mirror of
https://github.com/django/django.git
synced 2024-12-01 15:42:04 +01:00
Fixed #31413 -- Fixed isolation of migrations.test_loader on databases that don't support transactions.
This commit is contained in:
parent
a9a7421ab8
commit
a2e3f95b09
@ -51,6 +51,19 @@ class LoaderTests(TestCase):
|
||||
Tests the disk and database loader, and running through migrations
|
||||
in memory.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
def setUp(self):
|
||||
self.applied_records = []
|
||||
|
||||
def tearDown(self):
|
||||
# Unapply records on databases that don't roll back changes after each
|
||||
# test method.
|
||||
if not connection.features.supports_transactions:
|
||||
for recorder, app, name in self.applied_records:
|
||||
recorder.record_unapplied(app, name)
|
||||
|
||||
def record_applied(self, recorder, app, name):
|
||||
recorder.record_applied(app, name)
|
||||
self.applied_records.append((recorder, app, name))
|
||||
|
||||
@override_settings(MIGRATION_MODULES={"migrations": "migrations.test_migrations"})
|
||||
@modify_settings(INSTALLED_APPS={'append': 'basic'})
|
||||
@ -243,7 +256,7 @@ class LoaderTests(TestCase):
|
||||
1,
|
||||
)
|
||||
# However, fake-apply one migration and it should now use the old two
|
||||
recorder.record_applied("migrations", "0001_initial")
|
||||
self.record_applied(recorder, 'migrations', '0001_initial')
|
||||
migration_loader.build_graph()
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
len([x for x in migration_loader.graph.nodes if x[0] == "migrations"]),
|
||||
@ -267,33 +280,33 @@ class LoaderTests(TestCase):
|
||||
self.assertEqual(num_nodes(), 5)
|
||||
|
||||
# Starting at 1 or 2 should use the squashed migration too
|
||||
recorder.record_applied("migrations", "1_auto")
|
||||
self.record_applied(recorder, 'migrations', '1_auto')
|
||||
loader.build_graph()
|
||||
self.assertEqual(num_nodes(), 4)
|
||||
|
||||
recorder.record_applied("migrations", "2_auto")
|
||||
self.record_applied(recorder, 'migrations', '2_auto')
|
||||
loader.build_graph()
|
||||
self.assertEqual(num_nodes(), 3)
|
||||
|
||||
# However, starting at 3 to 5 cannot use the squashed migration
|
||||
recorder.record_applied("migrations", "3_auto")
|
||||
self.record_applied(recorder, 'migrations', '3_auto')
|
||||
loader.build_graph()
|
||||
self.assertEqual(num_nodes(), 4)
|
||||
|
||||
recorder.record_applied("migrations", "4_auto")
|
||||
self.record_applied(recorder, 'migrations', '4_auto')
|
||||
loader.build_graph()
|
||||
self.assertEqual(num_nodes(), 3)
|
||||
|
||||
# Starting at 5 to 7 we are passed the squashed migrations
|
||||
recorder.record_applied("migrations", "5_auto")
|
||||
self.record_applied(recorder, 'migrations', '5_auto')
|
||||
loader.build_graph()
|
||||
self.assertEqual(num_nodes(), 2)
|
||||
|
||||
recorder.record_applied("migrations", "6_auto")
|
||||
self.record_applied(recorder, 'migrations', '6_auto')
|
||||
loader.build_graph()
|
||||
self.assertEqual(num_nodes(), 1)
|
||||
|
||||
recorder.record_applied("migrations", "7_auto")
|
||||
self.record_applied(recorder, 'migrations', '7_auto')
|
||||
loader.build_graph()
|
||||
self.assertEqual(num_nodes(), 0)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -329,8 +342,8 @@ class LoaderTests(TestCase):
|
||||
def test_loading_squashed_complex_multi_apps_partially_applied(self):
|
||||
loader = MigrationLoader(connection)
|
||||
recorder = MigrationRecorder(connection)
|
||||
recorder.record_applied('app1', '1_auto')
|
||||
recorder.record_applied('app1', '2_auto')
|
||||
self.record_applied(recorder, 'app1', '1_auto')
|
||||
self.record_applied(recorder, 'app1', '2_auto')
|
||||
loader.build_graph()
|
||||
|
||||
plan = set(loader.graph.forwards_plan(('app1', '4_auto')))
|
||||
@ -360,11 +373,11 @@ class LoaderTests(TestCase):
|
||||
self.assertEqual(num_nodes(), 5)
|
||||
|
||||
# Starting at 1 or 2 should use the squashed migration too
|
||||
recorder.record_applied("migrations", "1_auto")
|
||||
self.record_applied(recorder, 'migrations', '1_auto')
|
||||
loader.build_graph()
|
||||
self.assertEqual(num_nodes(), 4)
|
||||
|
||||
recorder.record_applied("migrations", "2_auto")
|
||||
self.record_applied(recorder, 'migrations', '2_auto')
|
||||
loader.build_graph()
|
||||
self.assertEqual(num_nodes(), 3)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -374,24 +387,24 @@ class LoaderTests(TestCase):
|
||||
"[migrations.3_squashed_5] but wasn't able to because some of the replaced "
|
||||
"migrations are already applied.")
