustrates how most of
|
|
the components work together, but is not intended to be copied directly into
|
|
projects for production use.
|
|
|
|
This code would all live in a ``models.py`` file for a custom
|
|
authentication app::
|
|
|
|
from django.db import models
|
|
from django.contrib.auth.models import (
|
|
BaseUserManager, AbstractBaseUser
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
class MyUserManager(BaseUserManager):
|
|
def create_user(self, email, date_of_birth, password=None):
|
|
"""
|
|
Creates and saves a User with the given email, date of
|
|
birth and password.
|
|
"""
|
|
if not email:
|
|
raise ValueError('Users must have an email address')
|
|
|
|
user = self.model(
|
|
email=self.normalize_email(email),
|
|
date_of_birth=date_of_birth,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
user.set_password(password)
|
|
user.save(using=self._db)
|
|
return user
|
|
|
|
def create_superuser(self, email, date_of_birth, password):
|
|
"""
|
|
Creates and saves a superuser with the given email, date of
|
|
birth and password.
|
|
"""
|
|
user = self.create_user(
|
|
email,
|
|
password=password,
|
|
date_of_birth=date_of_birth,
|
|
)
|
|
user.is_admin = True
|
|
user.save(using=self._db)
|
|
return user
|
|
|
|
|
|
class MyUser(AbstractBaseUser):
|
|
email = models.EmailField(
|
|
verbose_name='email address',
|
|
max_length=255,
|
|
unique=True,
|
|
)
|
|
date_of_birth = models.DateField()
|
|
is_active = models.BooleanField(default=True)
|
|
is_admin = models.BooleanField(default=False)
|
|
|
|
objects = MyUserManager()
|
|
|
|
USERNAME_FIELD = 'email'
|
|
REQUIRED_FIELDS = ['date_of_birth']
|
|
|
|
def get_full_name(self):
|
|
# The user is identified by their email address
|
|
return self.email
|
|
|
|
def get_short_name(self):
|
|
# The user is identified by their email address
|
|
return self.email
|
|
|
|
def __str__(self): # __unicode__ on Python 2
|
|
return self.email
|
|
|
|
def has_perm(self, perm, obj=None):
|
|
"Does the user have a specific permission?"
|
|
# Simplest possible answer: Yes, always
|
|
return True
|
|
|
|
def has_module_perms(self, app_label):
|
|
"Does the user have permissions to view the app `app_label`?"
|
|
# Simplest possible answer: Yes, always
|
|
return True
|
|
|
|
@property
|
|
def is_staff(self):
|
|
"Is the user a member of staff?"
|
|
# Simplest possible answer: All admins are staff
|
|
return self.is_admin
|
|
|
|
Then, to register this custom user model with Django's admin, the following
|
|
code would be required in the app's ``admin.py`` file::
|
|
|
|
from django import forms
|
|
from django.contrib import admin
|
|
from django.contrib.auth.models import Group
|
|
from django.contrib.auth.admin import UserAdmin as BaseUserAdmin
|
|
from django.contrib.auth.forms import ReadOnlyPasswordHashField
|
|
|
|
from customauth.models import MyUser
|
|
|
|
|
|
class UserCreationForm(forms.ModelForm):
|
|
"""A form for creating new users. Includes all the required
|
|
fields, plus a repeated password."""
|
|
password1 = forms.CharField(label='Password', widget=forms.PasswordInput)
|
|
password2 = forms.CharField(label='Password confirmation', widget=forms.PasswordInput)
|
|
|
|
class Meta:
|
|
model = MyUser
|
|
fields = ('email', 'date_of_birth')
|
|
|
|
def clean_password2(self):
|
|
# Check that the two password entries match
|
|
password1 = self.cleaned_data.get("password1")
|
|
password2 = self.cleaned_data.get("password2")
|
|
if password1 and password2 and password1 != password2:
|
|
raise forms.ValidationError("Passwords don't match")
|
|
return password2
|
|
|
|
def save(self, commit=True):
|
|
# Save the provided password in hashed format
|
|
user = super(UserCreationForm, self).save(commit=False)
|
|
user.set_password(self.cleaned_data["password1"])
|
|
if commit:
|
|
user.save()
|
|
return user
|
|
|
|
|
|
class UserChangeForm(forms.ModelForm):
|
|
"""A form for updating users. Includes all the fields on
|
|
the user, but replaces the password field with admin's
|
|
password hash display field.
|
|
"""
|
|
password = ReadOnlyPasswordHashField()
|
|
|
|
class Meta:
|
|
model = MyUser
|
|
fields = ('email', 'password', 'date_of_birth', 'is_active', 'is_admin')
|
|
|
|
def clean_password(self):
|
|
# Regardless of what the user provides, return the initial value.
|
|
# This is done here, rather than on the field, because the
|
|
# field does not have access to the initial value
|
|
return self.initial["password"]
|
|
|
|
|
|
class UserAdmin(BaseUserAdmin):
|
|
# The forms to add and change user instances
|
|
form = UserChangeForm
|
|
add_form = UserCreationForm
|
|
|
|
# The fields to be used in displaying the User model.
|
|
# These override the definitions on the base UserAdmin
|
|
# that reference specific fields on auth.User.
|
|
list_display = ('email', 'date_of_birth', 'is_admin')
|
|
list_filter = ('is_admin',)
|
|
fieldsets = (
|
|
(None, {'fields': ('email', 'password')}),
|
|
('Personal info', {'fields': ('date_of_birth',)}),
|
|
('Permissions', {'fields': ('is_admin',)}),
|
|
)
|
|
# add_fieldsets is not a standard ModelAdmin attribute. UserAdmin
|
|
# overrides get_fieldsets to use this attribute when creating a user.
|
|
add_fieldsets = (
|
|
(None, {
|
|
'classes': ('wide',),
|
|
'fields': ('email', 'date_of_birth', 'password1', 'password2')}
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
search_fields = ('email',)
|
|
ordering = ('email',)
|
|
filter_horizontal = ()
|
|
|
|
# Now register the new UserAdmin...
|
|
admin.site.register(MyUser, UserAdmin)
|
|
# ... and, since we're not using Django's built-in permissions,
|
|
# unregister the Group model from admin.
|
|
admin.site.unregister(Group)
|
|
|
|
Finally, specify the custom model as the default user model for your project
|
|
using the :setting:`AUTH_USER_MODEL` setting in your ``settings.py``::
|
|
|
|
AUTH_USER_MODEL = 'customauth.MyUser'
|