|
||||
|
||||
recorder.record_applied("migrations", "3_auto")
|
||||
self.record_applied(recorder, 'migrations', '3_auto')
|
||||
with self.assertRaisesMessage(NodeNotFoundError, msg):
|
||||
loader.build_graph()
|
||||
|
||||
recorder.record_applied("migrations", "4_auto")
|
||||
self.record_applied(recorder, 'migrations', '4_auto')
|
||||
with self.assertRaisesMessage(NodeNotFoundError, msg):
|
||||
loader.build_graph()
|
||||
|
||||
# Starting at 5 to 7 we are passed the squashed migrations
|
||||
recorder.record_applied("migrations", "5_auto")
|
||||
self.record_applied(recorder, 'migrations', '5_auto')
|
||||
loader.build_graph()
|
||||
self.assertEqual(num_nodes(), 2)
|
||||
|
||||
recorder.record_applied("migrations", "6_auto")
|
||||
self.record_applied(recorder, 'migrations', '6_auto')
|
||||
loader.build_graph()
|
||||
self.assertEqual(num_nodes(), 1)
|
||||
|
||||
recorder.record_applied("migrations", "7_auto")
|
||||
self.record_applied(recorder, 'migrations', '7_auto')
|
||||
loader.build_graph()
|
||||
self.assertEqual(num_nodes(), 0)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -403,7 +416,7 @@ class LoaderTests(TestCase):
|
||||
loader = MigrationLoader(connection=None)
|
||||
loader.check_consistent_history(connection)
|
||||
recorder = MigrationRecorder(connection)
|
||||
recorder.record_applied('migrations', '0002_second')
|
||||
self.record_applied(recorder, 'migrations', '0002_second')
|
||||
msg = (
|
||||
"Migration migrations.0002_second is applied before its dependency "
|
||||
"migrations.0001_initial on database 'default'."
|
||||
@ -422,10 +435,10 @@ class LoaderTests(TestCase):
|
||||
"""
|
||||
loader = MigrationLoader(connection=None)
|
||||
recorder = MigrationRecorder(connection)
|
||||
recorder.record_applied('migrations', '0001_initial')
|
||||
recorder.record_applied('migrations', '0002_second')
|
||||
self.record_applied(recorder, 'migrations', '0001_initial')
|
||||
self.record_applied(recorder, 'migrations', '0002_second')
|
||||
loader.check_consistent_history(connection)
|
||||
recorder.record_applied('migrations', '0003_third')
|
||||
self.record_applied(recorder, 'migrations', '0003_third')
|
||||
loader.check_consistent_history(connection)
|
||||
|
||||
@override_settings(MIGRATION_MODULES={
|
||||
@ -471,8 +484,8 @@ class LoaderTests(TestCase):
|
||||
self.assertEqual(plan, expected_plan)
|
||||
|
||||
# Fake-apply a few from app1: unsquashes migration in app1.
|
||||
recorder.record_applied('app1', '1_auto')
|
||||
recorder.record_applied('app1', '2_auto')
|
||||
self.record_applied(recorder, 'app1', '1_auto')
|
||||
self.record_applied(recorder, 'app1', '2_auto')
|
||||
loader.build_graph()
|
||||
plan = set(loader.graph.forwards_plan(('app1', '4_auto')))
|
||||
plan = plan - loader.applied_migrations.keys()
|
||||
@ -484,7 +497,7 @@ class LoaderTests(TestCase):
|
||||
self.assertEqual(plan, expected_plan)
|
||||
|
||||
# Fake-apply one from app2: unsquashes migration in app2 too.
|
||||
recorder.record_applied('app2', '1_auto')
|
||||
self.record_applied(recorder, 'app2', '1_auto')
|
||||
loader.build_graph()
|
||||
plan = set(loader.graph.forwards_plan(('app1', '4_auto')))
|
||||
plan = plan - loader.applied_migrations.keys()
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user